Email this article Effect of Blended Learning on Students Learning Outcomes A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Abstract Effect of Blended Learning on Students Learning Outcomes A Meta-analysis. Objective This research aims to determine the effect of blended learning implementation in Indonesia between 2016-2020. Methods This is a meta-analysis study and 27 articles met the criteria analyzed by Revman 5.4. This study reported effect size of blended learning on learning outcomes consisting of subgroups of education levels (elementary school, junior high school, senior high school, vocational education, and college) and subgroups of learning outcomes (knowledge, thinking ability, and attitude). Findings The theoretical effect size score of Standard Mean Difference or SMD is equal to 1.01 (95 percent CI [0.802– 1.20). P less than 0.00001) for blended learning compared to conventional. Subgroup analysis obtained a high category effect size for Blended Learnings application according to the level of education and learning achievement. Except for the effect size for attitudes belongs to the moderate category. Conclusion This study concluded that Blended Learning positively affects knowledge mastery, thinking ability, motivation, and learning independence at all levels of education.
Keywords blended learning, learning outcomes, education level.
Abstrak Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Suatu Meta Analisis. Tujuan Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan blended learning di Indonesia antara tahun 2016–2020. Metode Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian meta-analisis dan 27 artikel telah memenuhi kriteria setelah dianalisis dengan menggunakan Revman 5.4. Dalam penelitian ini dilaporkan effect size dari blended learning terhadap hasil belajar yang terdiri atas subgroup jenjang pendidikan (SD, SMP, SMA, SMK dan Perguruan tinggi) dan subgroup hasil belajar (pengetahuan, kemampuan berpikir, dan sikap). Temuan Skor effect size teoritik standar mean difference atau SMD sama dengan 1.01 (95 percent CI [0.802 – 1.20). P kurang dari 0.00001) untuk blended learning dibandingkan dengan metode pembelajaran konvensional. Analisis subgrup diperoleh informasi bahwa effect size berkategori tinggi untuk penerapan blended learning sesuai jenjang pendidikan dan hasil belajar. Kecuali effect size untuk sikap masuk ke dalam kategori sedang. Kesimpulan Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Blended Learning memberi pengaruh positif terhadap penguasaan pengetahuah. kemampuan berpikir. motivasi dan kemandirian belajar di semua jenjang pendidikan.
Kata kunciblended learning, hasil belajar, tingkat pendidikan.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Samarraie, H., & Hurmuzan, S. (2018). A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002
Al-shami, S. A., Aziz, H., & Rashid, N. (2018). Retracted: The adoption of MOOC utilization among undergraduate students in Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTEM). Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10(6S), 2634-2654.
Akhmalia, N. L., Suana, W., & Maharta, N. (2018). Efektivitas Blended Learning Berbasis LMS dengan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada Materi Fluida Statis terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 2(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v2i2.299
Al-Shami, S. ., Aziz, H., & Rashid, N. (2018). Retracted : The adoption of MOOC utilization among undergraduate students in Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka ( UTEM ). 19, 19.
Anggraeni dkk. (2019). Pengaruh Blended Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(6), 758–763.
Atmacasoy, A., & Aksu, M. (2018). Blended learning at pre-service teacher education in Turkey: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2399–2422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9723-5
Awaludin, F., Abidin Arief, Z., & Lubis, M. (2018). S Trategi P Embaruan a Graria. PROSIDING SNTP, 2018, 13(10), 185–196.
Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2082–2098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
Ceylan, V. K., & Elitok Kesici, A. (2017). Effect of blended learning to academic achievement. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 308. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i1.4141
Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9379-4
Chew, E., Jones, N., & Turner, D. (2008). Critical review of the blended learning models based on Maslow’s and Vygotsky’s educational theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5169 LNCS, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85170-7_4
Dakhi, O., Jama, J., Irfan, D., Ambiyar, & Ishak. (2020). Blended Learning: a 21St Century Learning Model At College. International Journal of Multi Science, 1(2), 17–23.
