Email this article The New Student Admission System in DKI Jakarta in 2020-2021: Perceptions of Parents, Students, and Teachers
Abstract
Abstract: The New Student Admission System in DKI Jakarta: Perceptions of Parents, Students, and Teachers. Objective: This qualitative research aims to explore the perceptions of parents, students, and teachers regarding PPDB in DKI Jakarta. Methods: This research adopts a phenomenological approach. Data collected through semi-structured interviews with 22 parents, 14 students, and 3 teachers at one junior high school in East Jakarta were analyzed using typological analysis. Findings: The research results indicate that the majority of informants are more in favor of using the distance between home and school rather than age as a selection criterion. Additionally, the majority of participants believe that students' academic achievements are the fairest selection criterion compared to others because it values students' diligence in learning and fosters a competitive spirit. Conclusion: A PPDB system that ensures the right to quality education is the aspiration of parents, students, and teachers. Therefore, efforts to equalize the quality and distribution of public schools are highly necessary to achieve the goals of PPDB.
Keywords:admission of new student, junior high school, perception, selection criteria, phenomenology.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agasisti, T., Melo, R. Q. E., & Maranto, R. (2023). School choice in Europe. Journal of School Choice, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2023.2169808
Angus, L. (2013). School choice: Neoliberal education policy and imagined futures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.823835
Ardi, Danil, M., Murni, D., Giastituati, N., Rusdinal, & Hervi, F. (2023). The implementation of student admission based on zoning in Indonesia: problems, challenges, and solutions. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 9(3), 914–923. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.8632
Arif, S. (2020). Pola penerimaan peserta didik baru berbasis zonasi di SMPN dan SMAN Pamekasan [The pattern of new student admissions based on zoning in public junior high school and public senior high school in Pamekasan]. Nuansa Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam, 17(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.19105/nuansa.v17i2.3526
Azanella, L. A. (2019, June 20). Zonasi dinilai malah membuat mutu pendidikan rendah akan merata [Zoning is considered to actually result in a more evenly distributed low quality of education]. Kompas. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2019/06/20/11465771/zonasi-dinilai-malah-membuat-mutu-pendidikan-rendah-akan-merata?page=all
Berkhout, E., Dharmawan, G., Beatty, A., Suryadarma, D., & Pradhan, M. (2022). Who benefits and loses from large changes to student composition? Assessing impacts of lowering school admissions standards in Indonesia (No. 22; 094). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2022/094
Böhlmark, A., Holmlund, H., & Lindahl, M. (2016). Parental choice, neighbourhood segregation or cream skimming? An analysis of school segregation after a generalized choice reform. Journal of Population Economics, 29(4), 1155–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-016-0595-y
Bunar, N., & Ambrose, A. (2016). Schools, choice and reputation: Local school markets and the distribution of symbolic capital in segregated cities. Research in Comparative & International Education, 11(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916631064
Burgess, S., Greaves, E., & Vignoles, A. (2019). School choice in England: evidence from national administrative data. Oxford Review of Education, 45(5), 690–710. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1604332
Carrasco, A., Gutiérrez, G., & Flores, C. (2017). Failed regulations and school composition: Selective admission practices in Chilean primary schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(5), 642–672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1312549
Chaterine, R. N. (2020). Protes syarat usia PPDB DKI, ortu: yang tua ikut kejar paket saja [protests against the age requirement in DKI school admissions, Parents: The older students should pursue equivalency programs instead]. DetikNews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5068334/protes-syarat-usia-ppdb-dki-ortu-yang-tua-ikut-kejar-paket-saja
Dai, T., Liu, Z., Liao, C., & Cai, H. (2019). Toward equal opportunity of primary education: Introducing a lottery into China’s proximity-based enrollment system. professional geographer, 71(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2018.1501712
DeAngelis, C. A., & Erickson, H. H. (2018). What leads to successful school choice programs? A review of the theories and evidence. Cato Journal, 38(1), 247–263. https://www.cato.org/cato-journal/winter-2018/what-leads-successful-school-choice-programs-review-theories-evidence
Denice, P., & Gross, B. (2016). Choice, preferences, and constraints: Evidence from public school applications in Denver. Sociology of Education, 89(4), 300–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040716664395
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Driana, E. (2018, July 13). Menimbang sistem zonasi [Considering the zoning system]. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2018/07/13/menimbang-sistem-zonasi
Education Office of DKI Jakarta. (2020). Keputusan kepala dinas pendidikan provinsi daerah khusus ibukota jakarta nomor 501 tahun 2020 tentang petunjuk teknis penerimaan peserta didik baru tahun pelajaran 2020/2021 [the decree of the head of the education office of the special capital region of jakarta province number 501 of 2020 https://www.smkn2jkt.sch.id/file/pdf/SK%20No.%20501_2020%20Ttg%20JUKNIS%20PPDB%202020.pdf
Elvira. (2021). Faktor- faktor pengambilan keputusan orang tua dalam memilih sekolah menengah atas wilayah Jakarta Timur [Factors influencing parental decision-making in selecting a high school in East Jakarta region]. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 8(2), 11–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34308/eqien.v8i2.235
Ely, T. L., & Teske, P. (2015). Implications of public school choice for residential location decisions. Urban Affairs Review, 51(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414529120
Exley, S. (2020). Selective schooling and its relationship to private tutoring: The case of South Korea. Comparative Education, 56(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1687230
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Educational Settings. State University of New York Press, Albany.
