Blended Learning in Increasing Learning Activeness of UNJA Student
Abstract
Abstract: Blended Learning in Increasing Learning Activeness of UNJA Student . The research aims to: To improve the effectiveness of Blended Learning in improving learning activity in students UNJA. This type of research is quantitative research with Pre Experiment Draft research with model The One Group Pretest-Posttest. In this study drifting will focus on one group and then in the group at the initial stage will be given an initial test (pre-Test), then given the treatment and after the treatment will be carried out last Test (posttest), hereinafter from the comparison of the initial test (pre-Test) with the last Test (posttest). Analysis results proved that there is a blended learning (X) influence on the learning activity of tutoring and counseling (Y) students. These findings are obtained based on a series of data analysis that shows that the effectiveness of blended learning to the activation of students learned from the results of the difference Pree test of post-test amounted to 36.91%. The result of hypothetical test results that showed the effectiveness of blended learning to the activation of students learned the truth. It shows that more and more combinations of methods with props will influence the active student learning.
Keywords: Blended Learning, learning activity.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A.M, Sardiman. 2010. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Anurrahman. 2012. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Arikunto. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bloodgood, R. A. 2012. Active learning: A small group histology laboratory exercise in a whole class setting utilizing virtual slides and peer education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(6), 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1294
Cavanagh, A. J., Aragón, O. R., Chen, X., Couch, B. A., Durham, M. F., Bobrownicki, A., ... & Graham, M. J. 2017. Student buy-in to active learning in a college science course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar76. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0212
Cepi Riyana. 2009. Teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pendidikan. Bandung : Saraba Oancakarya Nusa.
Cooper, K. M., Ashley, M., & Brownell, S. E. 2017. A bridge to active learning: A summer bridge program helps students maximize their active-learning experiences and the active-learning experiences of others. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(1), ar17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-05-0161
Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. 2018. The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0123-6
Departemen Pendidikan Indonesia. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:
Balai Pustaka.
du Rocher, A. R. 2018. Active learning strategies and academic self-efficacy relate to both attentional control and attitudes towards plagiarism. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418765515
Extavour & Gillin. 2018. Students’ perceptions of a blended learning pharmacy seminarcourse in a Caribbean school of pharmacy. The University of the west Indies, Tobago & Trinidad. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.007
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. 2017. Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.003
Hamzah B. Uno dan Nurdin Muhammad. 2011. Belajar Dengan Pendekatan PAILKEM Jakarta, PT Bumi Aksara
Han & Robert. 2019. Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.002Get
Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. 2019. The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9(4), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276
Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E.E., & Sumarmo, U. 2017. Hard Skills dan Soft Skills Matematik Siswa. Penerbit: Refika Aditama. Bandung.
Houseknecht, J. B., Bachinski, G. J., Miller, M. H., White, S. A., & Andrews, D. M. 2020. Effectiveness of the active learning in organic chemistry faculty development workshops. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 387-398. DOI: 10.1039/C9RP00137A
Hunt, K. 2019. Zombies, Gender, and Student Active Learning. Journal of Political Science Education, 15(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1487303
Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. 2017. Students' Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108-118. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe
Isti'anah, A. 2017. The effect of blended learning to the students’ achievement in grammar class. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 4(1), 16-30. DOI: 10.15408/ijee.v4i1.5697
Kemendikbud. 2014. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Nomor 58, Tahun 2014, tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) / Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs).
Kitchens, B., Means, T., & Tan, Y. 2018. Captivate: Building blocks for implementing active learning.Journal of Education for Business, 93(2), 58 73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1417232
Koretsky, M. D., Brooks, B. J., & Higgins, A. Z. 2016. Written justifications to multiple-choice concept questions during active learning in class. International Journal of Science Education, 38(11), 1747-1765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1214303
Kusumoto, Y. 2018. Enhancing critical thinking through active learning. Language Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2018-0003
Lim, S. C. R., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. 2011. Critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: An investigation of student facilitation techniques. New Horizons in Education, 59(1), 52-65. http://www.hkta1934.org.hk/NewHorizon/index2.html
Lin, C.-Y., Huang, C.-K., & Ko, C.-J. 2020. The impact of perceived enjoyment on team effectiveness and individual learning in a blended learning business course: The mediating effect of knowledge sharing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4446
Mui, M. L. S., Carpio, G. A. C., & Ong, C. M. 2019. Evaluation of Engagement in Learning within Active Learning Classrooms: Does Novelty Make a Difference?. Journal of Learning Spaces, 8(2), 1-11. http://libjournal.uncg.edu/
Munir. 2017. Pembelajaran Digital. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Nicol, A. A., Owens, S. M., Le Coze, S. S., MacIntyre, A., & Eastwood, C. (2018). Comparison of high-technology active learning and low-technology active learning classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1487303
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. 2020. Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1
Pour, A. N., Herayanti, L., & Sukroyanti, B. A. 2018. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa. e-Saintika, 2(1), 36-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v6i01.2325
Purwitasari, D. I., Astawa, I. W. P., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. 2019. Penerapan blended learning berbantuan schoology untuk meningkatkan keaktifan dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII A1 SMP Negeri 6 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesia, 8(2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppm.v8i2
Sari, E, C. 2016. Penerapan Model Blended Learning untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar pada Mata Pelajaran TIK: Studi Kasus di Kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 2 Salatiga. Salatiga: UKSW. https://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/13996
Sawyer, J. E., Obeid, R., Bublitz, D., Schwartz, A. M., Brooks, P. J., & Richmond, A. S. 2017. Which forms of active learning are most effective: Cooperative learning, writing-to-learn, multimedia instruction, or some combination?. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(4), 257. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000095
Sofyan dan Andi. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Nht (Numbered Heads Together) Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa kelas XI IPS 1 SMAN 8 Makassar. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/sosialisasi/article/view/12220
Strayer, J. F., Gerstenschlager, N. E., Green, L. B., Mccormick, N., McDaniel, S., & Rowell, G. H. 2019. Toward a Full (er) Implementation of Active Learning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 18(1). http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/
Sudjana, Nana. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Cetakan Ke 25. Jakarta : PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Susanto. 2020. Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi di Madrasah Alyah Putreri. Pekan baru: UIN SUSKA Riau.
Usman, Husaini. (2011). Manajemen. Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara
Uwes A. Chaeruman. (2017). Pengembangan Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran Blended Untuk Program Spada Indonesia. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Yusuf, A. Muri. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan.Padang: UNP Press.
Wahyuningsih, dian. (2013). Implementasi Blended Learning by the Constructive Approach (BLCA) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Matakuliah Interaksi Manusia dan Komputer Prodi Teknologi Pendidikan FIP UNY.S2 thesis, UNY. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/11804/
Wang, Y. H. (2020). Design-based research on integrating learning technology tools into higher education classes to achieve.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.