Integration of Digital Technologies in Physics Experiments: A Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
Abstract: Digital technology plays an important role in physics experiments by increasing the accuracy of data collection, enabling complex simulations and conducting real-time analysis, which accelerates scientific discovery, and improve test accuracy. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the conduct of research on the integration of digital technologies into physics experiments. This study conduct a bibliometric analysis of the integration of digital technology into physics experiments from January 2014 to May 2024. Based on the keywords, only articles selected by SCOPUS in English were included, and using the PRISMA guidelines we obtained 344 articles for analysis. In this studies, sample articles from SCOPUS in *RIS formats are processed using the VOSviewer to facilitate visualization and trend detection. Our analysis revealed seven prominent trends, included e-learning, digital twin, numerical model, high energy physics, application specific integrate, analog electronic circuit, and tracking detectors. The inspection results show that there was no significant development, research on the integration of digital technology into physics experiments has not been seriously conducted from the point of view of future teachers and teacher education, and only a few countries have investigated it. Therefore, based on the results of this bibliometric analysis, it provides an overview and opportunities for further research.
Keywords: bibliometric, digital technology, physics experiments, VOSviewer.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp659-670
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014
Abu Talib, M., Bettayeb, A. M., & Omer, R. I. (2021). Analytical study on the impact of technology in higher education during the age of COVID-19: Systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6719–6746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10507-1
Angelito, C. J., & Angeline, P. (2023). Jurnal pendidikan progresif teachers ’ experiences in flipped classroom in south-east asian. 13(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v13.i2.20230
Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun - Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88(5), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10141
Caliskan, S., Korzhuev, A. V., Ikrennikova, Y. B., Efimushkina, S. V., Karavanova, L. Z., & Masalimova, A. R. (2021). Computer’s place in teaching and learning for university students in the web of science database. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(19), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i19.26057
Carlsen, A., Holmberg, C., Neghina, C., & Owusu-Boampong, A. (2022). Closing the Gap | Closing The Gap (Issue February). https://ctgreport.niaa.gov.au/
Chen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers and Education, 59(2), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.001
Chen, C., Song, I. Y., Yuan, X., & Zhang, J. (2008). The thematic and citation landscape of Data and Knowledge Engineering (1985-2007). Data and Knowledge Engineering, 67(2), 234–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2008.05.004
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Past, present, and future of smart learning: a topic-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6
Cowling, M. A., Crawford, J., Vallis, C., Middleton, R., & Sim, K. N. (2022). The EdTech difference: Digitalisation, digital pedagogy, and technology enhanced learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 19(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.2.1
Djankov, S., Saliola, F., Chen, R., Connon, D., Cusolito, A., Gentilini, U., Islam, A., Sabarwal, S., Santos, I., & Y., Z. (2018). The changing nature of work, Washington. In NASPA Journal (Vol. 42, Issue 4).
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(April), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022). A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x
Goerlandt, F., Li, J., & Reniers, G. (2021). Virtual special issue: mapping safety science – reviewing safety research. Safety Science, 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105278
Jardinez, M. J., & Natividad, L. R. (2024). The the advantages and challenges of inclusive education: striving for equity in the classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 12(2), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v12i2.7182
Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. G., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction. Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction, 1–310. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647500
K. Zervoudi, E. (2020). Fourth industrial revolution: opportunities, challenges, and proposed policies. Industrial Robotics - New Paradigms, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90412
Kanna, S., Von Rosenberg, W., Goverdovsky, V., Constantinides, A. G., & Mandic, D. P. (2018). Bringing wearable sensors into the classroom: a participatory approach [SP Education]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2806418
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2018). Can microsoft academic help to assess the citation impact of academic books? Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 972–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.08.003
Matthews, L. C. and B. T. A. (2018). The impact of globalization on Africa. Handbook of Africa’s International Relations, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803929-5
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Grp, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (reprinted from annals of internal medicine). Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Novia, N., Permanasari, A., & Riandi, R. (2021). Research on educational games in STEM area 2010-2020: A bibliometric analysis of literature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012209
Pournader, M., Ghaderi, H., Hassanzadegan, A., & Fahimnia, B. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 241(August), 108250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108250
Rehman, Z. ur. (2023). Trends and challenges of technology-enhanced learning in geotechnical engineering education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107972
Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 28, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5
Salmi, H., Thuneberg, H., & Vainikainen, M. P. (2017). Making the invisible observable by Augmented Reality in informal science education context. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 7(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1254358
Sarı, T., & Aypay, A. (2024). A Bibliometric Study of Issues in Educational Policy. Education Sciences, 14(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060568
Snowie Y. Balansag, Lexter R. Natividad, and E. V. E. (2018). Environmental and social impacts of road improvement project: basis for sustainable environmental management. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8969663
Staddon, R. V. (2023). Exploring higher education students’ perspectives on factors affecting use, attitudes and confidence with learning technologies. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1623a
Strozzi, F., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Noè, C. (2017). Literature review on the ‘smart factory’ concept using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1326643
Trí, N. M., Hoàng, P. D., & Dũng, N. T. (2021). Impact of the industrial revolution 4.0 on higher education in vietnam: challenges and opportunities. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Verde, A., & Valero, J. M. (2021). Teaching and learning modalities in higher education during the pandemic: responses to coronavirus disease 2019 from Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(August), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648592
Wahyudi, I., Suyanto, E., & Maulina, H. (2019). Jurnal pembelajaran fisika (JPF)-Pendidikan Fisika. Fkip, 7(2), 77–85. http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/
Yang, F., & Gu, S. (2021). Industry 4.0, a revolution that requires technology and national strategies. Complex and Intelligent Systems, 7(3), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00267-9
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.