Development of HOTS Assessment Instruments on Newton's Law of Motion by Using Multiple Types of Problems in High School Physics Lessons

Novinta Nurulsari, Undang Rosidin, Eneng Vera Dwi Indriyani

Abstract


This study aims to determine the criteria for questions with the type of matchmaking, reasoned plural choice, and causality that can increase HOTS on Newton's Law material about high school physics motion. This research was conducted at MAN 2 Tangerang by using class X, which consisted of two classes. The product developed from this research is the Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) test instrument using Research and Development. The test instruments used were matchmaking, reasoned plural choice, and causality on Newton's Laws of motion in high school physics lessons. Data collection techniques in this development use a questionnaire and Newton's Law of Motion test. The data obtained in the study were analyzed using the Rasch model with the help of Ministep 4.5.1 software. The results showed that the test instrument for higher-order thinking skills on Newton's Law of motion material uses information, pictures, graphics, or data to solve problems, describe information in detail, relate one concept to another, and look for links from different information. can train students' higher-order thinking skills.

 

Keywords: HOTS, Rasch Model, Newton's Laws of Motion

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpf.v9.n2.202101


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, A.N. & Widayati, A. (2012). Analisis Butir Soal Tes Kendali Mutu Kelas XII SMA Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi di Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 10(1): 1-26.

Anderson, L.W., dan Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, In.

Annuuru, T. A., Johan, R.C., & Ali, M. (2017). Peninkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dalam Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Treffinger. Edutcehnologia, 3(2): 136-144.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. 344 hlm.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta. Hlm. 129

Bialik, M., Bogan, M., Fadel, C., & Horvathova, M. (2015). Character education for the 21st century: What should students learn. Boston, Massachusetts: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Bima, A. (2019). SISTEM INFORMASI PENILAIAN K13 DI SMP NEGERI 2 WEDI (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Widya Dharma).

Boone, W.J., Staver, J.R., & Yale, M.S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Science. Dordrecht: Springer.498 p.

Borg, W.R & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction,. Fifth Edition. Newyork: Longman.

Crawford., Caroline, M., Evelyn.(2002). Focusing Upon Higher Order Thinking Skills: Webquests and The Learner-Centered Mathematical Learning Environment. Texas: ERIC. 16 hlm.

Daryanto. (2010). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 236 hlm.

Hamdi, S., Suganda, I. A., & Hayati, N. (2018). Developing higher-order thinking skill (HOTS) test instrument using Lombok local cultures as contexts for junior secondary school mathematics. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(2), 126-135.

Heru, M., & Suparno, S. (2019). The Development of Reasoned Multiple Choice Test in Interactive Physics Mobile Learning Media (PMLM) of Work and Energy Material to Measure High School Students’ HOTS. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 9(2).

Ku, K. Y. (2009). Assessing students’ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking skills and creativity, 4(1), 70-76.

Lewy, Z., & Aisyah, N. 2009. Pengembangan Soal untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pokok Bahasan Barisan dan Deret Bilangan di Kelas IX Akselerasi SMP Xaverius Maria Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 8(2): 15-28.

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing

Matondang, Z. (2009). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Suatu Instrumen Penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa, 6(1): 87-97.

Nirwana, N., Rochman, S., & Zukmadini, A. Y. (2019, April). An assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Based on Rasch Models of Student in Physics Learning. In International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018). Atlantis Press.

Putri, F. S., Istiyono, E., & Nurcahyanto, E. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen tes keterampilan berpikir kritis dalam bentuk pilihan ganda beralasan (politomus) di DIY. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5(2), 76-84.

Rahmawati, N.D., Amintoko, G., & Faizah, S. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fungsi Pembangkit. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(1): 21-31.

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, A., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215.

Rofiah, E.,Aminah, N.S., & Ekawati, E.Y. (2013). Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2):17-22.

Sinaga, T. (2015). Pengembangan soal model PISA mata pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam terpadu konten fisika untuk mengetahui penalaran siswa kelas IX. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(2), 194-196.

Solekhah, Fitri M., Maharta, N., & Suana, W. 2018. Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi pada Materi Hukum Newton tentang Gerak. Journal of Physics and Science Learning. 2(1): 17-26.

Sudaryono. (2013). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. 504 Hlm.

Sudjana, N. 2010. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. 180 hlm

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Permodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Trimkomunikata. 148 Hlm.

Susetyo, B. (2015). Prosedur Penyusunan & Analisis Tes: Untuk Penilaian Hail Belajar Bidang Kognitif. Bandung : Refika Aditama. 438 hlm.

Trianto. (2013). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group.

Utari, J. I., & Ermawati, F. U. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Berformat Four-Tier untuk Materi Suhu, Kalor dan Perpindahannya. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 07(03), 434–439.

Wardhani, D. F., dan Putra, A. P. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Standar Kognitif pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas 7 SMP Di Kabupaten Banjar. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 75-82).

Wibowo, A., & Cholifah, T. N. (2018). Instrumen tes tematik terpadu kurikulum 2013 berbasis PISA’s literacy bagi siswa sekolah dasar. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 2(2), 209-221.

Widhy, P. (2013). Integrative Science untuk Mewujudkan 21st Century Skill dalam Pembelajaran IPA SMP. In Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional MIPA UNY.

Yee, M. H., Yunos, J. M., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Tee, T. K., & Mohamad, M. M. (2015). Disparity of learning styles and higher order thinking skills among technical students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204:143-152.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  Lisensi Creative Commons
The Copyright is reserved to The Journal of Physics Learning (Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika) that is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.