Email this article LMS Affects Teaching Effectiveness: Depending on LMS Platforms, Lecturer Qualification, and Lecturer Age
Abstract
Abstract: LMS Affects Teaching Effectiveness: Depending on LMS Platforms, Lecturer Qualification, and Lecturer Age. The ability of lecturers to manage the LMS affects the effectiveness of their teaching. Each LMS platform has differences in the user interface and the available features. Educational qualifications and the age of lecturers affect the mastery of LMS applications. So, the type of LMS platform, educational qualifications, and age of the lecturers affect teaching effectiveness. Objective: This study aims to examine the effects and comparisons between the three groups. Methods: The comparison of the LMS platform group consists of Moodle and Google Classroom, the educational qualification group consists of masters and doctoral degrees, and the age group is d 45 years and more than 45 years. Findings: The analysis results with the three-way ANOVA found that the three groups had an interaction effect of 74 percent on the effectiveness of their teaching. Conclusion: LMS Moodle, doctoral educational qualifications, and younger lecturers (d 45 years) have a higher average of lecturer teaching effectiveness.
Keywords: LMS, learning management system, lecturer qualification, lecturer age, teaching effectiveness.
Abstrak: LMS Mempengaruhi Keefektifan Mengajar: Bergantung pada Platform, Kualifikasi Pendidikan, dan Usia Dosen. Kemampuan dosen dalam mengelola LMS berpengaruh terhadap keefektifan pengajarannya. Tiap platform LMS memiliki perbedaan baik dari user interfacenya maupun pada fitur yang tersedia. Kualifikasi pendidikan dan usia dosen mempengaruhi penguasaan aplikasi LMS. Jadi, baik itu jenis platform LMS, kualifikasi pendidikan, dan usia dosen adalah berpengaruh terhadap keefektifan pengajaran. Tujuan: Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaruh dan perbandingan di antara ketiga kelompok itu. Metode: Komparasi Kelompok platfom LMS terdiri dari Moodle dan Google Classroom, kelompok kualifikasi pendidikan terdiri dari magister dan doktor, dan kelompok usia terdiri dari d 45 tahun dan lebih dari 45 tahun. Temuan: Hasil analisis dengan Anova Tiga Jalan ditemukan bahwa ketiga kelompok secara bersama memiliki pengaruh interaksi sebesar 74,1 persen terhadap keefektifan pengajarannya. Kesimpulan: dari hasil penelitian ini adalah LMS Moodle, kualifikasi pendidikan doktor, dan dosen yang lebih muda (d 45 tahun) memiliki rata-rata yang lebih tinggi terhadap keefektifan pengajaran dosen.
Kata kunci: LMS, sistem manajemen pembelajaran, kualifikasi pendidikan, usia dosen,keefektifan pengajaran.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abidin, Z., Hudaya, A., & Anjani, D. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Research and Development Journal of Education, 1(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v1i1.7659
Akbari, R., & Dadvand, B. (2011). Does Formal Teacher Education Make a Difference? A Comparison of Pedagogical Thought Units of B.A. Versus M.A. Teachers. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01142.x
Aldiab, A., Chowdhury, H., Kootsookos, A., Alam, F., & Allhibi, H. (2019). Utilization of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education system: A case review for Saudi Arabia. Energy Procedia, 160, 731–737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.186
Asamoah, M. K. (2020). ICT officials’ opinion on deploying Open Source Learning Management System for teaching and learning in universities in a developing society. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020946280
Azhar, K. A., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers Perceptions. PRIZREN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2(2 SE-Original Research Articles), 52–66. https://prizrenjournal.com/index.php/PSSJ/article/view/39
Böckelmann, C., Probst, C., Wassmer, C., & Baumann, S. (2021). Lecturers’ qualifications and activities as indicators of convergence and differentiation in the Swiss higher education system. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1923547
Carpenter, S. K., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2020). On Students’ (Mis)judgments of Learning and Teaching Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.009
Cuesta Medina, L. (2018). Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3100
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(0 SE-), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Dimić, G., Predić, B., Rančić, D., Petrović, V., Maček, N., & Spalević, P. (2018). Association analysis of moodle e-tests in blended learning educational environment. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(3), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21894
Dobre, I. (2015). Learning Management Systems for higher education - an overview of available options for Higher Education Organizations. In E. Soare & C. Langa (Eds.), The 6th International Conference Edu World 2014 “Education Facing Contemporary World Issues”, 7th - 9th November 2014 (Vol. 180, Issue November 2014, pp. 313–320). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.122
Ghosh, A., Nafalski, A., Nedic, Z., & Wibawa, A. P. (2019). Learning management systems with emphasis on the Moodle at UniSA. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 3(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v3i1.160
