Development of Chemical Literacy Test Instruments on Electrolyte and Nonelectrolyte Solution Topic

Zelen Surya Minata, Parlan Parlan, Ida Bagus Suryadharma

Abstract


This study aims to develop items about chemical literacy in electrolyte solution materials and nonelectrolyte solutions. This research applies research and development methods with ADDIE development model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Instrument trial samples of 135 students of class XI and XII of one of the public high schools in Pasuruan Regency with the criteria of having received learning on electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solution topic. Content validation by expert validators shows an average value of 95% so it is categorized as excellent. The results of empirical validity showed the result that 25 questions were declared valid with a cronbach alpha value of 0.797 with a very high degree of consistency. Furthermore, the differentiation of all question items is stated to be very good with 3 questions categorized as difficult and 22 questions categorized as moderate.  

Keywords: Assessment instruments, chemical literacy, electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solutions.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jppk.v11.i3.2022.07

 



Full Text:

PDF

References


Adadan, E., & Savasci, F. (2012). An analysis of 16-17-year-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 513–544.

Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 361–373.

Anggraeni, A. Y., & Wardani, S. (2020). Profil Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Kontekstual. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(1), 2512–2523.

Arabbani, F. K., Mulyani, S., Mahardiani, L., & Ariani, S. R. D. (2019). Analysis the quality of instrument for measuring chemical literacy abilities of high school student using Rasch model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194(December).

Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Aslamiah, A., Abbas, E. W., & Mutiani, M. (2021). 21st-Century Skills and Social Studies Education. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 2(2), 82.

Calik, M. (2005). A cross-age study of different perspectives in solution chemistry from junior to senior high school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 671–696.

Chen, C. W., & Osman, C. (2017). Cultivating Marginalized Children’s Scientific Literacy in Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century Cindy. K-12 STEM Education, 3(1), 157–167.

Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2015). Improving Students’ Chemical Literacy Level on Thermochemical and Thermodynamics Concepts through Context-Based Approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3, 10715–10722.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantittaive and Qualitative Research (Fourth Edi). Pearson.

Devetak, I., Lorber Drofenik, E. D., Juriševič, M., & Glažar, S. A. (2009). Comparing Slovenian year 8 and year 9 elementary school pupils’ knowledge of electrolyte chemistry and their intrinsic motivation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(4), 281–290.

Fahmina, S. S., Indriyanti, N. Y., Setyowati, W. A. E., Masykuri, M., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Dimension of Chemical Literacy and its Influence in Chemistry Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1).

Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116.

Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific literacy and science learning achievement at junior high school. 8(4), 630–636.

Lu, S., Bi, H., & Liu, X. (2019). A phenomenographic study of 10th grade students’ understanding of electrolytes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 204–212.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science - Eighth Grade Science.

Muntholib, Ibnu, S., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., Kusairi, S., & Kuswandi, B. (2020). Chemical literacy: Performance of first year chemistry students on chemical kinetics. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 20(2), 468–482.

Nur, A., & Santi, I. (2022). Analysis of Students Misconceptio on Electrolyte and Non Elektrolyte Solutions Using Multiplerepresentation Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Based Pictorial. Unesa Journal Of Chemical Education, 11(3), 210–219.

OECD. (2016). Overview: Excellence and Equity in Education: Vol. I.

OECD. (2018). PISA 2018: Insight and Interpretations. OECD Publishing.

Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1).

Rohim, D. C. (2021). Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 33(1), 54–62.

Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225.

Stowe, R. L., & Cooper, M. M. (2019). Assessment in Chemistry Education. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6), 598–607.

Suja, I. W., Sudiana, I. K., Redhana, I. W., & Sudria, I. B. N. (2021). Mental Model of Prospective Chemistry Teachers on Electrolyte and Nonelectrolyte Solutions. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1115(1), 012064.

Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2016). Construction of a chemical literacy test for engineering students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(3), 185–198.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116.

Yacoubian, H. A. (2018). Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308–327.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.