PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT BERBASIS SCIENTIFIC APPROACH PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPA TERPADU
Abstract
This development research was aimed to develop performance assessment instrument in integrated science learning and describe appropriateness, easiness, and the benefit of using products of development result. The development included the potentials and problems, gathering the data, product design, validity design, revision design, product test, revision product, and the production. The final products had been proper used with the percentage 81,9% which means that it was very high. The instrument had been valid in appropriateness aspect with the percentage of 83,4% which means it was very high. Beside that, the instrument had been valid in easiness aspect with the percentage 80,5% which means it was very high. Instrument also had been valid in the benefit aspect with the percentage 84,9% which means that it was very high.
Penelitian pengembangan ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen performance assessment berbasis scientific approach pada pembelajaran IPA Terpadu serta mendeskripsikan kesesuaian, kemudahan, dan kemanfaatan penggunaan produk hasil pengembangan tersebut menurut pendapat guru. Pengembangan tersebut meliputi potensi dan masalah, pengumpulan data, desain produk, validasi desain, revisi desain, uji coba produk, revisi produk, uji coba pemakaian, revisi produk, dan produksi. Produk akhir sudah layak digunakan dengan persentase 81,9% yang berarti sangat tinggi. Instrumen sudah valid dalam aspek kesesuaian dengan persentase 83,4% yang berarti sangat tinggi. Selain itu, instrumen sudah valid dalam aspek kemudahan dengan persentase 80,5% yang berarti sangat tinggi. Instrumen juga sudah valid dalam aspek kemanfaatan dengan persentase 84,9% yang berarti sangat tinggi.
Kata kunci: instrumen performance assessment, pembelajaran IPA Terpadu, scientific approach
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Airasian, P. W., and Russel, M. K. 2008. Classroom Assessment: Concepts and Applications (6rd ed). New York: Mc. Graw Hill.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1997. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Atsnan, M.F., dan Rahmita Yuliana Gazali. 2013. Penerapan Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas VII Materi Bilangan (Pecahan). (Prosiding). Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Burke, Kay. 2006. From Standards to Rubrics in 6 Steps. California: Corwin Press.
Chabalengula, Vivien Mweene, Frackson Mumba, dan Simeon Mbewe. 2012. How Pre-service Teachers Understand and Perform Science Process Skills. Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. Hal: 167-176.
Ferrara, S., dan J. McTighe. 1992. Assessment: A Thoughful Process. Palatine IL: Skylight Publisihing.
Hutabarat, O. R. 2004. Model-model Penilaian Berbasis Kompetensi PAK. Bandung: Bina Media Informasi. Kimberlin,
Carole L. Dan Winterstein, Almut G. 2008. Validity and Reliability of Measurement Instruments Used in Research. Am J Health-SystPharm. Vol 65 Dec 1, 2008. Hal 2279.
Koballa, Thomas R dan Eugene L. Chiappetta. 2010. Science Instruction in The Middle and Secondary Schools. USA: Pearson Education.
Marzano, R. J., et al. 1993. Assessing Student Outcomes: Performance Assessment Using the Five dimensions of Learning Model. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Matondang, Zulkifli. 2010. Penyusunan Instrumen/Tes Standar. (Online), (http://digilib.unimed.ac.id, diakses 18 Februari 2015)
Maulana, Nila, dkk. 2012. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Membaca Kelas VII SMP. (Prosiding). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Moskal, Barbara M. 2000. Scoring Rubrics: What, When, How? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. (Online), (http://ericae. net, diakses 27 September 2014).
Nitko, A. J. 2001. Educational Assessment of Students (3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2013. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia No. 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta.
Quinn, James A. 1905. Reliability and Validity. School of Journalism & Mass Communication. Hal 6-7. (Online), (http://cla.umn.edu, diakses 28 November 2014).
Rna, Kiky. 2013. Kata Kerja Operasional Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. (Online), (http://kikychan.93.blogspot.com, diakses 28 November 2014).
Uliana. 2009. Kriteria Instrumen Evaluasi. (Online), (http://stahdnj.ac.id, diakses pada 18 Februari 2015).
Wren, Douglas G. 2009. Performance Assessment: A Key Component Of A Balanced Assessment System. Research Brief. Report From The Department Of Reseacrh Evaluation, and Assessment. No 2. Hal: 2.
Zainul, A. 2001. Alternative Assessment. Applied Approach Mengajar di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Pusat Antar Universitas Untuk Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Aktivitas Instruksional. Ditjen Dikti Depdiknas.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika
Copyright of the article is reserved by the author(s). Published by the Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung in Collaboration with the Physical Society of Indonesia (since 2019). This article is an open-access article under the Creative Commons non-commercial-share-alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.