PENGEMBANGAN BUKU AJAR LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NON ELEKTROLIT BERBASIS REPRESENTASI KIMIA

Anung Prasetya, Noor Fadiawati, Lisa Tania

Abstract


This researchaimedtodevelop a electrolyte solution and non electrolytes textbookbased onchemical representation; describe the characteristics of a electrolyte solution and non electrolytes textbookbased on chemical representation;describe the teachersresponsesand studentsresponse toaelectrolyte solution and non electrolytes textbookbased onchemicalrepresentation; andknowthe support factor and obstaclesencountered whendeveloping a electrolyte solution and non electrolytes textbookbased onchemicalrepresentation. This researchused theResearchandDevelopment method. The result showed that based on teacher response the surtability content and curriculum of textbook was very high (91,67%), the graphity aspect/ the attractiveness was very high (94%), and levels of legibility was very high (90,98%).

 Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan buku ajar larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit berbasis representasi kimia; mendeskripsikan karakteristik buku ajar larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit berbasis representasi kimia; mendeskripsikan tanggapan guru dan siswa terhadap buku ajar larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit berbasis representasi kimia; dan mengetahui factor pendukung dan kendala-kendala yang dihadapi ketika mengembangkan buku ajar larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit berbasis representasi kimia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Dari hasil tanggapan guru diperoleh data bahwa pada aspek kesesuaian isi buku ajar kimia dengan kurikulum sangat tinggi sebesar 91,67%, aspek grafika/kemenarikan sangat tinggi sebesar 94% dan tingkat keterbacaan sangat tinggi sebesar 90,98%.

Kata kunci: buku ajar, larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit, representasi kimia


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adisendjaja, Y.H. 2007. Analisis Buku Ajar Sains berdasarkan Literasi Ilmiah sebagai Dasar Untuk memilih Buku Ajar Sains (Biologi). Disampaikan dalam Seminar Pendidikan Nasional di Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FMIPA. 25-26 Mei 2007. UPI.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2006. Standar Proses Mata Pelajaran Kimia SMA/MA. BSNP. Jakarta.

Borg, W.R. and M. D. Gall. 2003. Educational Research. Allyn and Bacon. United States of America.

Chittleborough, G. D. 2004. The Role of Teaching Models and Chemical Representations in Developing students’ Metal Models of Chemical Phenomena. Curtin University of Technology.

Chittleborough, G. D. & Treagust D.F. 2007. The modeling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8:274-292.

Farida, I., Liliasari, D.H. Widyantoro, dan W. Sopandi. 2010. Representational competence’s profile of pre-service chemistry teachers in chemical problem solving. Seminar Proceding the Fourth International Seminar on Science Education. 30 October 2010. Bandung. C2-2.

Johnstone, A. H. 1982. Macro- and Micro-Chemistry, School Science Review., 227, No. 64. p. 377-379.

Sukmadinata, N. S. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakary.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan “Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D”. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Treagust, D. F. 2008. The Role of Multiple Representations in Learning Science: Enhancing Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Motivation. In Yew-Jin And Aik-Ling (Eds).Science Education At The Nexus Of Theory And Practice. Sense Publishers. p. 7-23. Rotterdam – Taipei


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.