Daulay, K. R. (2014). Perbedaan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Antara Model Blended Learning Berbasis Masalah Dan Konvensional Di Smp. 1–7.
Fisher, D. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Melalui Blended-Learning Dengan Strategi Probing-Prompting. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 2(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v2i2.603
Friesen, N. (2012). Defining Blended Learning. Learning Spaces, August, 10. http://learningspaces.org/papers/Defining_Blended_Learning_NF.pdf
Herlandy, P. B., & Novalia, M. (2019). Penerapan e-Learning pada pembelajaran komunikasi dalam jaringan dengan metode blended learning bagi siswa SMK. Journal of Education Informatic Technology and Science, 1(1), 24–33. https://ejurnal.umri.ac.id/index.php/JeITS/article/view/1225
Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., Mirzaei, F., Tak, C. C., Wan Obeng, S. N., & Ching, T. Y. (2018). Teaching and Learning Theories Applied in Mathematics Classroom among Primary School Teachers. Proceedings - 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum, WEEF 2017- In Conjunction with: 7th Regional Conference on Engineering Education and Research in Higher Education 2017, RCEE and RHEd 2017, 1st International STEAM Education Conference, STEAMEC 201, October 2018, 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467070
Klentien, U., & Wannasawade, W. (2016). Development of Blended Learning Model with Virtual Science Laboratory for Secondary Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.126
Krasnova, T. (2015). A Paradigm Shift: Blended Learning Integration in Russian Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.543
Laurillard, D. (2015). Thinking about Blended Learning. A paper for the Thinkers in Residence programme. Higher Education in the Digital Era: A Thinking Exercise in Flanders, December, 7–33. https://www.ethicalforum.be/sites/default/files/DP_BlendedLearning_Thinking-about_0.pdf
Lestari, H. (2020). Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Dengan Blog. NATURALISTIC : Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2b), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v4i2b.769
Mahariyanti, E. dan S. H. (2020). Efektivitas Penggunaan Blended Learning dengan Platform Quipper School terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas XI MIPA di SMAN 2 Selong. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Https://Jurnal.Unibrah.Ac.Id/Index.Php/JIWP, 6(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4314057
Mamahit, C. E. J. (2021). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Model Bauran Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dan Persepsi Mahasiswa [the Effect of the Blended Learning Model on Student Learning Outcomes and Perceptions]. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 17(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v17i1.2792
Manggabarani, A. F., Sugiarti, & Masri, M. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Pitumpanua Kab.Wajo (Studi Pada Materi Pokok Sistem Periodik Unsur). Jurnal Chemica, 17(2), 83–93.
Maryam, I. (2018). Pengaruh Blended Learning Berbantuan Microsoft Mathematic Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 4(2), 23–34. http://ejournal.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/surya/article/view/5340
Maskar, S., Dewi, P. S., & Puspaningtyas, N. D. (2020). Online Learning & Blended Learning: Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Metode Daring Penuh dan Terpadu. Prisma, 9(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v9i2.1070
Murray, J., Campbell, A., Hextall, I., Hulme, M., Jones, M., Mahony, P., Menter, I., Procter, R., & Wall, K. (2009). Research and teacher education in the UK: Building capacity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.011
Mustapa, M. A. S., Ibrahim, M., & Yusoff, A. (2015). Engaging Vocational College Students through Blended Learning: Improving Class Attendance and Participation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.125
Mutaqin, A., Marethi, I., & Syamsuri. (2016). Model Blended Learning di Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika UNITIRTA. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 134–141.
Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2020). Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.5137
Nirmala, S. P., & Dodik, A. D. (2020). STUDI LITERATUR MODEL BLENDED LEARNING PADA BERBAGAI E-LEARNING DALAM MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN VOKASI / KEJURUAN Nirmala Shafira Pratama Dodik Arwin Dermawan. Jurnal It-Edu, 05(01), 182–194.
Nugraha, S. A., Sudiatmi, T., & Suswandari, M. (2020). Studi Pengaruh Daring Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Kelas IV. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(3), 265–276.
