Developing Students’ Speaking Through Drama Performance Of SMK Negeri 1 Metro

Suci Lestari, Hery Yufrizal, Ari Nurweni

Abstract


Artikel ini menunjukkan perbedaan antara keterampilan berbicara siswa dan aspek-aspeknya sebelum dan sesudah pelaksanaan drama di SMKN 1 Metro. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi-eksperimental dengan satu kelompok desain pre-test post-test. Penelitian ini menerapkan drama pada keterampilan berbicara siswa. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa pretest berbicara memiliki skor 66,93 dan posttest memiliki skor rata-rata 74,93. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa sig (2 tailed) adalah 0,000. Itu berarti bahwa sig (0,027) <α (0,05 = 2,919). Dapat disimpulkan bahwa ada perbedaan keterampilan berbicara siswa sebelum dan sesudah diajarkan oleh drama dan ada peningkatan yang signifikan antara pretest berbicara dan posttest berbicara. Singkatnya, mengimplementasikan drama memberikan perbedaan yang signifikan dalam pengajaran berbicara. Selain itu, berdasarkan perhitungan, peneliti menemukan bahwa aspek kelancaran dalam keterampilan berbicara sebagai pertanyaan penelitian kedua dan suara dalam kinerja drama sebagai pertanyaan penelitian ketiga dapat diklasifikasikan menjadi aspek yang paling meningkatkan dalam penelitian ini.

This article points out the significant difference of students’ speaking skill and their aspects before and after the implementation of drama in SMKN 1 Metro. This is a quasi-experimental research with one group pre-test post-test design. It applies drama performance on students’ speaking skill. The result of data analysis shows that the pretest of speaking has mean score 66.93 and the posttest has mean score 74.93. The result of data analysis shows that sig (2 tailed) is 0.000. It means that sig (0.027) < α (0.05=2.919). It can be concluded that there is difference of students’ speaking skill before and after taught by drama and there is significant improvement between pretest of speaking and posttest of speaking. Shortly, implementing drama gives significant difference in teaching speaking. In addition, based on the calculation, the researcher found out that the aspect of fluency in speaking skill as the second research question and voice in drama performance as the third research question can be classified to be the aspect that improves the most in this research.

Keywords: Drama performance, speaking skill, teaching speaking.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albalawi, B. R. (2014). Effectiveness of Teaching English Subject using Drama on the Development of Students' Creative Thinking. Journal of Research and Method in Education, e-ISSN: 2320–7388, p-ISSN: Volume 4, Issue 6, Ver. I, pp. 54-63

Almond, M. (2005). Teaching English with Drama. How to use drama and plays when teaching–for the professional language teacher. Chichester: Keyways Publishing Ltd.

Campbell, Margaret P. (2008). The Infusion of Theater Arts in the Teaching of Language Arts: Its Impact on the Academic Achievement of Fifth Grade Students. PHD Dissertation, College of Education and Human Services, Seton Hall University. UMI Number : 3448-171.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Clipson-Boyles, S. (1998). Drama in Primary English Teaching. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.

Dobson, Julia M., (1981). Effective Techniques for English Conversation Group. Washington, D.C: Newbury House.

Fraenkel, E Jack and Wallen, E Norman. (1993). How To Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Boston: Mc. Graw Hill.

Gall, M., Joyce, P.G., and Borg, W.R., (2003). Educational Statistic. Boston: Allyn Bacon.

Gomez, David Izquierdo (2010). Using drama to improve oral skills in the ESL classroom. International Schools Journal Vol. XXX No.1, pp. 50-60.

Heikkinen, H. (2005). Drama Education Teaching, the Art of Examination! Jyväskylä: Minerva.

Irsan, Suti. (2016). The Correlation Between Students’ Poetry Appreciation And Arcs Motivation After Learning By Using An Online Learning Service. Lampung: Lampung University.

Johnson, B. and Christensen, Larry B (2004). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approach. Hillsboro: Allyn and Bacon.

Mason, E. J. and Bramble, W. J. (1997). Understanding and Conducting Research: Applications in education and the behavioral sciences. Madison: McGraw-Hill.

Noaman, Nabil N. (2013). Literature And Language Skill. AL-USTATH No 204 Volume Two 2013AD, 1434 AH. pp. 123-134.

Ormrod, Jeanne Ellis. (2011). Educational Psychology. Seventh Edition. Boston: Pearson.

Richards, J.C. and Renandya W.A. (Eds). (2002). Methodology in language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. and Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Fourth edition. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.

Saputra, J. B. (2015). Communicative Language Teaching: Changing Students’ Speaking Skill. Premise: Journal of English Education, 4(1), pp 1-14.

Sarıçoban, A. (2004). Using Drama in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. ISSN 1302-597X No.14, pp: 13-32.

Spratt, M., Pulverness, A. and Williams, M. (2005). The TKT (Teaching Knowledge Test) Course. London: Cambridge University Press.

Thornbury, Scott. (2005). How To Teach Speaking. New York: Longman.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 U-JET

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.