Students’ Epistemic Game according to SOLO Taxonomy in Completing Fluid Mechanics Problem
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe the students’ epistemic game of high physics-capable. This study is qualitative. The participants are students taking fluid mechanics courses. The collect data of this study use fluid mechanics test, physics understanding test, and interview. The understanding test determines the students’ understanding level, while the determining students’ epistemic game by SOLO taxonomy uses the fluid mechanic's test. The students complete the first test by using mapping mathematics to meaning at a relational level and transliteration to mathematics at a multi structural level. Pictorial analysis in level extended abstract and transliteration to mathematics in level relational are used by the students in completing the problem of the second test. Meanwhile, this study result showed that mapping mathematics to the meaning and recursive plug and chug at a relational level is used by the students for completing the third test. Furthermore, the students completing the fourth test used transliteration to mathematics and recursive plug and chug at a relational level The students’ epistemic game by SOLO taxonomy of this study can be used to develop physics learning.
Keywords: epistemic game, SOLO taxonomy, fluid mechanics
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpf.v8.n2.202005
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Fatiah, F., Kaniawati, I. & Utari, S. 2015. Analisis Didaktik Pembelajaran yang dapat Meningkatkan Korelasi antara Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA pada Materi Fluida Dinamis. Jurnal Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 1 (1): 111-118.
Chen, Y., Irving, P. W. & Sayre, E. C. 2013. Epistemic Game for Answer Making in Learning about Hydrostatics. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 9 (1): 1-7.
Bancong H. & Subaer, S. 2013. Profil Penalaran Logis berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2 (2): 195-202.
Teodorescu, R. E., Bennhold, C., Feldman, G., & Medsker, L. 2013. New Approach to Analyzing Physics Problem: A Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problems. The American Physical Society, 9 (1):1-20.
Ogilvie, C. A. 2009. Change in Students’ Problem-Solving Strategies in A Course that Includes Context-Rich, Multifaceted Problems. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 5 (2): 1-14.
Tuminaro, J. & Redish, E. F. 2007. Element of A Cognitive Model of Physics Problem Solving: Epistemic Games. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 3 (2): 1-22.
Kamol N. & Har, Y. B. 2010. Upper Primary School Students’ Algebraic Thinking. Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 3–7) on July.
Miles M. B. & Huberman A. M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis (Second Edition). California: SAGE Publications.
Lian, L. H. & Yew, W. T. 2012. Assessing Algebraic Solving Ability: A Theoretical Framework. International Education Studies, 5 (6): 177-188.
Jamil, A. F. 2017. Peningkatan Level Berpikir Aljabar Siswa berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO pada Materi Persamaan Linier melalui Pemberian Scaffolding. Jurnal Ilmu Mandala Education, 3 (1): 175-183.
Appulembang, O. D. 2017. Profil Pemecahan Masalah Aljabar Berpandu pada Taksonomi Solo Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Makale Tana Toraja. Journal Language, Literature, Culture, and Education, 13 (2): 133-149.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020
Copyright of the article is reserved by the authors. Published by the Program Studi S1 Pendidikan Fisika, FKIP, Universitas Lampung in collaboration with the Physical Society of Indonesia (since 2019). This article is an open-access article under the Creative Commons non-commercial-share-alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). license.
.png)