Evaluative Studies of Project-Based Mathematical Learning: Reviewed from National Standard for Education Process in Indonesia

I Gusti Ngurah Pujawan, I Putu Pasek Suryawan, I Putu Wisna Ariawan

Abstract


Abstract: Evaluative Studies of Project-Based Mathematical Learning: Reviewed from National Standard for Education Process in Indonesia. Objectives: To describe the effectiveness of the implementation of project-based learning in junior high school mathematics learning in terms of process standards. Methods: This study adopted the CIPP evaluation model with state junior high school mathematics teachers as respondents.The analysis technique refers to the calculation of the T score in consultation with the Glickman quadrant prototype. Findings: T score for each variable, namely CIPP (plus minus plus plus) with a comparison for the Context variable: F plus (71.43 precent) and F minus (28.57) Inputs: F plus (28.57 pecent) and F minus (71.43 percent) Process: F plus (71.43 percent) and F- (28.57 percent), Product: F plus (71.43 percent) and F- (28.57 percent) with quite effective category. Conclusion: Project-based mathematics learning in terms of process standards is quite effective, and can be recommended to improve the quality of mathematics learning.

Keywords: evaluation of mathematical learning, project-based learning, process standards

Abstrak: Studi Evaluatif Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Projek: Ditinjau dari Standar Nasional untuk Proses Pendidikan di Indonesia. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan efektifitas penerapan pembelajaran berbasis projek pada pembelajaran matematika SMP ditinjau dari standar proses. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah studi evaluasi yang mengadopsi model evaluasi CIPP dengan responden guru matematika SMP negeri. Teknik analisis mengacu perhitungan skor T yang dikonsultasikan dengan prototipe kuadran Glickman. Temuan: Skor T untuk setiap variabel, yaitu CIPP (tambah kurang tambah tambah) dengan perbandingan untuk variabel Context: F tambah (71,43 persen) dan F- (28,57) Input: F tambah (28,57 persen) dan F- (71,43 persen) Process: F+ (71,43 persen) dan F- (28,57 persen), Product: F+ (71,43 persen) dan F- (28,57 persen) dengan kategori cukup efektif. Kesimpulan: Pembelajaran matematika berbasis projek ditinjau dari standar proses terlaksana cukup efektif, dan dapat direkomendasikan untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran matematika.

Kata kunci: evaluasi pembelajaran matematika, pembelajaran berbasis projek, standar proses.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i1.202218


Full Text:

PDF

References


Article in a Journal:

Abdurrahman. (2019). Research Article https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.403 European Journal of Educational Research Volume 11, Issue 1, 403 - 421. ISSN: 2165-8714 http://www.eu-jer.com/ Realistic Mathematics Education’s Effect on Students’ Performance and Attitudes: A Cas. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753–761.

Alkaabi, A. M., & Almaamari, S. A. (2020). Supervisory feedback in the principal evaluation process. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20504

Almonacid-Fierro, A., Vargas-Vitoria, R., De Carvalho, R. S., & Fierro, M. A. (2021). Impact on teaching in times of COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 432–440. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21129

Almutairi, T. S., & Shraid, N. S. (2021). Teacher evaluation by different internal evaluators: Head of departments, teachers themselves, peers and students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20838

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Stem) Project-Based Learning (Pbl) Affects High, Middle, and Low Achievers Differently: the Impact of Student Factors on Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0

Intasoi, S., Junpeng, P., Tang, K. N., Ketchatturat, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Developing an assessment framework of multidimensional scientific competencies. 9(4), 963–970. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20542

Kusaeri, Aditomo, A., Ridho, A., & Fuad, A. Z. (2017). SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN LEARNING AND STUDENT’ MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT IN INDONESIAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 4, 9–15.

Kusmaryono, I., Jupriyanto, & Kusumaningsih, W. (2021). Construction of students’ mathematical knowledge in the zone of proximal development and zone of potential construction. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.341

Lou, S.-J., Chung, C.-C., Dzan, W.-Y., & Shih, R.-C. (2012). Construction of A Creative Instructional Design Model Using Blended, Project-Based Learning for College Students. Creative Education, 03(07), 1281–1290. htts://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.37187

Naufal, M. A., Abdullah, A. H., Osman, S., Abu, M. S., Ihsan, H., & Rondiyah. (2021). Reviewing the Van Hiele model and the application of metacognition on geometric thinking. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21185

Palinussa, A. L., Molle, J. S., & Gaspersz, M. (2021). Realistic mathematics education: Mathematical reasoning and communication skills in rural contexts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20640

