Mobile Connectivity: Ubiquitous Learning with Web-Based Module to Promote Scientific Argumentation Skills in Science Learning
Abstract
Abstract: Argumentation skills are still a challenge in science learning. Teachers must develop innovative learning to promote various thinking skills, one of which is argumentation skills. This research aims to develop valid, practical, and effective modules based on the web. The type of research applied was educational development research (EDR) with the ADDIE development model. The data collection techniques and instruments include validation sheets, practicality sheets, tests, observations, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. The research sample was class VIII-B SMPN 1 Sukowono, with 26 students. The data analysis results of the validity of the modules based on the web got an average score of 85% with highly valid criteria. The results of the learning implementation analysis got an average score of 85%, which is an outstanding category from the assessment of the three observers. Product effectiveness is obtained from test results and student response questionnaire sheets. The results of the product effectiveness analysis using the N-Gain test got an average score of 0.74 in the high criteria. Students can learn in various places and situations by accessing modules and collaborating with other students and other learning resources available on the network. Thus, the web-based module is feasible for improving argumentation skills.
Keywords: ubiquitous learning, web-based module, argumentation skills, science learning.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i1.pp386-398
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran (A. Holid (ed.). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Apsari, D. Y. (2014). Pengembangan lembar kegiatan siswa berorientasi sets pada materi pokok zat aditif makanan. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 3(2).
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer.
Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49, 1–23.
Caymaz, B., & Aydin, A. (2021). The effect of common knowledge construction model-based instruction on 7th grade students’ academic achievement and their views about the nature of science in the electrical energy unit at schools of different socio-economic levels. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 233–265.
Cheva, V. K., & Zainul, R. (2019). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi sifat keperiodikan unsur untuk SMA/MA kelas X. Jurnal Edukimia, 28–36.
Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning, 1–23.
Dari, R. T. U., & Sudatha, I. G. W. (2022). Upaya meningkatkan semangat belajar siswa melalui e-modul berorientasi discovery learning. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 10(2), 205–214.
Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2020). Introducing argumentation about climate change socioscientific issues in a disadvantaged school. Research in Science Education, 50, 863–883.
Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, M. (2015). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 32–37.
González‐Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2020). Acting with epistemic agency: Characterizing student critique during argumentation discussions. Science Education, 104(6), 953–982.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Herawati, N. S., & Muhtadi, A. (2018). Pengembangan modul elektronik (e-modul) interaktif pada mata pelajaran Kimia kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(2), 180–191.
Hilala, R., Laliyo, L. A. R., La Kilo, J., Tangio, J. S., Mohamad, E., & Sihaloho, M. (2023). Measuring students’ scientific argumentation skills in explaining phenomena related to acid-base concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 11(2), 360–378.
Homburger, S. A., Drits-Esser, D., Malone, M., & Stark, L. A. (2021). Building argumentation skills in the biology classroom: an evolution unit that develops students’ capacity to construct arguments from evidence. The American Biology Teacher, 83(2), 104–111.
Kundariati, M., Maghfiroh, L., Rohman, F., & Priambodo, B. (2021). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: The correlation in animal classification study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1).
Lieber, L., & Graulich, N. (2022). Investigating students’ argumentation when judging the plausibility of alternative reaction pathways in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(1), 38–54.
Lin, Y.-R., Fan, B., & Xie, K. (2020). The influence of a web-based learning environment on low achievers’ science argumentation. Computers & Education, 151, 103860.
Mabsutsah, N., & Yushardi, Y. (2022). Analisis kebutuhan guru terhadap e module berbasis steam dan kurikulum merdeka pada materi pemanasan global. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2), 205–213.
Mahmudin, M., Ratnawati, D., & Khaharsyah, A. (2022). Pengembangan e-modul sistem pendingin berbasis website google sites untuk siswa sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Dinamika Vokasional Teknik Mesin, 7(1), 29–34.
Mardiati, Y., Herlanti, Y., & Qodriyah, A. L. (2023). Student argumentation skills’ analysis on the discussion of socio-scientific issues in the concept of viruses. Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi Dan Biologi, 5(2), 150–159.
Minin, A., & Fauziah, H. N. (2022). Efektivitas model pembelajaran problem-based learning berbasis socioscientific terhadap kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 2(2), 195–204.
Nesri, F. D. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2020). Pengembangan modul ajar berbantuan teknologi untuk mengembangkan kecakapan abad 21 siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 480–492.
Odden, T. O. B., Marin, A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2021). How has science education changed over the last 100 years? An analysis using natural language processing. Science Education, 105(4), 653–680.
Rahmadhani, K., Priyayi, D. F., & Satrodihardjo, S. (2020). Kajian profil indikator kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah pada materi zat aditif dan zat adiktif. Natural: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 1–9.
Ramadhan, D. N., & Raharjo, N. E. (2023). Pengembangan modul mata pelajaran konstruksi dan utilitas gedung untuk siswa kelas XI Program Keahlian DPIB di SMK N 1 Pajangan. Jurnal Elektronik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Sipil (JEPTS), 11(2), 150–160.
Ratnawati, S., Supeno, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Efektifitas e-modul interaktif berbasis google sites mata pelajaran IPA listrik statis dan dinamis untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa MTs. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 10(1), 61–70.
Ridho, S., Ruwiyatun, R., Subali, B., & Marwoto, P. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pokok bahasan klasifikasi materi dan perubahannya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 10–15.
Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik: Problem-based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45–53.
Rojikin, M., Rasyid, R. Z., & Supeno, S. (2022). Development of e-modules to improve scientific explanation ability of students in science learning on digestive system materials. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 6(1), 1–21.
Sari, W. K., & Nada, E. I. (2021). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan kimia pada pembelajaran daring. NCOINS: National Conference Of Islamic Natural Science, 1(1), 1–10.
Septiara, D. P., & Saino, S. (2022). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis web pada mata pelajaran produk kreatif dan kewirausahaan kelas XI BDP I di SMKN 1 Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 10689–10699.
Sinatra, G. M., & Lombardi, D. (2020). Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 120–131.
Yang, X., Zhao, G., Yan, X., Chao, Q., Zhao, X., Lu, T., & Dong, Y. (2021). Pre-setting stances for students during collaborative argumentation: Parallel thinking versus adversarial thinking. Research in Science Education, 1–22.
Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H.-S. (2020). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers & Education, 143, 103668.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.