Differentiating Product and Process: Comparison of Students’ Learning Outcome

Rismel Fitri. Az, Faizah Qurrata 'Aini

Abstract


Abstract: Differentiated Product and Process: Comparison of Students’ Learning Outcome. The aim of this research was to identify difference the student learning outcome using differentiated process and product in chemical bonding topic. This research using quasi experimental study and post-test only design. Design on this research have 2 sample class, experiment I and experiment II. The population in this research consisted of 208 students with a sample of 68 students at SMAN 1 Pasaman. The data normality test is 0,031 for experiment I and 0,011 for experiment II. The item said data is not distributed normally and must be have nonparametric test. The hypothesis test was Mann-whitney and have 0,000 < α (0,05) with means that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. The result of student learning outcomes with differentiated process is 78,34 and the student using differentiated product is 52,72. From these data student learning outcomes, it can be concluded that the learning outcomes of students by using differentiated process significantly higher than using differentiated product.

 

Keyword: differentiated product, differentiated process, learning outcomes

 

Abstrak: Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa menggunakan Diferensiasi Proses dan Produk. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa menggunakan diferensiasi proses dan produk. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi experimental dengan desain post-test only. Desain penelitian ini dibagi menjadi dua kelas sampel yang terdiri dari kelas eksperimen I dan eksperimen II. Populasi pada penelitian ini terdiri dari 208 siswa dengan sampel 68 siswa di SMAN 1 Pasaman. Data yang diperoleh pada peneltian dilakukan uji normalitas dengan hasil 0,031 untuk kelas eksperimen I dan 0,011 untuk kelas eksperimen II. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa data yang diperoleh tidak berdistribusi secara normal sehingga dilakukan uji hipotesis nonparametrik. Uji hipotesis yang digunakan yaitu Mann-Whitney yang menunjukkan hasil 0,000 < α (0,05) dengan hasil H0 ditolak dan H1 diterima. Hasil belajar siswa yang melakukan diferensiasi proses yaitu 78,34 sementara siswa yang melakukan diferensiasi produk yaitu 52,72. Dari data hasil belajar tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil belajar siswa yang menggunakan diferensiasi proses lebih tinggi secara signifikan dibandingkan dengan siswa yang menggunakan diferensiasi produk.

 

Kata kunci: diferensiasi produk, diferensiasi proses, hasil belajar

 

DOI: 10.23960/jppk.v12.i2.2023.29


Full Text:

PDF

References


Altintas, E., & Ozdemir, A. S. (2015). The Effect of the Developed Differentiation Approach on the Achievements of the Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (61), 199-216.

Anggraena, Y., Ginanto, D., Felicia, N., Andiarti, A., Herutami, I., Alhapip, L., et al. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Menengah . Jakarta: Badan Standar, Kurikulum dan Asesmen Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Balgan, A., Renchin, T., & Ojgoosh, K. (2022). An Experiment in Applying Differentiated Instruction in STEAM Discipline. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 98, 21-37.

Borja, L. A., Soto, S. T., & Sanchez, T. X. (2015). Differentiating Instruction for EFL Learners. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(8), 30-36.

Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated Instruction, Profesional Development, and Teacher Efficacy. Journal of Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111-127.

Fitriza, Z., Aini, F. Q., Handayani, P., & Munira, I. (2020). Development of Structured Essay Diagnostic Test of Chemistry (SEDToC) to Investigate Senior High School Student’s Conception of Buffer Solution. 3rd International Seminar on Chemical Education (pp. 1-8). AIP Publishing

Frutos, P. (2013). Testing Homogeneity of Variances with Unequal sample sizes. Comput Stat, 1269-1297.

Geletu, G. M., & Mihiretie, D. M. (2022). The Effects of Primary School Teachers' Professional Development Activities on Differentiated Instructional Practices and Possibilities of Elevating Students' Learning Engagement. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 3(13), 1-16.

Gheyssens, E., Coubergs, C., Griful-Freixenet, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2020). Differentiated Instruction: the Diversity of Teachers' Philosophy and Praxis to Adapt Teaching to Students' Interest, Readiness, and Learning Profile. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-18.

Ismajli, H., & Imami-Morina, I. (2018). Differentiated Instruction: Understanding and Applying Interactive Strategies to Meet the Needs of All the Students. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 207-218.

Joseph, S. (2013). Differentiating Instruction: Experiences of Pre-Service and In-Service Trained Teachers. Carribbean Curriculum, 20, 31-51.

Joseph, S., Thomas, M., Simonette, G., & Ramsook, L. (2013). The Impact of Differentiated Instruction in a Teacher Education Setting: Successs and Challenges. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(3), 28-40.

Kemendikbud. (2022). Buku Saku Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta.

Khatun, N. (2021). Applications of Normality Test in Statistical Analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 11, 113-122.

Magableh, I. S., & Abdullah, A. (2020). On the Effectiveness of Differentiated Instruction in the Enhancement of Jordanian Students' Overall Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 533-548.

Malmia, W., Makatita, S. H., Lisaholit, S., Azwan, Maghfirah, I., Tinggapi, H., et al. (2019). Problem Based Learning as an Effort to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(9), 1140-1143.

Melesse, T. (2015). Differentiated Instruction: Perceptions, Practices, and Challenges of Primary School Teachers. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 4(3), 253-264.

Mitee, T. L., & Obaitan, G. N. (2015). Effect of Mastery Learning on Senior Secondary High School Students' Cognitive Learning Outcome in Quantitative Chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(5), 34-38.

Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or Non-Parametric: Skewness to Test Normality for Mean Comparison. International Journal of Assesment Tools in Education, 7(2), 255-265.

Pednekar, S., Kulkarni, R. D., & Mahanwar, P. (2022). Statistical Methods and Testing of Hypothesis. Vidyanagari, Mumbai: Institute of Distance and Open Learning.

Rahayu, D. S., & Fitriza, Z. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Pada Materi Ikatan Kimia : Sebuah Studi Literatur. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 1084 - 1091.

Sedeṅo, M. M., Villamor, G. T., & Masuhay, E. P. (2021). Differentiated Instruction in General Chemistry. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(4), 323-330.

Siam, K., & Al-Natour, M. (2016). Teachers Differentiated Instruction Practice and Implementation Challenges for Learning Disabilities in Jordan. International Education Studies, 9(12), 167-181.

Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Reserch Evidence. Frontiers in Phsychololy, 10, 1-23.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Taylor, B. K. (2015). Content, Process, and Product: Modelling Differentiated Instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(1), 13-17.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate instruction in Mixed Ability Classroom 2nd Edition. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and Managing A differentiated Classroom 2nd Edition. Arlington, VA: ASCD.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.