Comparison between iSpring Suites-supported PBL and PjBL Model in Improving Students Understanding of Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution

Anna Juniar, Hotma Damayanti Purba

Abstract


Abstract: This study aimed to determine whether there are significant differences in learning outcomes in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects of students who are taught with the Problem Based Learning and Project Based Learning models assisted by iSpring media on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution materials. This research method is a quasi-experiment with a two-class pretest-posttest research design. Sampling was carried out using purposive sampling technique, and class X PMIPA 3 was selected as the experimental class I which was taught using the Problem Based Learning model assisted by iSpring media and X PMIPA 4 as the experimental class II which was taught by the Project Based Learning model assisted by iSpring media. The instruments used were tests in the form of pretest posttest sheets and non-tests in the form of assessment sheets on the affective and psychomotor aspects of students. Based on the results of the study, the average cognitive aspect learning outcomes were 83.71 in the experimental class I and 80.57 in the experimental class II. The average affective learning outcomes were 55.25 in the experimental class I and 55.05 in the experimental class II. The average learning outcomes of the psychomotor aspects were 78.57 in the experimental class I and 75.02 in the experimental class II. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes in the cognitive and psychomotor aspects of the two experimental classes, while in the affective aspect there is no significant difference.         

 

Keywords: problem based learning, project based learning, iSpring, chemistry learning outcomes.

 

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada tidaknya  perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar pada aspek kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Project Based Learning berbantuan media I-spring pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit. Metode penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment dengan desain penelitian two group pretest-posttest design. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik purposive sampling, dan terpilih kelas X PMIPA 3 sebagai kelas eksperimen I yang dibelajarkan dengan model Problem Based Learning berbantuan media iSpring dan X PMIPA 4 sebagai kelas eksperimen II yang dibelajarkan dengan model Project Based Learning berbantuan media iSpring. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu tes berupa lembar pretest posttest dan non tes berupa lembar penilaian terhadap aspek afektif dan psikomotorik siswa. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh rata-rata hasil belajar aspek kognitif yaitu 83,71 pada kelas eksperimen I dan 80,57 pada kelas eksperimen II. Rata-rata hasil belajar aspek afektif yaitu 55,25 pada kelas eksperimen I dan 55,05 pada kelas eksperimen II. Rata-rata hasil belajar aspek psokomotorik yaitu 78,57 pada kelas eksperimen I dan 75,02 pada kelas eksperimen II. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil belajar pada aspek kognitif dan psikomotorik terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada kedua kelas eksperimen, sedangkan pada aspek afektif tidak terdapat perbedaan yang siginifikan.

 

Kata kunci: model pembelajaran berbasis masalah, model pembelajaran berbasis proyek, iSpring, hasil belajar kimia.


DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v24i2.pp432-441


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto. (2018). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Giilbahar, Y & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementing Project-Based Learning And E-Portofolio Assesment In an Undergraduate Course. Journal of Research on Technology In education. 3 (8), 309-327.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1980). Models of Teaching (Second Edition). New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Juraev A. R. (2019). Using The Ispring Sui Using The Ispring Suite Software To Evaluate Future Te Future Teachers' Professional Competencies. Central Asian Problems of Modern Science and Education. 4 (2), 752-759.

Khamidinal., dkk. (2009). Kimia SMA/MA kelas X. Jakarta: Pustaka Insan Madani.

Ramadhani D., Fatmawati E. & Oktarika D. (2019). Pelatihan Pembuatan Media Evaluasi dengan Menggunakan Ispring Di SMA Wisuda Kota Pontianak. GERVASI: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. 3 (1), 24-33.

Sholihah, A., Dwi, L., & Mukhtar, H. (2019). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Kimia. Chemistry Education Practice. 2 (1).

Silitonga, P. M. (2014). Statistik Teori dan Aplikasi dalam Penelitian. Medan : Fakultas FMIPA.

Syamsidah & Hamidah, S. (2018). Buku Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Mata Kuliah Pengetahuan Bahan Makanan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Trisnowati, A., Iriani, B., & Arif, S. (2020). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing. JCAE, Journal of Chemistry And Education. 3 (3), 126-132.

Umamah, C., & Andi, H. J. (2015). The Effect of Project-Based Learning Innovation in Applied Physics. 5 th ICRIEMS Proceeding, 68-75.

Widodo, S., & Dian, U. (2018). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.