Investigating the Horizontal Mathematization Process for Students with Diverse Adversity Quotients in Solving PISA-Oriented Problems

Whikan Ayu Hanifah, Triyanto Triyanto, laila fitriana

Abstract


Abstract: Investigating the Horizontal Mathematization Process for Students with Diverse Adversity Quotients in Solving PISA-Oriented Problems. Objectives: This study aims to understand the horizontal mathematization process of students with climber, camper, and quitter types of Adversity Quotient (AQ) in solving PISA-oriented problems. Methods: This research employs a qualitative approach. Data was collected using questionnaires, written tests, and unstructured interviews. The data was analyzed through data reduction, presentation, and verification or conclusion. Findings: The research results indicate that students of SMP Negeri 9 Surakarta in the 2023/2024 academic year with a climber AQ type have already developed the ability to solve PISA-oriented problems using the horizontal mathematization process well. Students with a camper AQ type have already developed the ability to solve PISA-oriented problems reasonably using the horizontal mathematization process. Meanwhile, students with a quitter AQ type have not yet developed the ability to solve PISA-oriented problems using the horizontal mathematization process. Conclusion: Based on this research, students with a climber AQ type have a better or higher mathematical process than those with a camper or quitter AQ type.

 

Keywords: adversity quotient, horizontal mathematization process, PISA.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i3.2024115


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aaung, P. E. E. & San, A.A. (2020). Adversity Quotient and Academic Stress of Students from Universities of Education. J Myanmar Acad. Arts Sci. 18(9B), 647-658.

Akbar, S., Putri, Y. K., & Rizdanti, S. (2023). Analysis of factors affecting students' adversity quotient on completing an undergraduate thesis. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 9(1), 124-133.

Amir, Z., Risnawati, Kurniati, A. M ., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Adversity Quotient in Mathematics Learning (Quantitative Study on Students Boarding School in Pekanbaru). International Journal of Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME). 1(2), 169-176.

Anju, J. & Sahoo, . (2023). Adversity quotient: a review of related literature. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology. 2(10), 26-32.

Asni, Nabilah, S.S., Fajri, N., & Chairunnisa, D. (2021). Adversity quotient of students during covid-19 outbreak. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia (JPPI). 7(1), 72-77.

Dewi, F.C., & Wutsqa, D.U. (2024). A Literature review regarding the position of adversity quotient in mathematics learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 11(8), 630-640.

Djunaidah, S., Matulesy, A., & Rini, R. A. P. (2023). Self-Esteem and Adversity Quotient to Increase Learning Independence. International Journal of Research in Counseling. 2(2), 1-14.

Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal, a mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 32(6), 777-796.

Hasibuan, S.A., Fauizi, K, M, A., & Mukhtar (2020). Development of PISA mathematical problem model on the content of change and relationship to measure students mathematical problem-solving ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 15(2), 1-9.

Hidayat, R., Hermandra, & Ying, S.T.D. (2023) The sub-dimensions of metacognition and their influence on modeling competency. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. 10(763), 1-12.

Juwita, H. R., Roemintoyo, & Usodo, B. (2020). The role of adversity quotient in education: A review of the literature on educational development. International Journal of Educational Methodology. 6(3), 507-515.

Kusmaryono, I., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2023). Evaluating the results of PISA assessment: are there gaps between the teaching of mathematical literacy at schools and in PISA assessment? European Journal of Educational Research. 12(3), 1479- 1493.

Mezmir, E.A. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: an overview of data reduction, data display and interpretation. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(21), 15-27.

Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mudaly, V. (2004). Modeling of real-world problems is often the starting point for proof. Pythagoras. 60, 36-43.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): the state of learning and equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Rokayah, C., Apriliani, S., Jayanti, T. N. & Puspitasari, S. (2023). Adversity quotient of nursing student. Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research. 5(4), 977-982.

Septiana, D. & Nurkhin, A. (2018). Sikap berwirausaha memediasi kecerdasan dalam menghadapi rintangan terhadap intensi berwirausaha. Economic Education Analysis Journal. 7(3), 801-815.

Septianingtyas, N. & Jusra, H. (2020). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik berdasarkan adversity quotient. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 4(2), 657-672.

Veola, P.L. & Faiziyah, N. (2023). Climber, camper, and quitter: how to solve ethnomathematics-based mathematics problem. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan. 14 (4). 6771-6781.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.