Olsson, T., Jarusriboonchai, P., Woźniak, P., Paasovaara, S., Väänänen, K., & Lucero, A. (2020). Technologies for Enhancing Collocated Social Interaction: Review of Design Solutions and Approaches. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, 29(1–2), 29–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09345-0
Patrick, S., & Sturgis, C. (2015). Maximizing Competency Education and Blended Learning « Competency Works. Internationaal Association for K-12 Online Learning, March, 1–47. http://www.competencyworks.org/resources/stripping-off-the-ceiling-of-the-education-system-with-blended-learning/%5Cnhttp://www.competencyworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/CompetencyWorks-Maximizing-Competency-Education-and-Blended-Learning.pdf
Pitaloka, E. D., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Keefektifan Blended - Problem Based Learning terhadap Pemecahan Masalah pada Materi Ekologi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(5), 640–647. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/12430
Putri, A. K., & Bukit, N. (2020). EFEK PEMBELAJARAN BLENDED LEARNING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA SMA NEGERI 1 PANGKALAN SUSU. Jurnal Ikatan Alumni Fisika Universitas Negeri Medan, 6(2), 30–35.
Ramdhani, T., Suharta, I. G. P., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Hybrid Learning Berbantuan Schoology Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Xi Sman 2 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha, 11(2), 2613–9677. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPM/article/view/24967
Rao, S. V. D. N., & U, S. (2014). The Macrotheme Review entities. The Macrotheme Review, 3(1), 40–53.
Riantika, R. F. P., & Mukminan. (2019). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Geografi pada Materi Litosfer Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(2), 1723–1729.
Sari, D. P. S., Nurdiana, A., & Noviyana, H. (2019). PENGARUH MODEL BLENDED LEARNING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SEMESTER GENAP SMP Dewi. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung.
Septiyan, I., Anriani, N., & Hendrayana, A. (2020). Perbandingan Model Discovery Learning dan Blended Learning terhadap Pencapaian Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. 4(2), 359–374.
Setiawan, A., Putra, D. R., Sujalwo, S., & Cahyo, A. N. (2020). Development of Moodle-based Learning Media using Blended Learning Methods in Graphic Design Subject. IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), 8(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2019.08201
Simarmata, J. (2017). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning. 11(March), 1–5.
Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Sadra, I. W. (2016). Pengaruh Model Blended Learning Berbantuan Video Animasi Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 49(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppundiksha.v49i2.9009
Tsai, A. C., Chuang, S., Liang, J., Tsai, M., Journal, S., Learning, A., Tsai, C., Chuang, S., Liang, J., & Tsai, M. (2018). International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Self-efficacy in Internet-based Learning Environments : A Literature Review Published by : International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Self-efficacy in Internet-based Learning Environment. Source: Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 222–240.
Tsaniyah, S. F., Ayu, H. D., & Pratiwi, H. Y. (2019). Pengaruh model blended learning menggunakan schoology terhadap prestasi belajar ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar siswa. Terapan Sains & Teknologi, 1(1), 71–77.
Umiyati, M. (2020). Meningkatkan Pencapaian Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Corpus Linguistik Melalui Penerapan Blended Learning. Unika Atma Jaya, September, 16–18.
van de Oudeweetering, K., & Voogt, J. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization and enactment of twenty-first century competences: exploring dimensions for new curricula. Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369136
Wahyuni, R., & Nurhayati, N. (2019). Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Blended Learning Pada Mata Kuliah Matematika Ekonomi. Al-Qalasadi : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.32505/v3i2.1367
Wahyuni, S. (2018). The Effect of Blended Learning Model towards Students’ Writing Ability Sri. Journal of English for Academic, 5(2), 97–111.
Wong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness. Education and Training, 56(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049
Yanti, F. N., Sugiharta, I., & Farida, F. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Blended Learning Menggunakan Edmodo. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i2.4035
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.