Students Critical Thinking Disposition in Working on Numeration Problems
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to describe the critical thinking disposition of students in working on numeracy problems. This research is qualitative research with a descriptive research type. The instruments used are numeracy questions, student questionnaires, and interview guidelines. The subjects of this study were three grade IX students of one of the junior high schools in Kediri Regency, East Java, with high, medium, and low categories. The results showed that (1) students in the high category met the indicators of critical thinking, curiosity, open-mindedness, systematic, analytical, truth-seeking, and self-confidence (2) students in the medium category meet the indicators of critical thinking, curiosity, open thinking, systematic, and analytical (3) students with low category meet the indicators of critical thinking, curiosity, and open thinking. Based on the results and discussion of the research, it can be concluded that all students in the three categories meet different critical thinking disposition indicators.
Keywords disposition, critical thinking, numeracy.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan disposisi berpikir kritis siswa dalam mengerjakan soal numerasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah soal numerasi, angket siswa, dan pedoman wawancara. Subjek penelitian ini adalah tiga siswa kelas IX salah satu SMP di Kabupaten Kediri Jawa Timur, dengan kategori tinggi, sedang dan rendah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) siswa dengan kategori tinggi memenuhi indikator berpikir kritis rasa ingin tahu, berpikir terbuka, sistematis, analitis, mencari kebenaran, dan percaya diri (2) siswa dengan kategori sedang memenuhi indikator berpikir kritis rasa ingin tahu, berpikir terbuka, sistematis, dan analitis (3) siswa dengan kategori rendah memenuhi indikator berpikir kritis rasa ingin tahu dan berpikir terbuka. Berdasarkan hasil dan pembahasan penelitian dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa semua siswa dalam tiga kategori memenuhi indikator disposisi berpikir kritis yang beda-beda.
Kata kunci disposisi, berpikir kritis, numerasi.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acharya, A. S., Prakash A., Saxena P., Nigam A. (2013). Sampling: why and how of it? Indian Journal of Medical Specialities, 4(2), pp. 3–7. doi: 10.7713/ijms.2013.0032.
Alhamid, T. & Anufia, B. (2019). Resume:Intrumen Pengumpulan Data.STAIN, Sorong, hlm. 1–20.DOI:10.31227/osf.io/s3kr6.
Basri, H., Purwanto, As'Ari, A.R., & Sisworo. (2019). Investigating Critical Thinking Skill of Junior High School in Solving Mathematical Problem. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 745¯ 758. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.29333/iji.2019.12345a.
Bell, R. & Loon, M. (2015). The impact of critical thinking disposition on learning usingbusiness simulations. International Journal of Management Education, 13(2), 119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2015.01.002.
Diva, S. A., Khafidin, D. & Ulya H. (2022). Pengaplikasian PMRI dengan soal HOTS guna meningkatkan kompetensi literasi numerasi dalam asesmen kompetensi minimum. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, Prodi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP, Universitas Muria, Kudus, 9 Februari.
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, hlm. 43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.
Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. In: Davies M., Barnett R. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education, hlm. 31–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_2.
Facione, P. (2020). Top 10 Critical Thinking FAQs Top 10 Critical Thinking FAQs.Insight Assessment, hlm. 2019–2021. Dari : https://www. researchgate.net/publication/336589731_Top_10_Critical_Th inking_FAQs.
Facione, P. A., Giancarlo, C. A., Facione, N.C., & Gainen, J. (1955).The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44(1), hlm. 1–25. Dari: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27797240.
Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The Interplay Between Reflective Thinking, Critical Thinking, Self-Monitoring, and Academic Achievement in Higher Education. Higher Education, 74(1), hlm. 101–114. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y.
Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2018). Generating Ideas for Numeracy Tasks across the Curriculum. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, New Zealand,MERGA. 314 - 321.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_6.
Kemendikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan KebudayaanPembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–37.
Kunhertanti, K. & Santosa, R. H.2018.The Influence of Students’ Self Confidence on Mathematics Learning Achievement. Journal of Physics. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012126.
Kurniati, D., As'Ari, A. R., Abdullah, A.H., Muksar, M., & Sudirman. (2019). Impact of Infusing Truth Seeking and Open-Minded Behaviors on Mathematical Problem-Solving.Journal for Education of Gifted Young, 7(4). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29467.82729.
Kushartanti, A. (2019). Perilaku Menyontek Ditinjau dari Kepercayaan Diri. Jurnal Ilmiah Berkala Psikologi, 11(2), 38-46. Dari: ( http://hdl. handle.net/11617/1451.
Kwong, J. M. C. (2016). Open-Mindedness as a Critical Virtue. Topoi, 35, hlm. 403–411. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-015-9317-4.
Mahanal, S. (2017). Peran Guru dalam Melahirkan Generasi Emas dengan Keterampilan Abad 21. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan HMPS Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Halu Oleo, 1 September 2014, hlm. 1–16. Dari: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319746366_PERAN_GURU_D ALAM_MELAHIRKAN_GENERASI_EMAS_DENGAN_KETERAMPILAN_ABAD_21.
Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As'Ari, A.R., & Qohar, A. (2019). Analyticity and Systematicity Students of Mathematics Education on Solving Non-routine Problems Analyticity and Systematicity Students of Mathematics Education on Solving Non-routine Problems. Mathematics and Statistics, 7(2), 50¯ 55. DOI: 10.13189/ms.2019.070204.
Murtasidin, B. & Hartati, S. (2020). Demography Bonus and Policy Projection for Riau Province Youth Development. Advances in Social Science, Education andHUmanities Research, 163, 216-219. Dari: http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.
Murtiyasa, B. (2016). Isu-Isu Kunci dan Tren Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, (Knpmp I), UMS, Surakarta,12 Maret 2016. Dari: http://hdl.handle.net/11617/7051.
Nasution, E. Y. P., Pebrianti, D. & Putri, R. (2020). Analisis Terhadap Disposisi Berpikir Kritis Siswa Jurusan Ips Pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), pp. 61–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v5i1.130.
Noviani, J., Hakim, H., & Jarwandi. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Logis pada Materi Peluang di Kelas IX Smp Negeri 1 Takengon. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al-Qalasadi, 4(1), 14–23.
OECD. (2019). Programme for International Student Assesment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018. I–III, hlm. 1–10. Dari: edu.pisa@oecd.org.
Pratiwi, R. W. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Dalam Menyelesaikan Persoalan Numerasi. THEOREMS (THE jOuRnal of mathEMatics), 6(2), pp. 104–121. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.36665/ theorems.v6i2.558.
Rasid, P., Bakar, M. T., & Tonra, W. S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Disposisi Berpikir Kritis Matematis Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika pada Mata Kuliah Aljabar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Matematika, 1(2), 181–194.
Wahyu, A.,Wibowo, T., & Kurniawan, H. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Looking Back Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Sendika, 5(1), 81–87. Ware, K. & Rohaeti, E.2018. Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Tadis Kimiya, 3(1), 42–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v3i1.2219.
Watson, L. (2015). What is inquisitiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 52(3), 273–287. Dari: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475463.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.