Fostering Students’ Creative Attitudes in Laboratory Inquiry Activities: Learning about Extraction by Utilizing Dragon Fruit Skins

Sunyono Sunyono, Annnisa Meristin

Abstract


Abstract: Fostering Students’ Creative Attitudes in Laboratory Inquiry Activities: Learning about Extraction by Utilizing Dragon Fruit Skins. Objective: The current study aimed to determine the effect of the laboratory inquiry learning model on students’ creative attitudes. Methods: This research was conducted using a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design and data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistical analysis n-Gain and t-test. Data collection techniques were carried out by means of observation and questionnaires. Findings: The results showed that there was a significant influence on the development of creative attitudes, especially on indicators of mutual respect. Strategy used in this research was successful in increasing students’ activities in the classroom. Conclusion: Laboratory inquiry activities by utilizing dragon fruit skins can be used as a attractive learning strategy to improve students’ creative attitude in learning about extraction.


Keywords: laboratory inquiry, creative attitude, learning about extraction.



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i1.202432

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adeleke, A. A., & Joshua, E. O. (2015). Development and validation of scientific literacy achievement test to assess senior secondary school students’ literacy acquisition in physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(7), 28–43. https://files.eric.ed. gov/fulltext/EJ1083081.pdf.

Agustin, M. S., Sunyono, S., & Efkar, T. (2019). Pengaruh isu sosio-saintifik dalam meningkatkan sikap kreatif siswa pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non-elektrolit. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 8(2), 283-294.

Arikunto, S. (2008). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Baehaki F., Nahadi, dan Firman H. (2016). Pengembangan dan validasi tes pilihan ganda berbasis penalaran untuk mengukur penguasaan materi kesetimbangan kimia. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. https://repository.upi.edu/ 26421/.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010) How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Virginia USA: Alexandria.

Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-1959.

Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/261473819_Validity_and_Reliability_in_ Social_Science_Research.

Ernawati, M.D.W., Muhammad, D., Asrial, & Muhaimin. (2019). Identifying creative thinking skills in subject matter bio-chemistry. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(4), 581-589. https://doi.org/10.11591/ ijere.v8i4.20257.

Firman, H. (2000). “Penilaian hasil belajar dalam pengajaran kimia”, Bandung, PMIPA UPI.

Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 82–88.

Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy”, International Journal of Enviromental & Science Education, 4(3), 275-288. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ EJ884397.pdf.

Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Hariad, M. H., Warsono, W., & Wahyudi, A. (2021). The Impact of Collaborative Model Assisted by Google Classroom to Improve Students' Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 396-403.

Ketpichainarog, W, Panjipan, B, & Ruenwongsa (2010). Enchanced learning of biotechnology students by an inquiry-based cellulase laboratory. International Journal of Enviromental and Science Education, 5(2), 169-187. http://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ884417.pdf.

Lam, M. C., Tee, H. K., Nizam, S. S. M., Hashim, N. C., Suwadi, N. A., Tan, S. Y., ... & Liew, S. Y. (2020). Interactive augmented reality with natural action for chemistry experiment learning. Tem Journal, 9(1).

Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Liliasari (2007). Scientific concepts and generic science skills relationship in the 21st century science education. The First International Seminar of Science Education.

Manalu, L.F., Asmadi, M.N., & Rasmiwetti. (2012). Penerapan model pembelajaran tipe stad untuk meningkatkan sikap kreatif siswa pada pokok bahasan termokimia di kelas xi ipa sman 3 pekanbaru. Riau: Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Riau.

Ministry of Education and Culture (2013). Kurikulum 2013 (Kompetensi Dasar SMK/MK). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Munandar, S.C.U. (2012). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Mustofa, R. F., & Hidayah, Y. R. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning on lateral thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 463-474. https://doi.org/10.29333/ iji.2020.13130a

Nagl, M., Gledic, N., & Djokic-Djovanovic, J. (2013). Experiment is the Central Part of the Topic and Realized by IBSE Method. TEM Journal, 2(2), 204-206.

Nentwig, P. M., Demuth, R., Parchmann, I., Ralle, B., & Gräsel, C. (2007). Chemie im Kontext: Situating learning in relevant contexts while systematically developing basic chemical concepts”, Journal of Chemical Education, 84(9), 1439. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p1439.

Palupi, B., Subiyantoro, S., Triyanto, T., & Rukayah, R. (2020). Creative-thinking skills in explanatory writing skills viewed from learning behaviour: A mixed method case study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(1), 200-212.

