Email this article Comparative Analysis of Creative Assignments, Participatory Collaborative Learning, and Students’ Satisfaction in Digital & Non-Digital Learning Media
Abstract
Abstract: Study Comparative of Creative Assignments, Participatory Collaborative Learning, and Learning Satisfaction in Digital & Non-Digital Learning Media.Objectives: This study aims to comparative of creative assignments, Participatory Collaborative Learning, and learning satisfaction in Digital & Non-Digital Learning. Methods: The study employed experimental and survey methods with a sample of seven State Aliyah Madrasah schools in East Jakarta. Each school consisted of two groups using digital learning media and two groups using non-digital media, randomly selected in the twelfth grade. Research instruments were previously tested for validity and reliability, and data analysis was conducted using the mean difference test (t-test). Findings: The findings are: (1) The creative assignment results in the group using digital media are higher than the non-digital media. (2) The participatory-collaborative learning activity is more active in the group using non-digital media than the digital media. (3) The student learning satisfaction in the group using non-digital media is higher than the digital media. Conclusion: This indicates that both digital and non-digital learning media have their respective advantages and disadvantages. Teachers are required to design creative tasks that follow learning objectives because different learning objectives will produce different learning outcomes even though the learning media is the same. Teachers must focus on determining the learning objectives of creative assignments and selecting the appropriate media.
Keywords: creative assignment, participatory collaborative learning, learning satisfaction, digital and non-digital media.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i3.2024129
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, M.Y., Abu Bakar, N.M. & Mahbob, M. H. (2012). The Dynamics of Student Participation in classroom: observation on level and forms of participation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 61 – 70. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.246.
Al-Sheeb B., Hamouda AM., and Abdella GM. (2018). Investigating determinants of student satisfaction in the first year of college in a public university in the state of qatar. Hindawi Education Research International, 1-14. https://doi. org/10.1155/2018/7194106.
Akrim, Akrim. (2018). Media learning in digital era. 5th international conference on community development (AMCA). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 231, 458-460. https://www.atlantis-press.com/ proceedings/amca18/25901808.
Asyhar, H.R. (2011). Kreatif mengembangkan media pembelajaran. Jakarta: Gaung Persada (GP) Press.
Bahmanbijar, B., Nazarieh M., Toufan N., Dehghani M., and Beigzadeh, A. (2019). Identification of the reasons behind students' lack of participation in classroom activities using a Delphi technique. Future Of Medical Education Journal, 9(2), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.22038/ FMEJ.2019. 15154.1091.
Bergmark, U., and Westma, S. (2018). Student participation within teacher education: emphasising democratic values, engagement and learning for a future profession. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1352–1365. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07294360. 2018.1484708.
Budiningsih, I., Soehari, T.D., and Hidayati, R.N. (2020). Technology training & creativity for strengthening employees innovative behaviors. GATR Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review, 8(3), 162 – 169. https://doi.org/ 10.35609/ gjbssr.2020.8.3(3).
Budininhsih, I., Oktapiani, M., Rijanto, W. (2024). Penugasan kreatif siswa Di Era Digital - Be More Creative. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Bowden J.L., Tickleb L, and Naumann K. (2021). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079. 2019.167264.
Butt, B., and Rehman, K. (2010). A Study examining student satisfaction in higher education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5446–5450. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.sbspro.2010. 03.888.
Center of Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). (2008). 21ST Century Learning: Research, Innovation and Policy Directions from Recent OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development Analysis). OECD/CERI International Conference. https://www.csuchico. edu/futurepossibilities/assets/documents/oecd-21st-century-learning-40554299.pdf.
Choe RC., et al. (2019). Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. Los Angeles: Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Office of Instructional Development, Molecular Biology Institute, University of California. https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31675279/.
Collaço, C.M. (2017). Increasing student engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(4), 40-47.https://www. proquest.com/docview/19494774 84?pqorigsite=primo&sourcetype=Scholarly%20 Journals.
Echiverri, L.L., Shang, H., and Xu, K. (2020). Class discussion and class participation: determination of their relationship. International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’20). Universitat Polit`ecnica de Valencia, Valencia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd20.2020. 11121.
Gustavoa GC., Margaritab R., Asuncionc H., Maria Josed A., and Maria Victoriaa T. (2017). Action research plan to boost participation in college students. 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’17), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia. http://dx. doi.org/10.4995/HEAd17.2017. 5582.
Gray J.A. and DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments”. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 1 - 20. https:// files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ11036 54.pdf.
Jamaris, M. (2015). New orientation in educational psychology. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Törmänen, T., Mänty, K., Haataja, E., Ahola, S., and Järvelä S. (2020). A collaborative learning design for promoting and analyzing adaptive motivation and emotion regulation in the science classroom. METHODS, 5, 1-16. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/feduc. 2020.00111.
Junaidi, A., et al. (2021). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk mendukung merdeka belajar-kampus merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S.M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 486 – 490. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro. 2011.12.091.
Maloy, R. W., Verock, R., Edwards, S.A., and Woolf, B.P. (2017). Transforming learning with new technologies. Massachusetts: Pearson Education.
Midun H., Bule O., & Rorimpandey W H F. (2020). The effect of scaffolding on assignment quality and procedural learning achievement. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal); 22 (December): 143-156. DOI: https:// dx.doi.org/10.7358/ ecps-2020-022-midu.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.