Implementation of The Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Cooperative Model to Practice Student Collaboration and Communication Skills on Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solutions Materials

Lathifatul Hikmah, Rudiana Agustini

Abstract


The right learning model can train students' collaboration skills and communication skills during the learning process. This study aims to describe the implementation of learning through the application of the STAD type cooperative learning model on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions and to describe students' collaboration and communication skills during learning. This study uses a pre-experimental method with a research design that is a one-shot case study. The target of this research is the students of class X IPA 2 at SMAN 14 Surabaya with 36 students. The results of this study are 1) The implementation of the syntax of the STAD cooperative learning model at the first meeting got an average percentage score of 96.5% and at the second meeting it was 93.6%, both of which were in the very good category . 2) Students' collaboration skills at the first meeting had an average percentage score of 89.5% and at the second meeting it was 94.5%, both of which were in the very good category. 3) Students' communication skills include the quantity and quality of questioning and opinionating skills. The percentage of quantity scores asking and giving opinions at meetings 1 and 2, respectively, is 47% and 87%. The quality of asking students who obtained good criteria at meeting 1 was 13.89% and at meeting 2 was 16.67%, the percentage of quality opinion of students who obtained good criteria during 2 meetings was 22.22% and 41.67%. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that a cooperative learning model like STAD can train students' cooperation and communication skills, which is indicated by an increase in cooperation skills. and student  communication  during 2 academic meetings and were included in the good category.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jppk.v11.i1.2022.07


Full Text:

PDF

References


Danggus, G. (2020). Penerapan Pembelajaran Tipe STAD untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Kelas XI MIPA SMAN 2 Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains, 9(1), 28-36.

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integratedcurriculum as an Effective Way to Teach21st Century Capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31-50.

Ibraheem, T. L. (2011). Effects of two modes of student teams – achievement division strategies on senior secondary school students’ learning outcomes in chemical kinetics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2).

Isjoni. (2012). Pembelajaran Kooperatif: Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Komunikasi antar Peserta Didik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Junita, & Wardani, K. W. (2020). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran STAD dan CIRC terhadap Peningkatan Keterampilan Kolaborasi Siswa Kelas V SD Gugus Joko Tingkir pada Mata Pelajaran Tematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 5(1), 11-17.

Kriswintari, D., Yuanita, L., & Widodo, W. (2018). Fostering students’ thinking skill and social attitude through STAD cooperative learning technique on tenth grade students of chemistry class. Journal of Physics.

Noor, A. J., & Husna, R. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2).

Rahmawati, A., Fadiawati, N., & Diawati, C. (2019). Analisis Keterampilan Berkolaborasi Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Daur Ulang Minyak Jelantah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 8(2).

Riduwan. (2011). Skala Pengukuran Variabel - Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rusman. (2012). Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Rusman. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Scott, C. (2015). The Futures of Learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century? . Paris: UNESCO Education Research and Foresight.

Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1987). Training Teachers for Cooperative Learning. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 20-25.

Siahaan, M. M., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2018). The Difference of Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability Taught by Cooperative Learning Model Think Talk Write Type and Numbered Head Together Type. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 8(3).

Subhayni, Sa'adiah, & Armia. (2017). Keterampilan Berbicara. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press.

Sudjana, N. (2002). Dasar‐ dasar proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono. (2013). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wijaya, H., & Arismunandar. (2018). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbasis Media Sosial. Jurnal Jaffray, 16(2), 175-196.

Yassin, A. A., Razak, N. A., & Maasum, N. R. (2018). Cooperative Learning: General and Theoretical Background. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(8).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.