Putriana, P., Sunyono, S., & Diawati, C. (2018). Pengaruh penggunaan isu sosiosaintifik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan metakognisi siswa pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non-elektrolit. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 7(2), 1-12.

Qing, Z., Jing, G., & Yan, W. (2010). Promoting preservice teachers’ critical thinking skills by inquiry-based chemical experiment, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4597-4603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.737.

Regulation of the Minister of National Education Number 34 of 2018 concerning National Standards for Vocational Secondary School / Madrasah Aliyah Vocational Education.

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/20342603.

Ruzaman, N. (2020). Inquiry-based education: Innovation in participatory inquiry paradigm. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(10), 4-15. .

Salam, M., Ibrahim, N., & Sukardjo, M. (2019). Effects of instructional models and spatial intelligence on the mathematics learning outcomes after controlling for students’ initial competency. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 699-716. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12342a.

Sari, N.I. (2014). Laporan Studi Pendahuluan. Bandung: Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Sari, S., Ratnasari, R., & Farida, I. (2016). Pengembangan sikap kreatif siswa pada praktikum penjernihan air. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan), 1(2), 124-136.

Sengkhamparn, N., Chanshotikul, N., Assawajitpukdee, C., & Khamjae, T. (2013). Effects of blanching and drying on fiber rich powder from pitaya (Hylocereus undatus) peel. International Food Research Journal, 20(4),1595-1600. http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/20%20(04)%202013/12%20IFRJ%2020%20(04)%202013% 20Nopaporn%20(484).pdf.

Senocak, E., Samarapungavan, A., Aksoy, P., & Tosun, C. (2013). A Study on development of an instrument to determine turkish kindergarten students' understandings of scientific concepts and scientific inquiry processes. Educational sciences: theory and practice, 13(4), 2217-2228.

Smith, K. C. & Nakhleh, M. B. (2011). University students’ conceptions of bonding in melting and dissolving phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4, 398–408. https://doi.org/ 10.1039/C1RP90048J.

Sugiarti, R., & Sunyono, S. (2021). Chemistry learning through practicum with household materials during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 11(1), 129-138.

Sund & Trowbridge. (1973). Teaching Science by Inquiry in The Secondary School, Ohio, Charles E. Merril Publishing Co.

Sunyono & Efkar, T. (2020). Desain pembelajaran kimia sma berbasis sosiosaintifik dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi kimia dan efikasi diri siswa. Laporan Penelitian Skim Terapan BLU Unila 2020. LPPM Universitas Lampung.

Sunyono, S., & Meristin, A. (2018). The effect of multiple representation-based learning (mrl) to increase students’understanding of chemical bonding concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.15294/ jpii.v7i4.16219.

Stenberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98.

Stojanova, B. (2010). Development of creativity as a basic task of the modern educational system. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci, 2, 3395-400. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.522.

Thoha, M. C. (1994). Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Toth, E.E, Ludvico, L.R, & Morrow, B.L. (2012). Blended inquiry with hands-on and virtual laboratories: the role of perceptual features during knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environment Journal, 22(5), 614-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012. 693102.

Trnova, E. (2014) IBSE and Creativity Development. Science Education International, 25, 8-18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1022897.pdf.

Verawati, N.N.S.P. and Hikmawati (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry learning models intervened by reflective processes to promote critical thinking ability in terms of cognitive style. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(16), 212–220. https://www.onlinejournals.org/ index.php/i-jet/article/view/11487/6337.

Valentová, M. and Brečka, P. (2020). Ways of critical and creative thinking development in practical training through video-study. TEM Journal, 9(1), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.18421/ TEM91‐45.

Wall, K.P., Dillon, R., & Knowles, M.K. (2015). Fluorescence quantum yield measurments of fluorescent proteins: a laboratory experiment for biochemistry or molecular biophysics laboratory course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education Journal, 43(1), 52-59. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/bmb.20837.

Wiersma, W. & Jurs, G.S. (2009). Research methods in education : an introduction. Boston: Pearsin.

Wenning, C. J. (2005). Levels of inquiry: hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry process. Journal of Physics Teacher Education, 2(3), 3-11. http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/publications/levels_of_inquiry.pdf.

Wilson, F., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F074817561244 0286.

Winarno (1992). Kimia Pangan dan Gizi. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Wiranata, R. R. S. (2019). Tantangan, prospek dan peran pesantren dalam pendidikan karakter di era revolusi industri 4.0. Journal Al-Manar, 8(1), 61-92. https://doi.org/10.36668/jal.v8i1.99.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.