Studi Investigasi Hubungan Antara Metakognisi, Self-regulasi dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa

Diah Utaminingsih

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships among metacognition, self-regulation, and learning motivation. The sample of study consists of 130 secondary education students who were enrolled in different programs at Bandar Lampung, in Lampung. In this study, Metacognitive Learning Inventory-Science Scale adapted from An & Co (2014) was used. The relationships among metacognition (a), self-regulation (b), and learning motivation (c) were examined using correlation analysis and the hypothesis model was examined using multiple regression analysis. In correlation analysis, metacognition, and self-regulation were found positively (respectively r (a-b)=0,430; r(a-c)=0,584;r(b-c)=0,497;p<0,01). According to results metacognition was predicted positively by self-regulation and learning motivation (respectively R2(a-b)=18,5%; R2(a-c)=34,1%; R2(a-c)=34,1%; R2(b-c)=24,1%)

Studi investigasi hubungan antara metakognisi, self-regulasi dan motivasi belajar siswa. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan antara metakognisi, self-regulasi, dan motivasi belajar siswa. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 130 siswa pendidikan menengah yang terdaftar dalam program yang berbeda di Bandar Lampung, Lampung. Dalam studi ini, Skala Metacognitive Learning Inventory-Science diadaptasi dari An & Co (2014). Hubungan antara metakognisi (a), self-regulation (b), dan motivasi belajar (c) diuji menggunakan analisis korelasi dan hipotesis diuji menggunakan analisis regresi berganda. Dalam analisis korelasi, metakognisi, dan self-regulasi berkorelasi secara positif (masing-masing r(a-b)=0.430; r(a-c)=0,584; r(b-c)=0,497; p<0,01). Melalui analisis hasil metakognisi, dapat diprediksi secara positif melalui self-regulasi dan motivasi belajar (masing-masing R2(a-b)=18,5%; R29a-c)=34,1%; R2(b-c)=24,1%).

Kata kunci: metakognisi, self-regulation, motivasi belajar

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v7.i1.201702


Full Text:

PDF

References


An, Y.J. and Cao, L., 2014. Examining the effects of metacognitive scaffolding on students design problem solving and metacognitive skills in an online environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(4), p.552.

Amsterlaw, J., 2006. Childrens beliefs about everyday reasoning. Child Development, 77(2), pp.443-464.

Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metaleaming in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185-212.

Biggs, John B. ( 1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Como, L., Collins, K., & Capper, J. (1982, March). Where theres a way theres a will: self-regulating the low-achieving student. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

Kurtz, B. E., & Borkowski, F. G. 1984. Childrens metacognition: Exploring relations among knowledge, process, and motivational variables. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37,335-54.

Landine, Jeffrey, and John Stewart. Relationship between Metacognition, Motivation, Locus of Control, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement. Canadian Journal of Counselling 32.3 (1998): 200-12.

Lindner, R., & Harris, B. 1992. The development and evaluation of a self- regulated learning inventory and its implications for instructor-independent instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. eds., 1998. Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. Guilford Press.

Stipek, Deborah. 1982, July. Motivating students to learn: A lifelong perspective. Paper presented at the Symposium, The students role in learning, of the National Commission on Excellence in Education, San Diego, CA.

Uguroglu, M. E., & Walberg, H.J. 1986. Predicting achievement and motivation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19, 1-12.

Watkins, D., & Hattie,J. 1992. The motive- strategy congruence model revisited. Con temporary, Education al Psychology, 17, 194-198

Veenman, M. and Elshout, J.J., 1999. Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European journal of psychology of education, 14(4), pp.509-523.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif




View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.