Concept Mapping in Group of Peer Review on Students’ Writing Skill

Dita Yusmelita Sari, Patuan Raja, Tuntun Sinaga

Abstract


Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui apakah ada perubahan dalam prestasi menulis siswa sebelum dan sesudah implementasi pemetaan konsep dan masalah apa yang dihadapi siswa dalam pelaksanaan pemetaan konsep dalam review sejawat pada pencapaian menulis. Sampel, yang diambil secara purposive, adalah 25 siswa kelas sepuluh. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes menulis dan wawancara. Berdasarkan perhitungan, pretest yang terdiri dari 25 siswa memiliki nilai rata-rata 68,80 dan posttest memiliki nilai rata-rata 75,00. Berdasarkan perhitungan, baik pada taraf signifikansi 0,05 dan 0,01> ttabel, Ho ditolak dan Ha diterima. Ini berarti bahwa ada perbedaan yang signifikan setelah penerapan pemetaan konsep dalam mengajar menulis kepada siswa. Prestasi menulis siswa setelah menggunakan pemetaan konsep dalam kelompok review sejawat meningkat.

This current research was conducted in order to find out whether there were any changes in students’ writing achievement before and after the implementation of concept mapping and what problems did the students face in the implementation of concept mapping in peer review on writing achievement. The samples, who were taken purposively, were 25 students of the tenth grader. The instruments used in this study were writing pretest and posttest and interview.Based on the calculation, the pretest that consists of 25 students has a mean score of 68.80 and the posttest has mean score 75.00. Based on the calculation, both on the significance level of 0.05 and 0.01 tcalculation> ttable, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It means that there is a significant difference after the implementation of concept mapping in teaching writing to the students. The students’ writing achievement after using concept mapping in the group of peer review is increased.

Keywords: Concept mapping, group of peer review, writing skill.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, D.(2008). Introduction to research in education.New York: Nelson Education Ltd.

Broad, Bob. (2003). What we really value, beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing. Utah: Utah State University Press.

Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd). New York: Longman.

Creswell, John. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.Boston: Pearson Education.

Fraenkel, E Jack &Wallen, E Norman.(1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: Mc. Graw Hill.

Gall, M., Joyce, P.G., & Borg, W.R. (2003). Educational research. boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Mohamed, Wan Azlinda Wan & Omar, Badrul. (2008). Using concept map to facilitate writing assignment. Proc. of the Third Int. Conference on Concept Mapping Tallinn, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1-4.

Nobahar, B., Tarmizy, A.R.N., and Shagaghi M. (2013).The effect of concept mapping on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ self-efficacy and expository writing accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 11, pp. 2117-2127.

Yarrow, F. & Topping, K. J. (2001).Collaborative learning : The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. (British Journal of Educational Psychology) Volume 71, Issue 2, pp. 55-70.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 U-JET

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.