A Systematic Review on Interdisciplinary STEM: Integration of Humanities, Arts, and Social Scientific Issues in Science Learning
Abstract
Abstract: The aim is to understand the application and impact of STEM Humanities in science education as an implementation reference. This review systematically explores papers published between 2018-2022 through keyword searches and a snowballing approach on the Scopus database; 16 journal papers were included. The analysis shows that Implementation of Interdisciplinary STEM (STEM Humanities), Interdisciplinary Potential of STEM (Students’ perceptions of the relationship between science and non-science), Impact of Interdisciplinary STEM (STEM Humanities). The collective findings of 16 papers show that STEM interdisciplinarity opportunities to combine learning between science and non-science. Allows students to understand problems that exist in the real world. By grasping real-world issues, students can enhance their problem-solving skills, aligning with the demands of the 21st century. Moreover, interdisciplinary STEM ensures that students with disabilities and people of colour feel comfortable in their learning environment, preventing discrimination against students from diverse backgrounds.
Keywords: interdisciplinary stem; stem humanities; problem-solving
Abstrak: Artikel ini mengeksplorasi temuan terkait interdisipliner STEM dengan fokus integrasi Humaniora, Seni, dan Sosial Sains (STEM Humanistik). Tujuannya adalah untuk memahami penerapan dan dampak Humanistik STEAM dalam pendidikan sains sebagai referensi implementasi. Tinjauan ini secara sistematis mengeksplorasi makalah yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2018 dan 2022 melalui pencarian kata kunci dan pendekatan snowballing pada database Scopus; 16 makalah jurnal dimasukkan dalam ulasan ini. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa Implementasi Interdisipliner STEM (STEM Humanistik) Potensi Interdisipliner STEM (Persepsi siswa pada hubungan antara sains dan non sains) Dampak Interdisipliner STEM (STEM Humanistik). Temuan kolektif dari 16 makalah menunjukkan bahwa interdisipliner STEM membuka peluang untuk menggabungkan pembelajaran antara sains dengan non sains. Hal tersebut, dapat membuat peserta didik memahami masalah yang ada di dunia nyata. Dengan memahami masalah dunia nyata, peserta didik dapat meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah yang sesuai dengan keterampilan tuntutan abad 21. Selain itu, interdisipliner STEM memberikan kenyamanan peserta didik disabilitas dan kulit berwarna dalam belajar sehingga tidak terdapat deskriminasi pada siswa dengan latar belakang yang berbeda.
Kata kunci: kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis, means-ends analysis, pendekatan realistik, kemandirian belajar siswa
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alam, A. (2021). Possibilities and Apprehensions in the Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICA52458.2021.9697272
Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
Borda, E., Schumacher, E., Hanley, D., Geary, E., Warren, S., Ipsen, C., & Stredicke, L. (2020). Initial implementation of active learning strategies in large, lecture STEM courses: lessons learned from a multi-institutional, interdisciplinary STEM faculty development program. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0203-2
Brunetti, F., Matt, D. T., Bonfanti, A., De Longhi, A., Pedrini, G., & Orzes, G. (2020). Digital transformation challenges: strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. TQM Journal, 32(4), 697–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0309
Chang, D. F., & ChangTzeng, H. C. (2020). Patterns of gender parity in the humanities and STEM programs: the trajectory under the expanded higher education system. Studies in Higher Education, 45(6), 1108–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1550479
Cheng, Y.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Huang, Y.-L., Buckner, C. A., Lafrenie, R. M., Dénommée, J. A., Caswell, J. M., Want, D. A., Gan, G. G., Leong, Y. C., Bee, P. C., Chin, E., Teh, A. K. H., Picco, S., Villegas, L., Tonelli, F., Merlo, M., Rigau, J., Diaz, D., … Mathijssen, R. H. J. (2016). We are IntechOpen , the world ’ s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists , for scientists TOP 1 %. Intech, 11(tourism), 13. https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-biometric-technologies/liveness-detection-in-biometrics
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Faulconer, E. K., Wood, B., & Griffith, J. C. (2020). Infusing Humanities in STEM Education: Student Opinions of Disciplinary Connections in an Introductory Chemistry Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09819-7
Herrenkohl, L. R., Lee, J., Kong, F., Nakamura, S., Imani, K., Nasu, K., Hartman, A., Pennant, B., Tran, E., Wang, E., Eslami, N. P., Whittlesey, D., Whittlesey, D., Huynh, T. M., Jung, A., Batalon, C., Bell, A., & Headrick Taylor, K. (2019). Learning in Community for STEM Undergraduates: Connecting a Learning Sciences and a Learning Humanities Approach in Higher Education. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624549
