PRAKTIKUM EKOLOGI BERBASIS PROYEK: MEDIA PEMBEKALAN KETERAMPILAN ESENSIAL LABORATORIUM
Abstract
Up to now in learning ecology, especially its practical work, many people still use the guidebook of the practical work, such as recipe which is not optimal in developing the essential skill of laboratory. As a result, the students’ [the candidate of the biology teacher]mastery of the laboratory essential skill is still low. Actually, the practical work of ecology is very interesting because it be carried out in the open air nature. However, this nature laboratory has not yet exploited very well in the activity of ecology practical work. In addition, the conduct of this practical work has not yet been the science project basis in the condition of eco-biological local area.Ecology has the activity aspects of exploration, experiment, and observation. Based on the three aspects, the ecology practical work should be project basis where practical work students themselves make the design outline of the practical work which they will conduct. In addition, They also solve the problem and produce the products. The students can conduct the research by collecting, organizing, analyzing data and writing the report of their research. The project evaluation should be carried out for preparation, implementation, and result. Therefore, through the practical work of ecology, the indicators of the laboratory essential skills should be well-formulated on every practical work topic which is conducted. These skills are the basic ones as the pre-requirement of the further skill development, such as some procedures, processes and method which scientist uses when s/he constructs the knowledge and solve problem in scientific work.
Keyword : practice, ecology, project, laboratory essential skills
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anggraeni, S. (2001). Analisis Pembelajaran Biologi Molekuler di SMU Kodya Bandung. Makalah Penelitian. Bandung: FMIPA UPI.
D’Avanzo C. (2003). Research on Learning: Potential for Improving College Ecology Teaching. Front Ecol Environment. 1(10):533-540.
Ford, E. D. (2000). Scientific Method for Ecological Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibb, J. (2002). The Collection of Research Reading on Generic Skill in VET [online]. Tersedia: http://www.ncvr.edu.au.hotm. [ 17 Nopember 2008].
Haigh, M., (1996). Investigating Investigatorrs: Implications for Teachesrs of theIntroduction of Open Investigations Into Form 6 (Year 12) Biology Practical Work. Paper accompanying presentation to 27th annual conference of The Australian Science Education Research Association, Canberra.
Henry, N. W. (1975). Objectives of Laboratory Work. In: The Structure of Science Education, Australia: Longman.
Moore, R. (2007). What Do Students’ Behaviors and Performances in Lab Tell Us About Their Behaviors and Performances in Lecture – Portions of Introductory Biology Courses? Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching. 33(1), 19-24.
Nur, M. (1996). Teori Pembelajaran IPA dan Hakekat Pendekatan Keteram-pilan Proses. Jakarta : Dikmenum.
Ottander, C, & Grelsson, G. (2006). Laboratory work: the teachers’ perspective. Journal of Biological Education. 40(3), 113-118.
Rustaman, N et al. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi UPI.
Rustaman N & Riyanto, A. (2003). Perencanaan dan Penilaian Prak-tikum di Perguruan Tinggi. Handout Program applied approach bagi Dosen baru Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 13-25 Januari 2003.
Semiawan, C. (1985). Pendekatan Ke-terampilan Proses. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.
Surya, M. (2003). Psikologi Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Bandumg: Pustaka Bani Buraisy.
Watson, R., Prieto, T., Dillon, S.J., (1995). The Effect of Practical Work on Students’ Understanding of Com-bustion. J. Research in Science Teaching. Vol 32, No. 5.
Wulan, A.R. (2003). Permasalahan yang Dihadapi dalam Pemberdayaan Praktikum Biologi di SMU dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. Tesis. Bandung: SPs UPI (tidak dipublikasika).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)