PEMBELAJARAN SIMAYANG TIPE II UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN METAKOGNISI DAN KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS

Andayu Fitri Talisna, Sunyono Sunyono, Emmawaty Sofya

Abstract


This research aimed to describe the effectiveness and practicality of SiMaYang type II learning model to improve metacognition ability and science process skills on electrolyte and non electrolyte solution topic. This research applied One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The samples on this research were first-year secondary students (X2 and X13classes) in SMAN 8 Bandar Lampung. The effectiveness of SiMaYang type II learning model was measured by the enhancement of metacognition ability, science process skills, students activity, and assessment of teachers ability. The practicality of SiMaYang type II learning model was measured by the implementation of the lesson plan and students responses. The results showed that the effectiveness of SiMaYang type II were categorized on high, and the the practicality of this learning model had a very high criteria.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektivan dan kepraktisan model pembelajaran SiMaYang tipe II untuk meningkatkan kemampuan metakognisi dan keterampilan proses sains pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan One Group Pretest-Posttest Desain. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas sepuluh (kelas X2 dan X13) SMAN 8 Bandar Lampung. Keefektivan model pembelajaran SiMaYang tipe II diukur berdasarkan peningkatkan kemampuan metakognisi, keterampilan proses sains, aktivitas siswa dan penilaian kemampuan guru. Kepraktisan model pembelajaran SiMaYang Tipe II diukur berdasarkan keterlaksanaan RPP dan respon siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keefektivan Model SiMaYang tipe II berkategori tinggi, dan kepraktisan dalam pembelajaran ini memiliki kriteria yang sangat tinggi.

Kata kunci: keefektivan, kepraktisan, metakognisi, proses sains, SiMaYang tipe II


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afdila, D., Sunyono & Efkar, T. 2015. Penerapan Simayang Tipe II pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non-Elektrolit. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 4 (1): 248-261.

Ango, M.L. 2002. Mastery of Science Process Skills and Their Effective Use in the Teaching of Science: An Educology of Science Education in the Nigerian Context. International Journal of Educology, 1 (16): 11-20.

Dewi, S. 2008. Keterampilan Proses Sains. Bandung: Tinta Emas Publishing.

Dunning, D., Jhonson. K., Ehrlinger. J., & Kruger. J. 2003. Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12 (3): 65-76.

Johnstone, A. H. 1991. Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things are Seldom What They Seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. (Online), 7 (2): 75-83. (http://www.researchgate. Net / publication /227948144_ Why_is_ science_difficult_to_learn_Things_are_seldom_what_they_seem.), diakses 2 Januari 2016.

Mulyasa, E. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Nugraha, A.W. 2005. Penerapan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses IPA pada Praktikum Kimia Fisika II di Jurusan Kimia FMIPA UNIMED melalui Kegiatan Praktikum Terpadu. Journal Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan, 11(2): 107-112.

Nugrahaningsih, T. K. 2012. Metakognisi Siswa SMA Akselerasi dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Magistra, 82(26): 37-50.

OECD (Organization for Ecomonic Co-operation and Development). 2013. PISA 2012 Assesment and Analytical Framework: matemathics, reading, science, problemsolving, and financial literacy. (Online), (http: //www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management /oecd/education/pisa-2012- assessment-and-analytical-framework _9789264190511-en.), diakses 2 desember 2015.

Ogawa, H., Fujii, H., & Sumida, M. 2009. Development of a Lesson Model in Chemistry through Special Emphasis on Imagination Leading to Creation (SEIC). Chemical Education Journal (CEJ). (Online), 13 (1): 1-6. (http://chem. sci.-utsunomiya-u.ac.jp/cejrnIE.html.), diakses 13 Maret 2016.

Saraswati, E., Rusdi. M., & Syamsurizal. 2011. Problem Based Learning, Strategi Metakognisi, dan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Tekno Pedagogi, 1(2): 1-14.

Schraw, G., & Dennison. R. S. 1994. Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psycology, 19 (4): 460-475.

Sunyono, Wirya, I. W., Suyadi, G., & Suyanto. E. 2009. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kimia Berorientasi Keterampilan Generik Sains pada Pebelajar SMA di Provinsi Lampung. Jakarta: Laporan Penelitian Hibah Bersaing Tahun I Dikti.

Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. 2012. Analisis Keterlaksanaan dan Kemenarikan Model Pembelajaran SiMaYang dalam Membangun Model Mental Mahasiswa pada Topik Stoikiometri. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, 6 Oktober 2012.

Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. 2015a. Mental Models of Students on Stoichiometry Concept in Learning by Method Based on Multiple Representation. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5 (2): 30-45.

Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. 2015b. Supporting Students in Learning with Multiple Representation to Improve Student Mental Models on Atomic Structure Concepts. Science Education International, 26 (2): 104-125.

Talanquer, V. 2011. Macro, Sub-micro, and Symbolic: The Many Faces of the Chemistry "Triplet". International Journal of Science Education, 33 (2): 179-195.

Treagust, D.F., Chittleborough, G. D., & Mamiala. 2003. The Role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. Int. J. Sci. Educ, 25 (11): 1353-1368.

Wicaksono, C.A.G. 2014. Hubungan Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Berpikir Kritis terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Biologi dengan Strategi Reciprocal Teaching. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(2): 85-92.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.