Herro, D., Quigley, C., & Cian, H. (2019). The Challenges of STEAM Instruction: Lessons from the Field. Action in Teacher Education, 41(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1551159
Hynes, W., Trump, B., Love, P., & Linkov, I. (2020). Bouncing forward: a resilience approach to dealing with COVID-19 and future systemic shocks. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09776-x
Lee, A. (2022). A Forgotten Underrepresented Group: Students with Disabilities’ Entrance into STEM Fields. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(4), 1295–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1767762
Leyva, L. A., McNeill, R. T., Balmer, B. R., Marshall, B. L., King, V. E., & Alley, Z. D. (2022). Black Queer Students’ Counter-Stories of Invisibility in Undergraduate STEM as a White, Cisheteropatriarchal Space. American Educational Research Journal, 59(5), 863–904. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221096455
Macalalag, A. Z., Johnson, J., & Lai, M. (2020). How do we do this: learning how to teach socioscientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09944-9
Marcone, G. (2022). Humanities and Social Sciences in Relation to Sustainable Development Goals and STEM Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063279
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Melton, J. W., Ali Saiful, J., & Pat Shein, P. (2022). Interdisciplinary STEM program on authentic aerosol science research and students’ systems thinking approach in problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 44(9), 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2080886
Mukaromah, L., Mustadi, A., & Nisa, A. (2022). Study of STEM Based on Local Wisdom in Hoening Science Process Skills in the 21st Century Era. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1168–1174. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1445
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Baker, A. (2019). Moving Toward Transdisciplinary Instruction: A Longitudinal Examination of STEAM Teaching Practices. STEAM Education: Theory and Practice, 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_8
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., King, E., & Plank, H. (2020). STEAM Designed and Enacted: Understanding the Process of Design and Implementation of STEAM Curriculum in an Elementary School. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09832-w
Reynante, B. M., Selbach-Allen, M. E., & Pimentel, D. R. (2020). Exploring the Promises and Perils of Integrated STEM Through Disciplinary Practices and Epistemologies. Science and Education, 29(4), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00121-x
Roothooft, H. (2022). Spanish lecturers’ beliefs about English medium instruction: STEM versus Humanities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1707768
Shifrer, D., & Mackin Freeman, D. (2021). Problematizing Perceptions of STEM Potential: Differences by Cognitive Disability Status in High School and Postsecondary Educational Outcomes. Socius, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023121998116
Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Essay Analysis of Performing Arts Education Students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.38
Tabarés, R., & Boni, A. (2022). Maker culture and its potential for STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, December 2021, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09725-y
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review* Introduction: the need for an evidence- informed approach. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
Tsang, T. L. (2019). A quantitative analysis examining differences between US humanities and STEM students’ propensity toward innovation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1357069
Tsinajinie, G., Kirboyun, S., & Hong, S. (2021). An Outdoor Project-Based Learning Program: Strategic Support and the Roles of Students with Visual Impairments Interested in STEM. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09874-0
Yamada, A. (2021). Japanese Higher Education. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 13(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v13i1.1980
Yang, W. (2022). Artificial Intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(February), 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061
Zayyinah, Z., Erman, E., Supardi, Z. A. I., Hariyono, E., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). STEAM-Integrated Project Based Learning Models: Alternative to Improve 21st Century Skills. Proceedings of the Eighth Southeast Asia Design Research (SEA-DR) & the Second Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture, and Humanity (STEACH) International Conference (SEADR-STEACH 2021), 627, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211229.039
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.