Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

ANALISIS HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA MENGGUNAKAN ONGOING ASSESSMENT TEKNIK IF-AT

Risdianto Parhat, Undang Rosidin, Abdurrahman -

Abstract


Assessment plays a very important role in improving student’s physics learning result. However, the less variety of assessment used by the teacher causes the low score of student’s physics learning result. One type of assessment used in the research that can increase student’s physics learning result is Ongoing Assessment IF-AT (Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique). This kind of as-sessment is not only applied when the learning is over, but also done continuously when the learning process happens, that are: at the beginning of learning, whilst learning, and at the end of the learning process. This research also supported by Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. Objective of this research are to know the influence score of Ongoing Assessment IF-AT technique toward score of student’s physics learning result through PBL model. The data score of Ongoing Assessment IF-AT technique is obtained from the average score of multiple-choice test of IF-AT technique conducted from 3 meetings, while the data score of learning result is obtained from cross-technique multiple-choice test conducted in the last meet-ing. Research results show that there is a positive linear influence score of Ongo-ing Assessment IF-AT technique toward score of student’s physics learning result through PBL model.
Keywords : Score of learning result, score of ongoing assessment IF-AT technique,
Problem Based Learning (PBL) model.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Chapman, Carolyn dan Rita King. 2005.

Differentiated Assessment Strate-gies-One Tools Doesn’t Fit All. California: Corwin Press INC.

Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. 2001.

Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: Impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001

Djamarah, Saiful Bahri & Aswan Zain.

Eds. Revisi. Strategi Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Epstein, Mike. 2001. What is the IF-

AT?. Diunduh pada tanggal 15 Oktober

dari http://www.epsteineducation.com/home/about/default.aspx

Hamalik, Umar. 2009. Proses Belajar

Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Joslin, Cara. 2010. Teaching for

Understanding: Ongoing

Assessment. Harvard University Graduate School of Education and Project Zero. June 2010. Tina Blythe. Diunduh pada tanggal 18 Oktober 2012. dari

http://www.learner.org/workshops/socialstudies/pdf/session7/7.On

goingAssessment.pdf

Kumala, Siti Ayu. 2011. Implementasi

Ongoing Assessment Berbasis Reciprocal Teaching Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Metakognisi Dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa. Skripsi. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. 2001.

Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Diunduh pada tanggal 28 Februari 2013. dari http://dwb4.unl.edu/dwb/Research/MB/MasonBruning.html

Saputra, Arif. 2011. Keterampilan

Proses Sains Siswa Antara Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5 Fase (LC 5F) dengan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL). Skripsi. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

Shute, Valerie J. 2007. Focus on

Formatif Feedback. Diunduh pada tanggal 28 Februari 2013. dari http://ets.org/Media/Research/.../RR-07-11.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika PMIPA FKIP Unila