Holmes, K., & Prieto-Rodriguez, E. (2018). Student and staff perceptions of a learning management system for blended learning in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.2
Horvat, A., Dobrota, M., Krsmanovic, M., & Cudanov, M. (2015). Student perception of Moodle learning management system: a satisfaction and significance analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.788033
Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google Classroom: What Works and How? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12–18. https://www.jesoc.com/issue/volume-3-february-2016/
Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644
Kerimbayev, N, Kultan, J., Abdykarimova, S., & Akramova, A. (2017). LMS Moodle: Distance international education in cooperation of higher education institutions of different countries. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2125–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9534-5
Kerimbayev, Nurassyl, Nurym, N., Akramova, А., & Abdykarimova, S. (2020). Virtual educational environment: interactive communication using LMS Moodle. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1965–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10067-5
Ketut Sudarsana, I., Bagus Made Anggara Putra, I., Nyoman Temon Astawa, I., & Wayan Lali Yogantara, I. (2019). The use of Google classroom in the learning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175, 12165. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165
Kubiatko, M. (2013). The Comparison of Different Age Groups on the Attitudes toward and the Use of ICT. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice (Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri), 13(2), 1263–1272. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1017271
Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552
Mctighe, J., & O’connor, K. (2005). Seven Practices for Effective Learning Teachers in all content areas can use these seven assessment and grading practices to enhance learning and teaching. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 10–17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ745451
Munir, M. (2010). PENGGUNAAN LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) DI PERGURUAN TINGGI: STUDI KASUS DI UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.222
Oktavian, R., & Aldya, R. F. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring Terintegrasi di Era Pendidikan 4.0. Didaktis: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 20(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.30651/didaktis.v20i2.4763
Polla, G. (2010). Peranan Teknologi Informasi dalam Pengembangan E-Learning pada Fakultas Mipa di Indonesia. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 1(2), 1025. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v1i2.2659
Rahardja, U., Lutfiani, N., Rafika, A. S., & Harahap, E. P. (2020). Determinants of Lecturer Performance to Enhance Accreditation in Higher Education. 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268871
Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. C. (2018). A framework for digital media literacies for teaching and learning in higher education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018784952
Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., Muñoz-Rujas, N., Rodríguez-Arribas, S., Escolar-Llamazares, M. C., Alonso-Santander, N., Martínez-Martín, M. Á., & Mercado-Val, E. I. (2021). Teaching and learning styles on moodle: An analysis of the effectiveness of using stem and non-stem qualifications from a gender perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031166
Saraswat, S. (2014). Customization and Implementation of LMS Moodle. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(5), 1–4. http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0514.php?rp=P292672
Setyosari, P. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan & pengembangan. Prenadamedia Group.
Suartama, I. K., Setyosari, P., Sulthoni, S., & Ulfa, S. (2019). Development of an Instructional Design Model for Mobile Blended Learning in Higher Education. IJET: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(16), 4–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i16.10633
Sudiana, R. (2016). Efektifitas Penggunaan Learning Management System Berbasis Online. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 9(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v9i2.998
Torff, B., & Kimmons, K. (2021). Learning to Be a Responsive, Authoritative Teacher: Effects of Experience and Age on Teachers’ Interactional Styles. Educational Forum, 85(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2019.1698685
Vik, P. (2014). Regression, ANOVA, and the general linear model: A statistics primer. SAGE Publications.
Willermark, S., & Islind, A. S. (2022). Seven educational affordances of virtual classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100078
Yana, D., & Adam, A. (2019). Efektivitas Penggunaan Platform Lms Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Dimensi, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v8i1.1816
Zabolotniaia, M., Cheng, Z., Dorozhkin, E. M., & Lyzhin, A. I. (2020). Use of the LMS Moodle for an effective implementation of an innovative policy in higher educational institutions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(13), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14945
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.