Implementation of Written Assessment Higher Order Thinking Skills in Physical Learning with a Scientific Approach based Blended Learning

Chandra Ertikanto, I Wayan Distrik, I Dewa Putu Nyeneng

Abstract


This study aims to describe: (1) the effectiveness of HOTS in physics learning with a blended learning-based scientific approach, (2) the efficiency of the suitability of learning objectives of physics through a blended learning-based scientific approach with HOTS written assessment, and (3) safety through teacher responses to written assessments. HOTS through a scientific approach based on blended learning in physics learning. The design of this research is the implementation stage of continually development research from 2019 which has gone through the stages of product testing and extensive testing, which focus on Senior High Schools in Bandar Lampung City, Lampung Province during the Covid-19 pandemic. The sample used in this study was 36 students of SMAN 9 Bandar Lampung with a purposive sampling technique. The research instrument used was the HOTS Written Assessment with multiple choices of 20 questions. Data analysis techniques are carried out qualitatively. Conclusion: (1) The results of the effectiveness test were 83,33% of students passed the KKM, and the highest score was 97,5. (2) The efficiency of the suitability of the learning objectives of Physics through a blended learning-based scientific approach with HOTS written assessment, is very efficient in use, and (3) The safety of HOTS written assessments through a blended learning-based scientific approach in physics learning is very meaningful.

Keywords: Assessment, Higher order thinking skills, Scientific Approach

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpf.v10.n1.202202


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, Lorin W, David R. Krathwohl, Peter W. Airasian, Kathleen A. Cruikshank, Richard E. Mayer, Paul R. Pintrich, James Raths, dan Merlin C. Wittrock. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessning. New York: Pre-Press Company, Inc

Anonim. 2013. Permendikbud Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

. Permendikbud Nomor 81A Tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

. 2014. Permendikbud Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Akinoglu, Orhan. 2008. “Assessment of the Inquiry-Based Project Implementation Process in Science Education Upon Students’ Points of Views”. International Journal of Instruction, 1 (1).

Arikunto, S. 2012. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Arikunto, S. & Jabar, A. 2012. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Buck, and Gayle A. 2007. “Learning How Make inquiry into Science Discernible to Middle Level Teachers”. Journal for Science Teacher Education.

Dwiyogo, Wasis D. 2016. Pembelajaran berbasis blended learning. Malang: Wineka Media.

Haryati, Mimin. 2013. Model dan Teknik Penilaian pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Referensi.

Husamah. 2014. Pembelajaran Bauran (Blended Learning). Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka

Kartowagiran, B. 2012. Penulisan butir soal. Makalah disampaikan pada Pelatihan penulisan dan analisis butir soal bagi Sumber daya PNS Dik-Rekinpeg, di Hotel Kawanua Aerotel, Jakarta.

Kunandar. 2013. Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 revisi). Jakarta: PT. Graha Grafindo Persada.

Khabibah, S. 2006. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Soal Terbuka untuk Meningkatkan Kreatifitas Siswa Sekolah Dasar, Disertasi, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Koyan, W. 2012. Konstruksi Tes: Singaraja. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Press.

Neumeier, P. 2005. A Closer Look at Blended Learning. Parameter of Designing a Blended Learning Environment for Language Teaching and Laerning ReCALL. 17 (2) 163-178

Nitko, A. J. 1996. Educational assessment of students. Prentice-Hall Order Processing Center, PO Box 11071, Des Moines, IA 50336-1071.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2010. Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group

Sola, Agboola Omowunmi & Ojo, Oloyede Ezekiel. 2007. “Effects of Project, Inquiry and Lecture-Demonstration Teaching Methods on Senior Secondary Students’ Achievement in Separation of Mixtures Practical Test” Academic Journals. 2 (6).

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Suhandana, Anggun. 2012. Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Suryabrata, S. 2000. Pengujian Signifikansi Hipotesis Nol dalam penelitian Psikologis. Buletin Psikologi, 8(2). 23-32.

Ruiz-Primo, Maria Araceli & Furtak, Erin Marie. 2007. "Exploring Teachers' Informal Formative Assessment Practices and Students' Understanding in the Context of Scientific Inquiry”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (1)

Windschitl, Mark Ronal. 2004. “Inquiry-Based Science in the Middle Grades: Assessment of Learning in Urban Systemic Reform”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022



  Lisensi Creative Commons
Copyright of the article is reserved by the author(s). Published by the Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung in Collaboration with the Physical Society of Indonesia (since 2019).  This article is an open-access article under the Creative Commons non-commercial-share-alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.