Qualitative Exploration of Factors Making Physics Challenging for Students

Siti Nurjanah, Nurul Aulia Martaputri, Hepi Kharisda Hulu, Armelya Novieyanti, Yuri Aniasari, Salman Rashid

Abstract


The majority of students tend to perceive physics as a challenging subject. While numerous studies have investigated the factors contributing to this challenge, more comprehensive qualitative research needs to be conducted that delves deeply into this phenomenon, particularly within the constructivist paradigm. This study employs the constructivist paradigm as a framework to examine the elements that contribute to students’ perception of physics as a challenging subject. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method. The data for this study were collected through a thematic analysis of comments from the Quora platform. The sample consisted of ten comments from the Quora website, selected based on the highest recommendations. The data were subjected to a thematic analysis using ATLAS.ti software version 9. The study identified seven primary themes that analyze the elements contributing to the challenges in acquiring knowledge in the field of physics. These topics include the nature of physics itself, the role of teachers, the characteristics of students, the disparity between physicists and non-experts, the curriculum, parental influence, and the discipline’s historical development. The challenges encountered in studying physics arise from intricate and interconnected causes. Further research could be undertaken to examine efficient learning strategies to overcome these challenges and explore additional variables that may contribute to this phenomenon.

Keywords: Constructivist paradigm, physics challenges, physics education, student perceptions, thematic analysis

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpf.v12.n2.202401




Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdussamad, H. Z., & Sik, M. S. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. CV. Syakir Media Press.

Afriansyah, E. A. (2016). Penggunaan software ATLAS. ti sebagai alat bantu proses analisis data kualitatif. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 53–63.

Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Bigozzi, L., Tarchi, C., Fiorentini, C., Falsini, P., & Stefanelli, F. (2018). The influence of teaching approach on students’ conceptual learning in physics. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02474

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif dan campuran.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Dewi, H. R., & Yusro, A. C. (2016). Analisis kesulitan belajar IPA materi gerak pada siswa kelas VII MTs Sunan Ampel. Prosiding SNPF (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika).

Djudin, T., & Grapragasem, S. (2019). The Use of Pictorial Analogy to Increase Students’ Achievement and Its Retention of Physics Lessons of Direct Current. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 9(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n2.p140-151

Dummett, M. (1993). The seas of language (Vol. 58, Issue 4). Oxford University Press.

Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self‐efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302

Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Parental influences on youth involvement in sports. In Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective. (pp. 145–164). Fitness Information Technology.

Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Halmuniati, H., Saputra, M. D., Syam, N., & Asshagab, S. M. (2022). Analysis of Teacher Difficulties in Teaching Physics Courses in MAN 1 Konawe Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 8(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v8i2.3843

Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15129

Johnson, R., Boubrahimi, S. F., Bahri, O., & Hamdi, S. M. (2024). Combining Empirical and Physics-Based Models for Solar Wind Prediction. Universe, 10(191).

Kanderakis, N. (2016). The Mathematics of High School Physics: Models, Symbols, Algorithmic Operations and Meaning. Science and Education, 25(7–8), 837–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9851-5

Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378

Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2013). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 393–441). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824696-18

Nawahdani, A. M., Triani, E., Azzahra, M. Z., Maison, M., Kurniawan, D. A., & Melisa, D. (2022). Hubungan minat dan motivasi belajar siswa terhadap mata pelajaran fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 6(1), 12–18.

Nurhaniah, A., Arafah, K., & Ali, M. S. (2022). Diagnosis kesulitan materi fisika pada peserta didik kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 3 Barru.

Oktavianty, E., Haratua, T. M. S., & Anuru, M. (2018). The effect of remediation on Reducing misconception: A metaanalysis of student thesis on physics education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 12039.

Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. (2008). What makes physics difficult? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 30–34.

Redish, E. F., & Burciaga, J. R. (2003). Teaching physics: With the physics suite (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ.

Redish, E. F., & Smith, K. A. (2015). Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00980.x

Rinaldi, R., Muchtar, Y. R. D., & Haryadi, R. (2018). Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Fenomena Alam Melalui Metode Discovery Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 12–18. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/sendikfi/index

Rollnick, M., Davidowitz, B., Keane, M., Bapoo, A., & Magadla, L. (2008). Students’ learning-approach profiles in relation to their university experience and success. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701792286

Samben, S. (2014). Pengaruh minat dan kebiasaan belajar terhadap prestasi belajar. Jurnal Eklektika, 2(1), 60–66.

Saputra, H., & Mustika, D. (2022). Analysis the Conceptual Understanding Level and Understanding Model of Pre-Service Physics Teacher. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2367–2372. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2246

Sezer, K., & Karataş, F. Ö. (2022). Research Trends about Analogy Studies in Science Education: A Descriptive Content Analysis. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2.39095

Sukiminiandari, Y. P., Budi, A. S., & Supriyati, Y. (2015). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran fisika dengan pendekatan saintifik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (e-Journal), 4, SNF2015-II.

Taber, K. S. (2001). Shifting sands: A case study of conceptual development as competition between alternative conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006572

Tindan, T. N., & Arthur, J. M. (2024). Understanding senior high school students’ difficulties in learning physics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(2), 494–498.

Tsaparlis, G., & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school students’ conceptual difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 895–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801891908

Viennot, L. (2001). Reasoning in physics: The part of common sense. Springer Science & Business Media.

Xie, Z., Alsafadi, F., & Wu, X. (2021). Towards improving the predictive capability of computer simulations by integrating inverse Uncertainty Quantification and quantitative validation with Bayesian hypothesis testing. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 383, 111423. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2021.111423


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  Lisensi Creative Commons
Copyright of the article is reserved by the author(s). Published by the Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung in Collaboration with the Physical Society of Indonesia (since 2019).  This article is an open-access article under the Creative Commons non-commercial-share-alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.