Email this article How Economics-Socio-Cultural Status affect Indonesian Students’ Performance in Mathematics? an Insight from PISA 2012-2022
Abstract
Abstract: How Economics-Socio-Cultural Status affect Indonesian Students’ Performance in Mathematics? an Insight from PISA 2012-2022. To date, the average mathematics performance of Indonesian students in PISA tends to be unchanged, and lower than that of OECD countries. However, PISA participants in Indonesia consist of students from five to six different grades. Objectives: This research aims to determine how Economic-Socio-Cultural Status (ESCS) and student grades influence Indonesian students' mathematics performance. Methods: We apply a quantitative approach using multiple linear regression analysis methods using the PISA 2012, 2015, 2018, and 2022 datasets. In this analysis, we also use the weight of each sample and the overall plausible value for mathematics performance. Findings: we found a significant relation between education level and ESCS regarding students' overall mathematics performance in PISA from 2012 to 2022. The interaction coefficient increases as the level increases from grade 8 of junior secondary school to grade 11. Conclusion: ESCS has a contribution to the diversity of students' mathematics performance at the same grade. From 2012 to 2022, the relative position of Indonesian students' ESCS compared to all participant has declined, although its influence on student mathematics performance tends to decline.
Keywords: PISA, mathematics, Indonesia.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i3.2024122
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Araujo, L., Saltelli, A., & Schnepf, S. V. (2017). Do PISA data justify PISA-based education policy?. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 19(1), 20-34. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-12-2016-0023
Avvisati, F. (2020). The measure of socio-economic status in PISA: A review and some suggested improvements. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00086-x
Bailey, P., Emad, A., Huo, H., Lee, M., Liao, Y., Lishinski, A., ... & Bailey, M. P. (2023). Package ‘EdSurvey’ version 4.0.1.
Baird, J. A., Johnson, S., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Isaacs, T., Sprague, T., Stobart, G., & Yu, G. (2016). On the supranational spell of PISA in policy. Educational Research, 58(2), 121-138. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1165410
Barrera-Osorio, F., García-Moreno, V., Patrinos, H., & Porta, E. (2011). Using the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition technique to analyze learning outcomes changes over time: an application to indonesia’s results in PISA Mathematics. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 11(3).
BPS. (2022). Statistik Pendidikan 2021. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Breakspear, S. (2012), “The policy impact of pisa: an exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28-en
Caro, D. H., & Biecek, P. (2017). intsvy: An R package for analyzing international large-scale assessment data. Journal of Statistical Software, 81, 1-44.
Çiftçi, Ş.K., Cin, F.M. (2017). The Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Students’ Achievement. In: Karadag, E. (eds) The Factors Effecting Student Achievement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56083-0_10
Efendi, R., & Kismiantini, K. (2022, December). Analysis of PISA 2018 results in Indonesia: Perspective of socioeconomic status and school resources. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2575, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108065
Efriani, A., & Putri, R. I. I. (2019). Sailing context in pisa-like mathematics problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.5245.265-276
Fuchs, T., & Wößmann, L. (2008). What accounts for international differences in student prformance? A re-examination using PISA data (pp. 209-240). Physica-Verlag HD.
Ganzeboom, H. (2010). How was new ISEI-08 constructed. Retrieved October 16, 2023 from http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/isco08/qa-isei-08.htm.
Gomes, M., Hirata, G., & e Oliveira, J. B. A. (2020). Student composition in the PISA assessments: Evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Educational Development, 79, 102299.