Parwati, N. N., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2020). Effectiveness of the implementation of cognitive conflict strategy assisted by e-service learning to reduce students’ mathematical misconceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I11.11802

Setiawan, J., Sudrajat, A., & Kumalasari, D. (2021). Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history. 10(2). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20796

Suarsana, I. M., Mahayukti, G. A., Sudarma, I. K., & Pujawan, A. A. G. S. (2019). The Effect of Interactive Mathematics Learning Media toward Mathematical Conceptual Understanding on Probability of Hearing-impaired Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1165(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1165/1/012021

Syahrial, Asrial, Maison, Mukminin, A., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2020). Ethnoconstructivism analysis: Study of pedagogic mathematics competence of primary school teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 614–624. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20256

Articles in Bahasa

Abi, A. M. (2017). Integrasi Etnomatematika Dalam Kurikulum Matematika Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v1i1.75

Ardiyanti, N. M. D., Mahayukti, G. A., & Sugiarta, I. M. (2020). Evaluasi Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Secara Daring di SMAN Kota Singaraja. Jurnal IKA, 18(2), 136–157.

Chairunnisa, D., A, T. S., & Firmansyah, M. I. (2020). Implementasi PERMENDIBUD NO 22 TAHUN 2016 Tentang Stndar Proses dalamPembelajaran PAI di SMP Inovatatif AL-IBDA’. 18 No. I(22), 53–64.

Dahono, A. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Pada Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Menggunakan Model Cipp di MTS Negeri Jember III (Issue 8.5.2017).

Dantes, N., Suarni, N. K., Studi, P., Pendidikan, M., Pascasarja, P., Ganesha, U. P., Pascasarja, P., & Ganesha, U. P. (2013). STUDI EVALUASI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN PROJECT BASED LEARNING DITINJAU DARI STANDAR PROSES PADA SEKOLAH Program Studi Managemen Pendidikan , Program Pascasarja Program Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan , Program Pascasarja. 4(5).

Dewi, P. U. K., Mahayukti, G. A., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran treffinger terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari kecerdasan logis matematis siswa. Math Didactic : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 168–182.

Doyok, R. (2021). Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Mengevaluasi Program Tahfiz Selama Daring di SMP Islam Al-Ishlah Bukittinggi. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 7(3), 73. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v7i3.429

Dwi Ferdiani, R. (2020). Activist Learners’ Creative Thinking Processes in Posing and Solving Geometry Problem. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1635–1647.

Erman, S. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Mustagfiroh, S. (2020). Konsep “ Merdeka Belajar ” Perspektif Aliran Progresivisme di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 141–147.

Nuh, Z. M., & Dardiri. (2017). Etnomatematika Dalam Sistem Pembilangan Pada Masyarakat Melayu Riau. Kutubkhanah, 19(2), 220–238. http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/Kutubkhanah/article/view/2552

Putu Pasek Suryawan, I. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Otentik dengan Pendekatan Induktif-Deduktif. 14(1), 1858–0629.

Rudhito, M. A., & Prasety, D. A. B. (2016). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model Timss Untuk Mendukung Pembelajaran Matematika Smp Kelas Vii Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.8370

Sri, T., & Asih, N. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Ditinjau dari Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa pada Model Concept Attainment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 217–224.

Sugiri, W. A., & Priatmoko, S. (2020). Persprektif Asesmen Autentik Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Dalam Merdeka Belajar. At-Thullab : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v4i1.119

Sugiyanto, S., Kartowagiran, B., & Jailani, J. (2015). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Di Smp Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4558

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif untuk penelitian yang bersifat: eksploratif,enterpretif,interaktif dan konstruktif. Alfabeta.

Syahrul Azmi, Hapipi, I. S. (2019). pelatihan penyususnan dan pengembangan RPP menurut permendikbud no. 22 tahun 2016 bagi guru-guru SD gugus II ampenan utara. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Tyas, L., Jalinu, J., & Suanto, E. S. (2014). Penerapan Project Based Learning (Pjbl) untuk Menigkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Vii4 SMP Babussalam Pekanbaru. Neliti.Com, 1–11. https://www.neliti.com/publications/205715/penerapan-project-based-learning-pjbl-untuk-menigkatkan-hasil-belajar-matematika

Yuniarti, Abdiyah, L., Nurjanah, S., Siregar, S. L., & Riani, P. (2021). Penelitian Evaluatif dalam Pendidikan. 1(1), 73–87.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.