Analyzing Students' Commognitive Processes in Solving Pythagorean Theorem Problems: A Gender-Based
Abstract
Abstract: This study describes students' cognitive in solving Pythagorean theorem problems in terms of gender. The research design used is explorative with a qualitative descriptive approach. The research subjects selected were 2 students, namely 1 male student and 1 female student. Data collection was carried out using written assignments and interviews. Checking the quality of the research results using data credibility is done by extending involvement, increasing persistence, discussions with peers, and membercheck and dependability. Data analysis techniques used in this research are data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The results showed that male and female students had raised all commognitive indicators. Male and female students can generally bring up keywords in the form of the words "area of a right triangle 25 ", "perimeter = K", and "hypotenuse c in k". Male students wrote very brief information while female students wrote clear and complete information. The description of the solution written by male and female students is different. The differences found were the use of visual mediators such as visualizing. Male students generalized a as height, b as base, c as hypotenuse while female students generalized a as base, b as height, c as hypotenuse. Endorsed narratives carried out by male and female students can write the formula for the hypotenuse of the Pythagorean theorem, the formula for the area of a right triangle, the formula for the perimeter of a right triangle and the factoring formula. Male and female students can also express the definition of the formula in solving Pythagorean theorem problems. Routines performed by male and female students can choose the right concepts and methods so that they have a good effect on the results of their solutions.
Keywords: commognitive, pythagorean theorem, gender.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i4.pp1839-1853
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adila, K., & Harisah, Y. (2020). Perception of class X MIPA students of SMA Negeri 1 Bojong towards online learning in mathematics lessons. National Seminar on Mathematics Education, 1(1), 401-406. https://proceeding.unikal.ac.id/ index.php/sandika/article/view/433
Baehaqi, M. R., Parta, I. N., & Chandra, T. D. (2023). Written mathematical communication ability of visual learning style students in solving problems in view of gender differences. Cendekia Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 550-561. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1978
Indonesia, P. P. R. (2022). Government regulation number 57 of 2022 on the implementation of higher education by other ministries and non-ministerial government institutions. 148631, 1–23. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/ 233385/pp-no-57-tahun-2022
Khiyarusoleh, M.Pd, U. (2016). Keywords: basic concepts, cognitive development, Jean Piaget.5 (1), 1-10. https://journal.peradaban.ac.id/index.php/jdpgsd/article/view/17
Lefrida, R., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Lukito, A. (2021). Process-oriented routines of students in heterogeneous field dependent-independent groups: a commognitive perspective on solving derivative tasks. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 2017-2032. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1318606
Lestari, A. S. B. L., Afifah, A., & Supriyo. (2023). Analysis of mathematical commognitive of junior high school students in solving story problems in pairs. Journal of Mathematics Education (JPM), 9(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v9i2.20105
Lestari, A. S. B., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., Chandra, T. D., & Indrawatiningsih, N. (2021). Exploring the argumentation skills of prospective teachers based on commognitive approach using moodle LMS. TEM Journal, 10(3), 1370-1376. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM103-46
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook edition 3. In SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-data-analysis/book246128
Pratama, R. Y., Arjudin, A., Hikmah, N., & Subarinah, S. (2022). Analysis of mathematical literacy ability in solving spltv story problems based on gender differences. Scientific Journal of Education Profession,7 (3b), 1472-1481. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i3b.792
Putri, F. F. W., & Dr. Masiyah, M. P. (2019). Profile of junior high school students' reasoning ability in solving mathematical problems based on personality type and gender. Scientific Journal of Mathematics Education, Mathedunesa, 8(1), 38-45. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/26522
Raharjo, E. Y., Subanji, S., & Sisworo, S. (2024). Commognitive of junior high school students in solving mathematics problems in terms of gender. AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 13(2), 752-763. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i2.8791
Rahmawati. Z, Y. (2020). Realistic mathematics approach with ethnomathematics nuances: rumah gadang minangkabau on pythagorean theorem material. Azimut Journal, 3(SMAR), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.31317/jaz.v3ismar.636
Rangkuti, A. N., & Siregar, A. I. (2019). Learning trajectory of pythagorean theorem with realistic mathematics education approach. Logarithm: Journal of Education and Science Sciences,7 (02), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v7i02.2112
Santoso, I. B., Sholihah, U., & Asmarani, D. (2024). Students' commognitive on problem solving SPLDV Materials at SMK PGRI KRAS Kediri. Journal of Science Education and Research, 03(01), 37-48. http://jurnal.serambimekkah.ac.id/index.php/perisai/article/view/622
Setyowati, S., Purwanto, & Sudirman. (2022). Commognitive analysis of students in solving circle problems in view of learning style. Cendekia Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education, 06(02), 2336-2351. https://j-cup.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/1625
Siregar, N. F. (2018). Mathematical communication in mathematics learning. 06(02), 74-84. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=komunikasi+in+ two+forms+namely+oral+and+written+communication+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1736647177632&u=%23p%3DITbTvHtgPJoJ
Tunu, D. J. I., Daniel, F., & Gella, N. J. M. (2022). Analysis of students' mathematics story problem solving ability in terms of gender. Journal of Scholarship: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 1499-1511. https://doi.org/10.31004/ cendekia.v6i2.1366
Umaroh, U., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analysis of students' mathematical representation ability in working on PISA Problems in View of Gender Differences. Raflesia Journal of Mathematics Education, 05(02), 40-53. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/jpmr/article/view/11408
Zayyadi, D. M., & Pratiwi, D. E. (2022). Thinking and communication in a commognitive framework. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366425760_Berpikir_Dan_ Komunikas_Dalam_Kerangka_Commognitive
Zayyadi, M., Lutfiyah, & Pratiwi, E. (2023). Analysis of students' commognitive in solving non-routine problems. Axioma Journal: Journal of Mathematics and Learning, 8(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.56013/axi.v8i1.1990
Zulfitria, Z., Rahmatunnisa, S., & Khanza, M. (2021). The use of storytelling methods in the development of cognitive skills in early childhood. Yaa Bunayya: Journal of Early Childhood Education, 5(1), 53-60. https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/ YaaBunayya/article/view/9300
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.