Hughes, J. N., Wu, J. Y., Kwok, O. M., Villarreal, V., & Johnson, A. Y. (2012). Indirect effects of child reports of teacher–student relationship on achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 350 https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ a0026339
Insani, F. D. (2019). Sejarah perkembangan kurikulum di Indonesia sejak awal kemerdekaan hingga saat ini. As-Salam: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan, 8(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.51226/ assalam.v8i1.132
Kartianom, K., & Ndayizeye, O. (2017). What‘s wrong with the Asian and African Students’ mathematics learning achievement? The multilevel PISA 2015 data analysis for Indonesia, Japan, and Algeria. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 200-210. http://dx.doi.org/10. 21831/jrpm.v4i2.16931
Kismiantini., Setiawan, E. P., Pierewan, A. C., & Montesinos-López, O. A. (2021). Growth mindset, school context, and mathematics achievement in Indonesia: A multilevel model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13690. 279-294
Liu, H., Liu, Q., Du, X., Liu, J., Hoi, C. K. W., & Schumacker, R. E. (2023). Teacher-student relationship as a protective factor for socioeconomic status, students’ self-efficacy and achievement: A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Current Psychology, 42(4), 3268–3283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01598-7
Marks, G. N., & O'Connell, M. (2021). Inadequacies in the SES–Achievement model: Evidence from PISA and other studies. Review of Education, 9(3), e3293. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3. 3293
Michael, D., & Kyriakides, L. (2023). Mediating effects of motivation and socioeconomic status on reading achievement: a secondary analysis of PISA 2018. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00181-9
Muflihah, L. W., & Kismiantini, K. (2023, March). Analysis of PISA 2018: How student engagement and teacher support affects mathematics achievement in Indonesia. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2556, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0111152
Murtiyasa, B., Rejeki, S., & Setyaningsih, R. (2018, June). PISA-like problems using Indonesian contexts. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1040, No. 1, p. 012032). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1040/1/012032
Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2020, October). Designing PISA-like mathematics problem in covid-19 pandemic (PISAComat). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1657, No. 1, p. 012057). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012057
OECD (2009), PISA data analysis manual: SPSS, 2nd Edition, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056275-en
OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
OECD (2003a), PISA 2022 Results Factsheet - Indonesia. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2023b), PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en.
Pakpahan, R. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi capaian literasi matematika siswa Indonesia dalam PISA 2012. Jurnal pendidikan dan kebudayaan, 1(3), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.24832/ jpnk.v1i3.496
Peters, M. L. (2013). Examining the relationships among classroom climate, self efficacy, and achievement in undergraduate mathematics: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9347-y
Pohan, Y. (2020). Pengaruh penggunaan internet terhadap minat dan hasil belajar matematis siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Matematika Sigma (Jpms), 6(2), 93-100.
Pokropek, A., Marks, G. N., Borgonovi, F., Koc, P., & Greiff, S. (2022). General or specific abilities? Evidence from 33 countries participating in the PISA assessments. Intelligence, 92, 101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101653
Prabawa, A. F., Indreswari, H. Setiyowati, A. J & Mahalle, S. (2024). How can we enhance pisa ranking through effective learning methods? systematic literature review from 2019 to 2024. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 14(2), 1421-1442. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i2.2024100
Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2017). Affective
teacher-student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239–261. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3
Sari, D. A. K., & Setiawan, E. P. (2023). Literasi baca siswa indonesia menurut jenis kelamin, growth mindset, dan jenjang pendidikan: survei PISA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8i1.3873
Sari, I. N., & Kismiantini, K. (2023, March). The school climate in mathematics achievement: Findings from PISA 2018 Indonesia. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2556, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0110260
Setiawan, E. P. (2021). Statistical literacy in primary school mathematics curricula: historical review and development. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk. v6i1.1915
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on mathematics education, 2(2), 95-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126
Suharti, S. (2013). Trends in education in Indonesia. In Education in Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS). https://doi.org/.1355/9789814459877-007
Sulis, I., Giambona, F., & Porcu, M. (2020). Adjusted indicators of quality and equity for monitoring the education systems over time. Insights on EU15 countries from PISA surveys. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 69, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.seps.2019.05.005
Sumarsih, I., Marliyani, T., Hadiyansah, Y., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Analisis implementasi kurikulum merdeka di sekolah penggerak sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 8248-8258. https://dx.doi.org/10.31004/basicedu. v6i5.3216
Suwarno, M. (2017). Potensi youtube sebagai sumber belajar matematika. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej. v1i1.1989
Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Butz, A. R., & Rojas, J. P. (2019). Perseverant grit and self efficacy: Are both essential for children’s academic success? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 877. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3
Watanabe, R. (2009). PISA data analysis manual: SPSS, 2nd edition. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Xie, C., & Ma, Y. (2019). The mediating role of cultural capital in the relationship between socioeconomic status and student achievement in 14 economies. British Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 838-855. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3528
Xu, Z. Z., & Qi, C. (2019). The relationship between teacher-student relationship and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(10), 1–7. https://doi.org/ 10.29333/ejmste/105610
Xuan, X., Xue, Y., Zhang, C., Luo, Y., Jiang, W., Qi, M., & Wang, Y. (2019). Relationship among school socioeconomic status, teacher-student relationship, and middle school students’ academic achievement in China: Using the multilevel mediation model. PLoS ONE, 14(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0213783
Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, H. H. (2019). Predicting mathematics achievement: The role of perceived feedback, teacher support and self-beliefs. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.435345
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.