Email this article Contribution of Integrated Learning through STEM Education in ASEAN Countries
Abstract
Abstract: Contribution of Integrated Learning through STEM Education in ASEAN Countries. Objectives: This article reviews and criticizes research reports on STEM education in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations or ASEAN countries. Methods: The study conducted through ACI database as an investigation source, a total of 24 articles were reviewed between the years 2013 and 2019. Data were analyzed by the main key of pedagogical practices, also is focused on the implementations of STEM education in an effective classroom. Findings: Findings showed that STEM education used in a variety of integrated pedagogical practices by different concepts and contexts.The process of STEM learning emphasizes on engineering process than the science process. It is generally drawn by 5D in a thematic approach: define, design, develop, debrief, and disseminate. Conclusions: Technology and design-based learning are calling for future research and the contribution of pedagogical practices in a diverse classroom.
Keywords: pedagogy, ASEAN, integrated learning, STEM education, pedagogical practices.
Abstrak: Kontribusi Pembelajaran Terpadu melalui Pendidikan STEM di Negara-negara ASEAN. Tujuan: Artikel ini mengkaji dan mengkritik laporan penelitian tentang pendidikan STEM di negara-negara ASEAN. Metode: Penelitian dilakukan melalui database ACI sebagai sumber investigasi dengan total 24 artikel yang dikaji berkisar antara tahun 2013 dan 2019. Data dianalisis melalui pedoman utama praktik-praktik pedagogis, juga difokuskan pada implementasi pendidikan STEM didalam kelas. Temuan: Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pendidikan STEM digunakan dalam berbagai praktik pedagogis terintegrasi dengan konsep dan konteks yang berbeda. Proses pembelajaran STEM menekankan pada proses rekayasa daripada proses sains. Secara umum digambarkan dengan 5D dalam pendekatan tematis yaitu: mendefinisikan, merancang, mengembangkan, menanya, dan menyebarluaskan. Pembelajaran berbasis desain dan teknologi menyerukan penelitian di masa yang akan datang dan kontribusi praktik pedagogis di ruang kelas yang beragam.
Kata kunci: pedagogi, ASEAN, pembelajaran terintegrasi, pendidikan STEM, praktik pedagogis.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdurrahman, A., Nurulsari, N., Maulina, H.,&Ariyani, F. (2019a). Design and validation of inquiry-based STEM learning strategy as a powerful alternative solution to facilitate gift students facing 21st century challenging. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 33-56.
Abdurrahman, A., Nurulsari, N., Maulina, H., Rahman, B., Umam, R., &Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019b). Multi-level Scaffolding: A Novel Approach of Physics Teacher Development Program for Promoting Content Knowledge Mastery. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 7(8), 71-89.
Akerson, V. L., Burgess, A., Gerber, A., Guo, M., Khan, T. A.,& Newman, S. (2018). Disentangling the meaning of STEM: Implications for science education and science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 1-8.
Andriani, R. D., Sunyono, S., & Abdurrahman, A. (2018). Enhancing Students’ Activity and Science Concept Mastery using Guided Inquiry-Based Practical Manual. JurnalPendidikanProgresif, 8(1), 1-9.
Bell, D., Morrison-Love, D., Wooff, D.,& McLain, M. (2018). STEM education in the twenty-first century: learning at work- an exploration of design and technology teacher perceptions and practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 721-737.
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C. & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
Capraro, R. M., Barroso, L. R., Nite, S., Rice, D., Lincoln, Y., Young, J.,& Young, J. (2018). Developing a useful and integrative STEM disciplinary language. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(1), 1-11.
Chai, C. S. (2019). Teacher professional development for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A review from the perspectives of technological pedagogical content (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 5-13.
DeJarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84.
Erduran, A.,&Ince, B. (2018).Identifying mathematics teachers' difficulties in technology integration in terms of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 555-576.
Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2019). Teaching Engineering-Focused STEM Curriculum: PCK Needed for Teachers. In Asia-Pacific STEM Teaching Practices (pp. 103-116).Springer, Singapore.
Furtak, E. M., &Penuel, W. R. (2019).Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands‐on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science Education, 103(1), 167-186.
Kelley, T. R. & Knowles, J. G. (2016).A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.
Koehler, M.,& Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Benjamin, W.,& Hong, H. Y. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and design thinking: A framework to support ICT lesson design for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 535-543.
Lai, C. S. (2018). Using inquiry-based strategies for enhancing students' STEM education learning. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 110-117.
Lee, M., Chai, C. S.,& Hong, H. (2019). STEM education in Asia Pacific: Challenges and development. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1),1-4.
Lee, S. W., Min, S.,&Mamerow, G. P. (2015). Pygmalion in the classroom and the home: Expectations’ role in the pipeline to STEMM. Teachers College Record, 117(9), 1-40.
Lin, Y. T., Wang, M. T.,& Wu, C. C. (2019). Design and implementation of interdisciplinary STEM instruction: Teaching programming by computational physics. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 77-91.
Lou, S.J., Chou, Y.C., Shih, R.C.,& Chung, C.C. (2017).A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387-2404.
McDonald, C. V. (2016). STEM education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530-569.
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
National Research Council. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing?. Virginia: National Academies Press.
Nitalinda, D., Abdurrahman, A., Hariri, H., Sowiyah, S., Karwan, D. H., &Rahman, B. (2019). The Novel Work Environment Model to Improve Teacher Performance: A Study at SMAN 1 Sungkai Jaya, North Lampung. JurnalPendidikanProgresif (JPP), 9(2), 54-62.
Nuangchalerm, P. (2018). Investigating views of STEM primary teachers on STEM education.Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 208-217.
Nuangchalerm, P., &ElIslami, R. A. Z. (2018).Comparative study between Indonesian and Thai novice science teacher students in content of science. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(2), 23-29.
Pitiporntapin, S., Chantara, P., Srikoom, W., Nuangchalerm, P.,& Hines, L. (2018).Enhancing Thai in-service teachers’ perceptions of STEM education with tablet-based professional development.Asian Social Science, 14(10), 13-20.
Prachagool, V.,&Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). Investigating the nature of science: An empirical report on the teacher development program in Thailand.JurnalPendidikan IPA Indonesia. 8(1): 32-38.
Prachagool, V., Nuangchalerm, P., Subramaniam, G.,& Dostál, J. (2016).Pedagogical decision making through the lens of teacher preparation program. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 41-52.
Saggi, K. (2018). Addressing the STEM problem in ways that work. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 339-341.
Sombatsompop, N., Premkamolnetr, N., Markpin, T., Ittiritmeechai, S., Wongkaew, C., Yochai, W., Ratchatahirun, P.,&Beng, L. I. (2011). Viewpoints on synergising ASEAN academic visibilities through research collaboration and the establishment of an ASEAN citation index database 1. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 52(2), 207-218.
Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019).Developing student 21 st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 39.
Walan, S. (2019).The dream performance–a case study of young girls’ development of interest in STEM and 21st century skills, when activities in a makerspace were combined with drama. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-21.
Widayanti, Abdurrahman, &Suyatna, A. (2019). Future physics learning materials based on STEM education: Analysis of teachers and students perceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1155, 1-9.
Wilson, H. E. (2018). Integrating the arts and STEM for gifted learners. Roeper Review, 40(2), 108-120.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.