High School Mathematics Teachers Ability in Developing Mathematical Literacy Instrument A Study in East Lampung Regency
Abstract
Abstract: High School Mathematics Teachers Ability in in Developing Instruments of Mathematical Literacy Test Study in Lampung Timur Regency. This study aims to describe the ability of high school mathematics teachers in East Lampung Regency in developing instruments of mathematical literacy test. This research is a descriptive study with 19 respondents of high school mathematics teachers. The research data were obtained through test, performance test and questionnaires. Data analyzed using data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The results showed that a) 63.16 percent teachers only able to create routine problem which measure employing stage in mathematical process, b) male teachers with more than 25 years teaching experience are only able to develop 5.26 percent mathematical problems which measure formulating stage, c) Reasoning and argument is the fundamental mathematics skills that was rarely measured in the developed instrument, d) using symbolic, formal and technical language and operations is the most frequently skills that is measured in the developed instrument.
Keywords: mathematical literacy instrument, high school teacher, descriptive research.
Abstrak: Kemampuan Guru Matematika SMA Kabupaten Lampung Timur dalam Mengembangkan Instrumen Tes Literasi Matematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan guru Matematika SMA Kabupaten Lampung Timur dalam mengembangkan instrumen tes literasi matematis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan responden sebanyak 19 orang guru matematika SMA. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui instrument tes, tes unjuk kerja serta angket. Data dianalisis dengan tahapan reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa a) 63,16 persen soal yang dibuat oleh guru adalah soal rutin pada tahapan proses matematis employ, b) Guru laki-laki dengan pengalaman mengajar lebih dari 25 tahun hanya mampu mengembangkan 5,26 persen soal matematika dengan proses matematis formulate c) Kemampuan dasar matematis yang paling minim dimunculkan pada soal yang dikembangkan oleh guru adalah penalaran dan argumentasi d) penggunaan operasi dan bahasa simbolik, formal dan teknis adalah kemampuan yang paling sering diukur oleh guru pada instrument yang dikembangkan.
Kata kunci: instrumen literasi matematis, guru SMA, penelitian deskriptif.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Budiono, B. 2016. Analisis Instrumen Asesmen Berbasis Literasi Matematika di SMP. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 542-549.
D Ahmad, S Suherman, H Maulana. 2018. Teacher Mathematical Literacy: Case Study of Junior High School Teachers in Pasaman. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering Volume 335 (Online) Available on: (https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012109)
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2005. Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Eliyanto dan Udik Budi Wibowo. 2013. Pengaruh Jenjang Pendidikan, Pelatihan dan Pengalaman Mengajar terhadap Profesionaliseme Guru SMA Muhammadiyah di Kabupaten Kebumen. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 1 (1): 34-47.
Juhaevah, Fahruh. 2017. Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP dalam Mememecah-kan Masalah Matematika Standar PISA ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 5 (2): 221-236.
Kemendikbud. 2014. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 59 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas/ Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kemendikbud. 2019. Hasil Ujian Nasional Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019.(Online), (https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/#2019!sma!daya_serap!99&99&999!a&03&T&T&1&!1!& )Diakses 23 Januari 2020.
Lastuti, Florentina Alma O, Regina Merry Maharani, dan Hanik Sri Pratini. 2018. Analisis Kemam-puan Literasi Matematika Kelas VIII Menurut Gender. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Etnomatnesia.
Nizar, Putri, Zulkardi. (2018). Developing PISA-Like Mathematics Problem Using the 2018 Asian Games Football and Table Tennis Context. Journal on Mathematics Education (Indo MSJME), 9(2): 183-194.
Nur, Andi Saparuddin dan Markus Palobo. 2018. Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif dan Gender. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9 (2): 139-148.
OECD. 2013. PISA 2015 Draft Mathematics Framework. Paris: OECD Publisher.
OECD. 2014. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2013). PISA: OECD Publishing.
OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Result in Focus. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 Results Combined Executive Summaries Volume I,II & III. PISA: OECD Publishing.
Ojose, B. 2012. Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able To Put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everyday Use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4 (1): 89-100.
Pulungan, Delyanti Azzumarito. 2014. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 3 (2): 74-78.
Sari, Rosalia H.N. (2015). Literasi Matematika: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana?. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2015. Halaman 713-720. ISBN. 978-602-73403-0-5.
Umbara, Uba dan Didi Suryadi. 2019. Re-Interpretation of Mathematical Literacy Based on the Teacher’s Perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 12 (4): 789-806.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.