Email this article Improving chemistry learning outcomes for vocational students using ARIAS learning model
Abstract
Abstract: Improving chemistry learning outcomes for vocational students using ARIAS learning model. Objectives: This classroom action research was carried out to investigate students’ chemistry learning outcomes at vocational level through ARIAS learning model. Methods: The study was conducted in two cycles, each cycle consisting of two meetings. Findings: The mean score before the treatment (T0) was 66.89 with learning mastery percentage of 40.54%, then the mean score increased to 76.51 after teacher applied ARIAS learning model in cycle I (T1) with learning mastery percentage of 62.16%. The improvement of the mean score of students’ cognitive learning outcomes also occurred in the last cycle. The mean score of student cognitive test result was 84.09 with learning mastery percentage of 89.19%. Students also gave positive responses of learning process. Conclusion: It indicated that the ARIAS learning model was proven to be able to effectively improve student learning outcomes, especially in Chemistry subjects at the vocational level.
Keywords: Classroom action research, ARIAS learning model, chemistry learning outcomes.
Abstrak: Meningkatkan hasil belajar kimia siswa kejuruan melalui model pembelajaran ARIAS. Tujuan: Tujuan: Menginvestigasi hasil belajar peserta didik pada bidang kejuruan dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran ARIAS. Metode: Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan dua siklus, masing-masing siklus terdiri dari 2 pertemuan. Temuan: Rata-rata hasil belajar sebelum diberikan perlakukan (T0) adalah sebesar 66,89 dengan persentase ketuntasan belajar sebesar 40,54%, kemudian rata-rata skor hasil belajar meningkat menjadi 76,51 setelah guru menerapkan model pembelajaran ARIAS pada siklus pertama. Peningkatan rata-rata skor hasil belajar kognitif siswa juga terjadi pada siklus terakhir. Skor rata-rata hasil tes kognitif siswa adalah 84.09 dengan persentase ketuntasan belajar sebesar 89,19%. Siswa juga memberikan respon positif terhadap proses pembelajaran. Kesimpulan: Model pembelajaran ARIAS terbukti dapat secara efektif meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa, terutama dalam mata pelajaran Kimia di tingkat kejuruan.
Kata kunci: Penelitian tindakan kelas, model pembelajaran ARIAS, hasil belajar kimia.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aidinopoulou, V., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). An action research study from implementing the flipped classroom model in primary school history teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 237.
Anggraeni, A. D. (2018). Metode Role Playing dalam Pembelajaran Profesi Kependidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 8(1), 29-35.
Arsyad, N., Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). Developing a self-learning model based on open-ended questions to increase the students’ creativity in calculus. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 9(2), 143-147.
Baº, G., & Beyhab, Ö. (2017). Effects of multiple intelligences supported project-based learning on students €@
m achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 365-386.
Bass, B. (2018). Action Research Study of Classical Teaching Methods vs. Active Learning Methods in the Middle School Social Studies Classroom. Culminating Experience Action Research Projects, Volume 18, Part 2, Spring 2016, 26.
Cochran-Smith, M., and S. l. lytle. (1990). “Research on Teaching and Teacher Research: The Issues That Divide.” Educational Researcher 19 (2): 2–11.
Cochran-Smith, M., and S. l. lytle. (1999). “The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade later.” Educational Researcher28 (7): 15–25.
Curºeu, P. L., Chappin, M. M., & Jansen, R. J. (2018). Gender diversity and motivation in collaborative learning groups: the mediating role of group discussion quality. Social Psychology of Education, 21(2), 289-302.
Daryanto.2011. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Penelitian Tindakan Sekolah Beserta Contoh-Contohnya. Yogyakarta: Gava Media
Gordy, X. Z., Jones, E. M., & Bailey, J. H. (2018). Technological Innovation or Educational Evolution? A Multi-disciplinary Qualitative Inquiry into Active Learning Classrooms. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 1-23.
Gribbins, M., & Cook, V. (2017, May). Workshop: Emerging Technologies and Practices that Promote Student-Centered Learning. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Midwest Association for Information Systems Conference (MWAIS), Springfield, Illinois.
Husna. (2012). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran ARIAS disertai Tugas AwalTerhadap Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 8 Padang. Jurnal Pelangi 3(2) : 1-14.
Jen, A. (2017). Improving Eight Graders’integrated Students Reading-Speaking Skill Based On The 2013 Curriculum.(A Classroom Action Research Conducted at Second Grade of SMP N 1 Sedayu) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta).
Kunandar.2013. Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Sebagai Pengembangan Profesi Guru.Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Kurniawati, E., Hartanto, H., & Zamzaili, Z. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assesment, Satisfaction (Arias) Integratif dan Kemampuan awal Dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kepahiang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 2(2).
Kusumah,Wijaya dan Dedi Dwitagama. 2012. Mengenal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT.Indeks.
Le Ha, P. (2014). The politics of naming: Critiquing “learner-centred” and “teacher as facilitator” in English language and humanities classrooms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 392-405.
Mettetal, G. (2001). “The What, Why and How of Classroom Action Research.” Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2 (1): 6–13.
Nissim, N., Shahar, Y., Elovici, Y., Hripcsak, G., & Moskovitch, R. (2017). Inter-labeler and intra-labeler variability of condition severity classification models using active and passive learning methods. Artificial intelligence in medicine, 81, 12-32.
Nurhayati.(2014). Pengaruh Strategi Genius Learning Melalui Model Pembelajaran ARIAS (Assurance, relevance, Interest, Assesmen, and Satisfaction) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan 3(1) : 72-78.
Pangujuanto, Teguh., Trirahmidi.(2009). KIMIA 3 Untuk kelas XII SMA/MA. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan
Permendikbud.2013. Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurukulum 2013. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan.
Rayens, W., & Ellis, A. (2018). Creating a Student-Centered Learning Environment Online. Journal of Statistics Education, 26(2), 92-102.
Saminan, S., Risa, N., & Hamid, T. (2017). Implementation of ARIAS Learning Model Integrated With Constructivist Theory to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 5(2), 213-224.
Smith, K. (2017). The Facilitator Perspective: The Decisions and Actions That Strategise Teacher Self-Directed Learning. In Teachers as Self-directed Learners (pp. 119-126). Springer, Singapore.
Sobocinski, M., Malmberg, J., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Exploring temporal sequences of regulatory phases and associated interactions in low-and high-challenge collaborative learning sessions. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 275-294.
Streveler, R. A., & Menekse, M. (2017). Taking a closer look at active learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 186-190.
Strijbos, J. W., & Wichmann, A. (2018). Promoting learning by leveraging the collaborative nature of formative peer assessment with instructional scaffolds. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 1-9.
Sulimah, S., Sulitya, D., & Fitri, S. (2018). Improving Students’ Learning Achievement Through Think, Talk, and Write (TTW) Learning Mode. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 8(1), 10-17.
Suparlan. 2004. Guru Efektif. Yogyakarta: Hikayat Publishing.
Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., & Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 7.
Wolters, C. A., Won, S., & Hussain, M. (2017). Examining the relations of time management and procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 12(3), 381-399.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.