Email this article Metode Role Playing dalam Pembelajaran Profesi Kependidikan
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the influence of the role playing method on student learning outcomes and activities. This research was conducted on the students of English Education Study Program of Indraprasta PGRI University in the first semester used Classroom Action Research (PTK) method, which was consisted of 65 students. Data collected techniques used observation and evaluation. The results showed that the role playing method gave a significant influence in the lecturing education proffesion subject. In other words, the student’s learning outcomes and activity were increasing. These results can be seen from each cycle, 72% for the first cycle and 86% for the second cycle.
Keywords: role playing, educational profession, classroom action research.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh yang diberikan dari metode role playing pada proses pembelajaran profesi kependidikan dilihat, dari hasil pembelajaran yang dicapai serta keaktifan mahasiswa. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Indraprasta PGRI semester I (satu) dengan menggunakan metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) yang berjumlah 65 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitiani ini adalah observasi dan evaluasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode role playing memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan dalam proses perkuliahan profesi kependidikan. Dengan kata lain, keaktifan dan hasil belajar mahasiswa meningkat saat diterapkan metode ini. Hasil ini terlihat pada capaian yang ditempuh pada setiap siklus. Pada siklus I tingkat pencapaian belajar mahasiswa mencapai 72% dan pada siklus II mencapai 86%.
Kata Kunci: role playing, profesi kependidikan, penelitian tindakan kelas.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blatner, A. (2000). Foundation of Psycodra- ma Histrory: theory and practice (4th Ed.). New York: Springer.
Bosse, H. M., Nickel, M., et al. (2015). Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: A comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect. BMC Medical Education, 10(1), 27.
Brislin, T. (2016). Active learning in applied ethics instruction. Journal on Excellence in College, 6(3), 161-167.
Brown, K. M. (2017). Using role-play to integrate ethics into the business curriculum: A financial management example. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(2), 105-110.
Brummel, B. J., Gunsalus, C. K., et al. (2015). Development of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(3), 573-589.
Bucciarelli, L. L. (2017). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 141-149.
Hand, S. R., Friedman, D. S., et al. (2010). Effect of patient-centered communication training on discussion and detection of non adherence in glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 117(7), 1339-1399.
Herkert, J. R. (2012). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 403-414.
Herkert, J. R. (2015). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 373-385.
Hudspith, R. C. (2013). Broadening the scope of engineering ethics—from micro-ethics to macro-ethics. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 11(5), 208-211.
Hudspith, R. C. (2015). Macroethics in an engineering program. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 13(5), 268-272.
Johnson, W. B., & Corser, R. (2012). Learning ethics the hard way: Facing the ethics committee. Teaching of Psychology, 25(1), 26-28.
Kopecky-Wenzel, M., & Frank, R. (2010). A video based training in communication skills for physicians. Praxis der Kinder- psychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 59(3), 207-223.
Lloyd, P., & van de Poel, I. (2011). Designing games to teach ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 433-447.
Maier, H. R., Baron, J., et al. (2017). Using online roleplay simulations for teaching sustainability principles to engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(6), 1162¬1171.
Paskins, Z., & Peile, E. (2010). Final year medical students' views on simulation-based teaching: A comparison with the Best
Evidence Medical Education Systematic Review. Medical Teacher, 32(7), 569¬577.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223¬231.
Raisner, J. A. (2017). Using the ''ethical environment'' paradigm to teach business ethics: The case of the maquiladoras. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12), 1331-1346.
Rosnow, R. L. (2014). Teaching research ethics through role-play and discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 17(3), 179-181.
Schellhorn, A., & Possl, J. (2010). Social skills training after brain injury-patient satisfaction and outcome ratings by patients, relatives and therapists. Zeitschrift Fur Neuro- psychologie, 21(2), 71-81.
Silberman, M. (Ed.). (2007). The handbook of experiential learning. San Francisco: Wiley/Pfeiffer.
Springer, L., Stanne, M., et al. (2015). Effects of small-group learning on under-graduates in science, mathematics, enginering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-52.
Van de Poel, I. R., Zandvoort, H., et al. (2016). Ethics and engineering courses at Delft University of Technology: Contents, educational setup and experiences. Science and engineering athics, 7(2), 267-282
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.