Jabbar, H., Fong, C. J., Germain, E., Li, D., Sanchez, J., Sun, W.-L., & Devall, M. (2019). The competitive effects of school choice on student achievement: A systematic review. Educational Policy, 36(2), 247–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819874756
Kasiati, Muljono, H., & Kusumawati, E. (2021). Evaluasi implementasi PPDB zonasi dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di SMPN 107 Jakarta [Evaluation of the implementation of zoning-based student admissions (PPDB) in improving the quality of education at SMPN 107 Jakarta]. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v28i1.32095
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2017). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republik indonesia nomor 17 tahun 2017 tentang penerimaan peserta didik baru pada taman kanak-kanak, sekolah dasar, sekolah menengah pertama, sekolah menengah atas, sekolah menengah kejuruan, atau bentuk lainnya [regulation of the minister of education and culture of the republic of indonesia no. 17 of 2017 about admissions of new students in kindergarten, elementary school, junior high school, senior high school, vocational school, or other forms]. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/index.php/files/download/d62bcdd6c2e6631
Kosunen, S., Bernelius, V., Seppänen, P., & Porkka, M. (2020). School choice to lower secondary schools and mechanisms of segregation in urban Finland. Urban education, 55(10), 1461-1488.
Liu, S., & Apple, M. W. (2016). Parental choice of school, class strategies, and educational inequality: An essay review of school choice in China—A different tale?( X. Wu, New York, NY: Routledge, 2014, 168 pp. ISBN 978-0-415-81769-1). Educational Policy, 30(6), 940–955. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816653633
Lova, C. (2019, June 19). Orangtua: PPDB sistem zonasi tidak adil, anak bisa kalah dengan yang nilainya lebih rendah [Parents: Zoning system in PPDB is unfair, children might lose out to those with lower grades]. Kompas. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2019/06/19/19284581/orangtua-ppdb-sistem-zonasi-tak-adil-anak-bisa-kalah-dengan-yang-nilainya?page=all
McShane, M. Q., & Eden, M. (2015). Encouraging efficiency, rewarding quality: Lessons for school choice policy and practice. Journal of School Choice, 9(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2015.998968
Morris, R. (2014). The admissions criteria of secondary Free Schools. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921614
Oh, S. J., & Sohn, H. (2019). The impact of the school choice policy on student sorting: Evidence from Seoul, South Korea. Policy Studies, 6(2), 158–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2012.673854
Perdana, N. S. (2019). Implementasi PPDB Zonasi dalam upaya pemerataan akses dan mutu pendidikan [The Implementation of zoning-based new student admission in efforts to equalize access and quality of education]. Jurnal Pendidikan Glasser, 3(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.32529/glasser.v3i1.186
Põder, K., Lauri, T., & Veski, A. (2017). Does school admission by zoning affect educational inequality? A study of family background effect in Estonia, Finland, and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(6), 668–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1173094
Pradita, A. P. (2020). Persepsi orangtua terhadap sistem zonasi DKI Jakarta tahun pelajaran 2019/2020 [Parental perceptions of the zoning system in DKI Jakarta for the academic year 2019/2020]. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 13(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.33541/jdp.v13i2.1416
Prieto, L. M., Aguero-Valverde, J., Flacke, J., Van, M., & Maarseveen. (2023). Evaluating school priorities for equal opportunity in admission to schools. Journal of School Choice, 17(3), 404–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2022.2129334
Ratnawati, T., & Iljas, N. (2021). Twitting the public sentiment on the Jakarta online zoning system. Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, 5(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v5i1.49718
Rohde, L. A., Campani, F., Oliveira, J. R. G., Rohde, C. W., Rocha, T., & Ramal, A. (2019). Parental reasons for school choice in elementary school: A systematic review. Journal of School Choice, 13(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2019.1643970
Sattin-Bajaj, C. (2014). Two roads diverged: exploring variation in students’ school choice experiences by socioeconomic status, parental nativity, and ethnicity. Journal of School Choice, 8(3), 410–445. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2014.942174
Thoha, M., & Gazali, H. A. (2020). Dampak penerapan sistem zonasi dalam penerimaan peserta didik baru terhadap lembaga pendidikan Islam di Madura [The impact of implementing the zoning system in the admission of new students on Islamic educational institutions in Madura]. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 15(1), 141–154. http://ejournal.iainmadura.ac.id/index.php/tadris/article/view/3302
Tripujianti, S., Purnamasari, H., & Azizah, A. N. (2021). Persepsi peserta didik terhadap kebijakan penerimaan peserta didik baru (PPDB) Provinsi DKI Jakarta sistem zonasi dengan seleksi usia di sekolah menengah atas (SMA) tahun 2020 [Students' perceptions of the policy for new student admissions (PPDB) in DKI Jakarta Province, using the zoning system with age selection for senior high schools (SMA) in 2020]. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, 6(3), 115–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v6i3.1778
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional [Law No. 20/2003 on the National Education System].(2003). https://jdih.setkab.go.id/PUUdoc/7308/UU0202003.htm
Zaelani, M. (2019, June 25). Revolusi senyap pendidikan [silent revolution in education]. SOLOPOS, 4.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.