The Ethical Side of Economic Learning Integration: Empirical Study of Prospective Economic Teacher

Lina Rifda Naufalin, Cicilia Dyah Sulistyaningrum Indrawati, Mintasih Indriayu, Leny Noviani

Abstract


Abstract: The Ethical Side of Economic Learning Integration: Empirical Study of Prospective Economic Teacher. Objective: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge as a knowledge framework regarding the integration of technology and pedagogy in developing learning content in accordance with the demands of the 21st century is currently starting to touch on ethical aspects in its implementation. This research aims to describe TPACK and knowledge about digital ethics among prospective economics teacher students as a provision for implementing ethical TPACK after entering the world of work.. Method: Descriptive quantitative methodology was used using a Likert scale questionnaire. The dimensions studied include self-perception of professional ethical knowledge, technological ethical knowledge, pedagogical technological ethical knowledge, and economics disciplinary technological ethical knowledge. Prospective economics teacher students are the population in this study. The sample of 155 was determined using convenience sampling. Findings: The results of the research show that the dimensions of knowledge about professional ethics, knowledge of technology ethics, knowledge of pedagogical technology ethics, knowledge of scientific discipline technology ethics are in the very good and good categories. However, the ethical aspect of technology still needs to be improved. Conclusion: This research contributes to the preparation of the learning curriculum for prospective economics teacher students so that prospective economics teachers have the skills to apply TPACK by paying attention to ethics therein.

 

Keywords: digital ethics, TPACK, prospective teacher students.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i2.202489


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ağçam, R., Akbana, Y. E., & Rathert, S. (2020). Dealing with emergency remote teaching: the case of pre-service english language teachers in Turkey. Journal of Language and Education, 7(4), 16–29.

Akhwani, A., & Rahayu, D. (2021). Analysis of elementary teachers' TPACK components as a framework for professional teacher competencies in the 21st century. Jurnal Basicedu, 5, 1918–1925.

Alayyar, G. M., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service science teachers: Support from: Blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8), 1298–1316.

Allen, J. P., & Velden, R. K. W. Van der. (2012). Skills for the 21st century: Implications for education. cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Ata, R., & Yıldırım, K. (2019). Exploring turkish pre-service teachers’ perceptions and views of digital literacy. Education Sciences, 9(1).

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2023). No Title. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTE3OSMy/tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka-berdasarkan-tingkat-pendidikan.html

Bartenschlager, C. C., Gassner, U. M., Römmele, C., Brunner, J. O., Schlögl-Flierl, K., & Ziethmann, P. (2024). The AI ethics of digital COVID-19 diagnosis and their legal, medical, technological, and operational managerial implications. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 152, 102873.

Chai, C. S., Hwee Ling Koh, J., & Teo, Y. H. (2019). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360–384.

Davy Tsz Kit, N. G., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100054.

D’Hondt, C., De Winne, R., Ghysels, E., & Raymond, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence alter egos: who might benefit from robo-investing? Journal of Empirical Finance, 59, 278–299.

Dignum, V. (2021). The role and challenges of education for responsible ai. London Review of Education, 19(1), 1–11.

Doering, A., Koseoglu, S., Scharber, C., Henrickson, J., & Lanegran, D. (2014). Technology integration in k–12 geography education using tpack as a conceptual model. Journal of Geography, 113(6), 223–237.

Dunleavy, G., Nikolaou, C. K., Nifakos, S., Atun, R., Law, G. C. Y., & Car, L. T. (2019). Mobile digital education for health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. In Journal of Medical Internet Research (Vol. 21, Issue 2).

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472.

Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J. F., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. M. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41, 944–963.

Gómez-Trigueros, I. M. (2023). Digital skills and ethical knowledge of teachers with TPACK in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2).

Gómez-Trigueros, I. M., Ruiz-Bañuls, M., & Ortega-Sánchez, D. (2019). Digital literacy of teachers in training: Moving from icts (information and communication technologies) to lkts (learning and knowledge technologies). Education Sciences, 9(4).

Gutierrez Martin, A., Palacios Picos, A., & Torrego Egido, L. (2010). School teacher training and ICT integration in education: anatomy of a mismatch. Education Magazine, 353(353), 267–293.

Hamiti, M., Reka, B., & Baloghová, A. (2014). Ethical use of information technology in high education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4411–4415.

Handayani, S., Hussin, M., & Norman, H. (2024). Evaluating teaching readiness using the TPACK model: factor, reliability and validity analyses for Indonesian economics teacher candidates. Perspektive Nauki i Obrazovania, 68(2), 679–698.

Hilyana, F. S., Fakhriyah, F., & Masfuah, S. (2023). Analysis on the ability of primary teacher education lecturers in TPACK-based E-learning. International Conference on Applied Computational Intelligence and Analytics (ACIA-2022).

İpek, Z. H., Gözüm, A. İ. C., Papadakis, S., & Kallogiannakis, M. (2023). Educational applications of the chatgpt ai system: a systematic review research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3), 26–55.

Kazim, E., & Koshiyama, A. S. (2021). A high-level overview of AI ethics. Patterns, 2(9), 100314.

Maipita, I., Dongoran, F. R., Syah, D. H., & Sagala, G. H. (2023). TPACK, organizational support, and technostress in explaining teacher performance during fully online learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 22, 41–70.

McDonald, N., & Pan, S. (2020). Intersectional AI: A study of how information science students think about ethics and their impact. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2).

Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9).

Miguel-Revilla, D., Martínez-Ferreira, J. M., & Sánchez-Agustí, M. (2020). Assessing the digital competence of educators in social studies: An analysis in initial teacher training using the TPACK-21 model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 1–12.

Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Saudagar, F., Pratama, R., Wahyuni, S., Sadikin, A., & Indrayana, B. (2019). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Indonesian science teachers’ survey and perspective. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9, 269.

Park, S., & Kim, S. (2021). Is sustainable online learning possible with gamification? the effect of gamified online learning on student learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(8).

Reisoğlu, İ., & Çebi, A. (2020). How can the digital competences of pre-service teachers be developed? Examining a case study through the lens of DigComp and DigCompEdu. Computers and Education, 156.

Robinson, S. C. (2020). Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI). Technology in Society, 63, 101421.

Salifu, I., Arthur, F., Arkorful, V., Abam Nortey, S., & Solomon Osei-Yaw, R. (2024). Economics students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT in higher education: a hybrid structural equation modelling-artificial neural network approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1).

Sauvola, J., Tarkoma, S., Klemettinen, M., Riekki, J., & Doermann, D. (2024). Future of software development with generative AI. Automated Software Engineering, 31(1).

Semiz, K., & Ince, M. L. (2012). Pre-service physical education teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1248–1265.

Sugiono. (2018). Educational research methods quantitative, qualitative, and R&D Approaches. ALPHABET, Cv, 199.

Wells, M. S., Irish, C. K., Peck, K. A., Davis, J. S., & Clayton, C. (2023). Innovations in intern/mentor relationships and conceptions of the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. Teacher Educators’ Journal, 16(1), 1–26.

Zhao, Y., Sánchez Gómez, M. C., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Zhao, L. (2021). Digital competence in higher education: Students’ perception and personal factors. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.