Pengembangan Asesmen Tes Tulis Berbasis Tematik Terpadu pada Kelas V Sekolah Dasar

Aminah Aminah, Rocmiyati Rocmiyati, Een Yayah Haenillah

Abstract

This research aims are to develop an integrated thematic primary school themed test assessment and to know the difficulty level, differentiation, distractor, validity and reliability. The research population were V grade students of Primary School, Pringsewu District, SDN 1 Banyuwangi, SDN Wayakrui and SDN 8 Bandungbaru. This research used Research and Developmet method with the steps according to Borg & Gall. The data collection tool used questionnaires and tests. Data analysis techniques by expert validation and test instruments are analyzed with the validity, reliability, difficulty, differentiation, and distractor. The validation assessment results, material and linguistic experts on question instruments are developed very well, and are worthy of use. The results of large-scale test of product development and usage test shows that the instrument result has good quality that can be used to measure students' cognitive abilities

Tujuan penelitian mengembangkan asesmen tes tulis berbasis tematik terpadu Sekolah Dasar dan mengetahui tingkat kesukaran, daya beda, analisis pengecoh, validitas dan reliabilitas. Populasi penelitian siswa kelas V SD di Kabupaten Pringsewu, sampel penelitian SDN 1 Banyuwangi, SDN Wayakrui dan SDN 8 Bandungbaru. Penelitian menggunakan metode Research and Developmet dengan tahap menurut Borg & Gall. Alat pengumpulan data menggunakan angket dan tes. Teknik analisis data dengan validasi ahli dan instrumen tes yang dianalisis dengan validitas butir soal, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya beda, dan pengecoh. Hasil validasi ahli asesmen, materi dan bahasa terhadap instrumen soal yang dikembangkan sangat baik, dan layak digunakan. Hasil ujicoba skala besar produk hasil pengembangan dan uji pemakaian menunjukan hasil instrumen soal mempunyai kualitas baik, dapat digunakan untuk mengukur kognitif siswa.

Kata kunci: asesmen, tes tulis, tematik terpadu

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ainul, Uyuni Taufiq. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Kognitif Berbasis Revisi Taksonomi Bloom pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi untuk Siswa SMA. Jurnal Biotek. Vol.3, no.2, hal.1-17

Anderson, Lorin W. 2003. Classroom Assment Enhancing the Qulity Of Teacher Decision Malaing NewJersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

Anesa, Surya.(2016). Developing Formatif Authentic Assessment Instruments Based on Learning Trajectory for Elementary School. Journal Research and Evaluation in Education. Vol.2, no.1, hal. 13-24

Borg, W. R & Gall, MD. 1983. Educational Research: An Introduction (4rd). New York & London: Logman Inc.

Gede Sarotama, Cokorda. 2014. Pengaruh Pendekatan Kontekstual dan Asesmen Autentik terhadap Kemampuan Menulis dalam Bahasa Inggris pada SMPN 1 Payangan. journal practics and education. Vol.2, nomor 2.hal. 67-79

Calvin Smith. 2014. Assessment of Student Outcomes from Work-Integrated Learning: Validity and Reliability. Asia-Pasific Journal of Cooperative Education. Volume 1 no.16 hal 210-223.

David Booth. 1998. Guiding the Reading Process: Techniques and Strategies for Successful Instruction in K-8 Classrooms. Pembroke Publishers Limited.

Depdiknas, 2003. Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas RI.

Drake,S.M & Burns,RC. 2004. Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum. Alexandria Virginia: ASCD

Dimyati & Mudjiono. 2013. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Elizabeth A Bery. 2015. Work Integrated Learning: What do the Students Want? A Qualitative Study of Health Sciences Students Experiences of a Non-Competency Based Placement. Adelaide, Australia: Flinders University

Fogarty, R. 1991. How to Intergrate the Curricula. Palatine Illinois: IRI/Skylight Publishing.inc

Huba dan Freed. 2000. Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. Pearson

Jo Anne,Schudt Caldwell. 2008. Comprehension Assessment: A Classroom Guide. New York: The Guilford Press.

Joy Cumming dan Graham S. Maxwell. 1999. Contextualising Authentic Assessment. Principles, Policies, and Practices. Vol.2, no.6, halaman 177-194

Karli, H. 2003. Head, Head, Heart. Bandung: Bina Media Informasi

Kemendikbud. 2014. Tema 7 Sejarah Peradaban Indonesia Buku Guru Kelas 5

Kunandar. 2013. Penelitian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Mulyasa. 2013. Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Muslich, Masnur. 2011. Authentic Assessment :Penelitian Berbasis Kelas dan Kopetensi. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama

Nana Syaodeh Sukmadinata. 2010. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Berbasis Budaya untuk Meningkatkan Apresiasi Siswa terhadap Budaya Lokal. Journal practics and education, Vol.2, no. 5, hal.1-15

Panjaburee, Srisawardi. 2016. An Integrated Learning Styles and Scientific Investigation-Based Personalized Web Aproach: A Result on Conceptual Learning Achievements and Percepitions of High School Student. Journal of Computers in Education. Vol.1, no.16, hal.13-24

Permendikbud. 2014. Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Kelas 5. Jakarta: Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan

Permendikbud RI Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penelitian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Pigdon, K. & Woolley, M. 1992. The Big Picture. Chap 1 3. Victoria: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.

Pomham, W, James. 1995. Classroom Assessment : What Feachers Need to Know: USA: Allyndanbaeon A Simondan Schuster Company

Purnomo,Edy. 2016. Dasar-Dasar dan Perancangan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Media akademi

Purwanti, Muslikah. (2014). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Mata Pelajaran Akuntansi Keuangan Menggunakan Microsoft Office Exel 2010. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia. Vol.12, no.1, hal.81-94

Hartanto, Rudi. 2014. Kualitas Instrumen Asesmen Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 untuk Menilai Materi Ekologi SMA. e-journal.Unesa.ac.id. Vol.3, no.3. hal.1-15

Rusli Lutan. 1994. The Victorian Primary School System and Possible Application In The Indonesian Setting. Melbourne: Victoria.

Saifudin. Azwar. 2016. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar

Santrock, Jhon W. 2007. Masa Perkembangan Anak. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika

Siti Fatonah, Pujiati Suyata, Kun Prasetyo Z. 2013. Developing an Authentic Assessment Model in Elementari School Science Teaching. Journal of Education and Practice. Volume 4, nomor 13, hal.1-16

Sugiyono. 2007. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualikatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta

Sugiyono. 2013. Statistika untuk Penelitian, Bandung: Alfabeta

Shavelson, Richard. 2007. The Collegiate Learning Assessment. Ford Policy Forum 2008: Forum for the Future of Higher Education. New York: The Guilford Press

Suwartono, Christiany (2014). Development and Reliability of The Indonesian Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale- Fourth Edition. Scientific Research. Psychology. Vol.5, no.1, hal.1611-1619

Sylker, Teles, Tomimatsu, Kiyoshi. 2014. Contextual Teaching and Learning Using A Card Game Interface. International Journal of Asia Digital Art and Desain. Vol.6, no.1, hal.18-23.

Triyanto 2010. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Trianto. 2011. Mengembangkan Model Pembelajaran Tematik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka

Wiley, Flores. 2002. Assessing Adult Learning for University of Phoenix. USA: John Wiley & Sons

Wulandari, Annisa. 2015. Evaluasi Implementasi Model Penilaian Otentik dalam Kurikulum 2013 di SMKN 1 Banyudono.Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia. Vol.4, no.11, hal.1-14.

Zainul, A. 2001. Alternative Assessment. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960%2Fpedagogi.v5i14.13645

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.