|  Post Reply

A.gov website belongs to a main government organization in the United States.

Secure.gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// implies you've safely connected to the.gov website. Share sensitive details just on official, protected sites.

- About - The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program

- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts

- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Details for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de Contracts

- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ

Utilities

- About
- News
- Internships
- FOIA
- Contact
- Details for Journalists

- About - title=" About" About
- The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program

- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts

- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Details for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts

- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ

- Our Offices
- Find Aid
- Contact Us

Breadcrumb

1. Justice.gov
2. Office of Public Affairs
3. News
4. Press Releases
5. Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National In Relation To Alleged Plan To Steal Proprietary AI Technology

MENU News

- All News
- Blogs
- Photo Galleries
- Podcasts
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos

Archived Press Releases

Archived News

Para Notícias en Español

Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology

- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email

Note: View the superseding indictment here.

A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment today charging Linwei Ding, also referred to as Leon Ding, parentingliteracy.com 38, with seven counts of financial espionage and 7 counts of theft of trade secrets in connection with an alleged strategy to steal from Google LLC (Google) proprietary details connected to AI innovation.

Ding was at first arraigned in March 2024 on four counts of theft of trade tricks. The superseding indictment returned today explains 7 categories of trade tricks stolen by Ding and charges Ding with 7 counts of economic espionage and seven counts of theft of trade secrets.

According to the superseding indictment, Google worked with Ding as a software application engineer in 2019. Between approximately May 2022 and May 2023, Ding published more than 1,000 distinct files containing Google confidential details from Google's network to his individual Google Cloud account, consisting of the trade tricks declared in the superseding indictment.

While Ding was utilized by Google, he covertly connected himself with two People's Republic of China (PRC)- based technology companies. Around June 2022, Ding remained in conversations to be the Chief Technology Officer for an early-stage technology company based in the PRC. By May 2023, Ding had actually established his own technology business focused on AI and artificial intelligence in the PRC and was acting as the company's CEO.

The superseding indictment alleges that Ding planned to benefit the PRC government by taking trade secrets from Google. Ding presumably stole technology relating to the hardware infrastructure and software application platform that allows Google's supercomputing information center to train and passfun.awardspace.us serve large AI models. The trade secrets contain detailed details about the architecture and performance of Google's Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) chips and systems and Google's Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) systems, the software application that enables the chips to communicate and perform jobs, and utahsyardsale.com the software that manages countless chips into a supercomputer capable of training and pipewiki.org executing advanced AI work. The trade secrets likewise pertain to Google's custom-designed SmartNIC, a kind of network interface card utilized to boost Google's GPU, high performance, and trademarketclassifieds.com cloud networking items.

As declared, Ding flowed a PowerPoint presentation to staff members of his innovation company pointing out PRC national policies motivating the development of the domestic AI industry. He also produced a PowerPoint discussion containing an application to a PRC talent program based in Shanghai. The superseding indictment explains how PRC-sponsored talent programs incentivize people engaged in research and advancement outside the PRC to transmit that understanding and research to the PRC in exchange for salaries, research study funds, lab area, or other incentives. Ding's application for the talent program stated that his company's product "will help China to have calculating power infrastructure capabilities that are on par with the international level."

If founded guilty, Ding deals with a maximum penalty of 10 years in jail and approximately a $250,000 fine for each trade-secret count and 15 years in jail and $5,000,000 fine for each economic-espionage count. A federal district court judge will identify any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

The FBI is investigating the case.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Casey Boome and Molly K. Priedeman for the Northern District of California and Trial Attorneys Stephen Marzen and Yifei Zheng of the National Security Division's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.

Today's action was collaborated through the Justice and Commerce Departments' Disruptive Technology Strike Force. The Disruptive Technology Strike Force is an interagency police strike force co-led by the Departments of Justice and Commerce developed to target illegal stars, safeguard supply chains, and prevent vital innovation from being obtained by authoritarian programs and hostile nation-states.

A superseding indictment is simply a claims. All offenders are presumed innocent until tested guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a law court.

Add comment

INDEXING JOURNAL: