Email this article EFEKTIVITAS LKPD SAINS BERORIENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DALAM MENUMBUHKAN KECAKAPAN BERPIKIR KREATIF
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the impact of the use of Worksheet Students (LKPD) oriented model of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on the Science topicsabout Sense of Hearing and Sonar Systems in Human Beings. The data collection is done with quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental design with Nonequivalent pre-test post test. A total of 74 students of a junior high school in the city of Bandar Lampung involved as research samples. Samples were divided into two groups: an experimental group where students acquire learning using LKPD-based treatment and control groups use traditional PBL LKPD in students books. The results showed that LKPD based on PBL effective in use for science topics of Sense of Hearing and Sonar Systems in Beings with high levels of effectiveness (N-Gain = 0.78).
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dampak penggunaan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) berorientasi model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (PBL) materi sains SMP Topik Indera Pendengaran dan Sistem Sonar pada Makhluk Hidup. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif menggunakan metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain Non equivalent pre-test post-test. Sebanyak 74 orang siswa sebuah SMP di kota Bandar Lampung terlibat sebagai sampel penelitian. Sampel terbagi atas dua kelompok, yaitu kelompok eksperimen dimana siswa memperoleh perlakuan pembelajaran menggunakan LKPD berbasis PBL dan kelompok kontrol mengggunakan LKPD yang ada di buku siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa LKPD yang berbasis PBL efektif digunakan pembelajaran sains topik Indera Pendengaran dan Sistem Sonar pada Makhluk Hidup dengan tingkat keefektifan tinggi (N-Gain =0,78).
Kata kunci : LKPD, PBL, berpikir kreatif, indera pendengaran dan sistem sonar pada
makhluk hidup
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aktamis, H., & Ergin, O. 2008. The Effect on Scientific Process Skills Education on Students Scientific Creativity, Science Attitudes And Academic Achievements. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol. 9, Issue 1.
Arends, R.I., & Kilcher, A. 2010. Teaching for student learning becoming an accomplished teacher. N .York: Routledge
Arnyana, I. B. P. 2006. Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Pada Pelajaran Biologi Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran IKIP Negeri Singaraja. No. 3, Tahun XXXIX (496-515).
Baer, J. 1993. Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task Specific Approach. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
Bembenutty, H., Cleary, T., & Kitsantas, A. 2013. Applications of self regulatedlearning applied across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Breakspear, S. 2012. The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmarking in School System Performance. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71. OECD Publishing (NJ1).
Chin & Chia. 2006. Problem-Based Learning: Using Ill-Structured Problems in Biology Project Work. Science Education, 90: 44-67.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. 2012. Strategi dan model pembelajaran mengajar konten dan keterampilan berpikir. (Terjemahan Satrio Wahono). Boston: Pearson Educational, Inc. (Buku asli diterbitkan pada 2012)
Eldy, E.F.,& Sulaiman, F. 2013. The Role of PBL in Improving Physics Students Creative Thinking And Its Imprint on Gender. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(6), 1-11.
Galbreath, J. 1999. Preparing the 21st Century Worker: The Link Between Computer-Based Technology and Future Skill Sets. Educational Technology. Desember: 14-22.
Hake, R. 1999. Analyzing Charge Gain Scores. Tersedia di http://lists.asu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9903&L=aera-d&p=R6855 [diakses 26-05-2015].
Hung, W. 2011. Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 529552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423 011-9198-1
Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R. 2008. Problem-based learning. In J. M. Spector, J. G. Van Merrinboer, M. D., Merrill, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 485-506). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, E. B. 2002. Contextual Teaching and Learning. California: Corwin Press, Inc.
Krulik, S. and Rudnik, J. A. 1996. The New Source Book Teaching Reasoning and Problem Solving in Junior and Senior High School. Massachusets: Allyn & Bacon.
Liliasari. 2005. Membangun keterampilan berpikir manusia Indonesia melalui pendidikan sains. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap dalam Ilmu Pendidikan IPA. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. 2012. TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F, Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. 1988. Dimensions of thinking: a framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McFarlane, D. A. 2013. Understanding the challenges of science education in the 21st century: new opportunities for scientific literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, (04), 35-44.
NRC. 1996. National Science Standards. Washington DC. National Press.
Tinio, V.L. 2003. ICT in Education. Diakses melalui http://www.apdip.net/publications/iespprimers/ICTinEducation.pdf pada 16 Juni 2011.
Nyamupangedengu, E., & Lelliott, A. 2012. An exploration of learners use of worksheets during a science museum visit. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 82-99.
Parkins, D.N. 1995. What Creative Thinking Is. Costa, A.L. (Ed). Developing Minds A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. (hlm. 58-61) Alexandra, Virginia: Assosiation for Supervisions and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Rasku-Puttonen, H., Etelapelto, A., Arvaja, M., & Hakkinen, P. 2003. Is successful scaffolding an illusion? Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a long-term learning project. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(6), 377393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025700810376
Reiser, B. J., Berland, L. K., & Kenyon, L. 2012. Engaging students in the scientific practices of explanation and argumentation. Science Scope, 35(8), 6-11.
Semerci, Nuriye. 2006. The Effect of Problem Based Learning on The Critical Thinking of Students in The Intellectual and Ethical Development Unit. (Online), http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3852/is200601/ai_n17187271/?tag=mantleskin;diakses pada 24 Januari 2016)
Simak, E. Y. F. 2012. Pengaruh Model Quantum Teaching Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep IPA dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 2(1).
Stacey, K. 2010. Mathematical and scientific literacy around the world. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(1), 1-16.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Trilling, B. and Paul Hood. 1999. Learning, Technology, and Education Reform in the Knowledge Age. Educational Technology. Juni-Mei: 5-18.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.