Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika (p-ISSN: 2302-0105, e-ISSN: 2684-9828)  is a media publication for researchers, lecturers, teachers, educational practitioners, and students, related to issues of physics learning innovation which include:

  • Assessment including formative, summative, authentic/work-integrated, etc.;
  • Media development and physics learning design based ICT including printed, visual, electronic media;
  • Inquiry-based learning including inquiry strategy, structured, controlled, guided, and free inquiry;
  •  STEM Education;
  • Scientific Approach includig scientific method as an on-going method;
  • Blended and mobile learning.

Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika publishes articles that fulfill certain qualities and publication, which can provide knowledge and wisdom for increasing the learning of physics of lower to higher education.

 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika has the Standard Operational Programme (SOP). All articles in JPP should submitted in ojs system through http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id. After submitting the articles, editor is checking the article scope to make the decision wether the article is accepted or rejected. The accepted article then send to the blind reviewer for substances checking. In this process, reviewer is making the decision wheter the article is accpeted or rejected from the substances through the editor. The final article is laying out by lay outer before on line published.

 

 

 

Publication Frequency

The Journal was first published in 2012 and regularly published twice per year in June and December. On June edition, manuscript received no later than the beginning of March. The manuscript edition December received no later than the beginning of September.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Screening for Plagiarism

The Journal has an authority to screen articles for plagiarism. We use iThenticate and online Plagiarism Checker to check the authenticity of the article.

 

Publication Ethics Statement

Ethics Statement

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication decisions

The decision of which articles to be published in the Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika (JPF) or Journal of Physics Learning is entirely editorial responsibility. In this case the editorial team was guided by the policy of the editorial board of the journal and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editorial team can negotiate with reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

In evaluating each article submitted to JPF, the editorial team will be fair and continue to prioritize the assessment of intellectual content, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the political philosophy of the author.

Confidentiality

All articles that submit to JPF will be kept confidential. Therefore, editors and editorial staff may not disclose any information from these submitted articles to other parties other than relevant authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, advisors and other editorial publishers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Without the express written consent of the author, the editor in his research is prohibited to use the unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript to the JPF.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer reviewers assist editors to make editorial decisions on all manuscript submitted to JPF. In addition, peer reviewers may also assist the authors to improve the papers through editorial communication with the author.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Peer reviewers must keep the confidentiality of each received manuscript and they are not allowed to display or discuss either part or all of the text except as permitted by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

 

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

 

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

 

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

 

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
There are no fees required for submission to review the process of the article

 

Fast-Track Review: 0.00 (IDR)
With the payment of this fee, the review, editorial decision, and author notification on this manuscript are guaranteed to take place within 4 weeks.

 

Article Publication: 400,000 (IDR)

Every manuscript submitted to Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif is free of charge. Publication fee charged 400,000 IDR for Indonesian author or US$ 50 for the non-Indonesian author. This includes peer-review, editing, publishing, and maintaining and archiving.