|  Post Reply

Remind me, what's an executive order?

Executive orders are directives purchased by the president of the United States that direct federal government companies and authorities to take specific actions. While they are not laws, they have the force of law and impact how existing laws are implemented or imposed.

Executive orders impact the agencies of the executive branch and therefore do not need the approval of Congress. They need to be within the president's constitutional authority and might be challenged in court if deemed unconstitutional.

Executive orders might be rescinded, overturned by future presidents, or challenged in court, and enforcement concerns can change throughout any administration.

The brand-new administration's actions have far-reaching results beyond executive orders. For more on mitigating danger, global services can take brand-new opportunities by remaining nimble.

Implications of the executive orders for DEI efforts and employment in private-sector companies

On Jan. 21, President Trump provided "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," which reverses various previous executive orders and memoranda, consisting of Executive Order 11246 (EO 11246) checked in 1965 by President Lyndon B. Johnson.

EO 11246 required every federal government contract to consist of a declaration that the contractor will not discriminate against any staff member or applicant for employment based on race, creed, employment color, or national origin.

Despite President Trump's brand-new executive order, the underlying federal anti-discrimination law remains unchanged for private-sector workers.

However, the executive order signals that there may be altering enforcement priorities in the brand-new administration. The order directs all federal firms to "combat unlawful private-sector DEI preferences, requireds, policies, programs, and activities."

In December 2024, President-elect Trump tapped Harmeet K. Dhillon to lead the Justice Department's civil rights workplace, indicating his record of "taking legal action against corporations who utilize 'woke' policies to victimize their employees."

In addition to withdrawing EO 11246, the Jan. 21 executive order advises each agency of the federal government to determine "approximately nine potential civic compliance investigations" of economic sector entities within 120 days of the order - by May 21, 2025.

The private sector entities subject to these investigations consist of publicly traded corporations, big nonprofits - including bar associations - large foundations, and universities whose endowments surpass US$ 1 billion.

Organizations that may be targeted should ask:

- What is my company's risk tolerance?

- How will staff members react to the company's actions?

- How will clients and stakeholders react?


What in-house counsel must believe about:

Assess any federal agreements and grants

- Determine if they consist of any terms or conditions related to DEI that may clash with current laws and regulations


Review your organization's existing DEI policies to understand your danger

- Prepare for increased scrutiny and prospective civil compliance investigations


Document, document, document

- Hiring and recruitment processes

- Performance evaluations and promo decisions

- Training products and participation records

- Any changes to DEI policies


Implications for federal contractors

To name a few measures, employment the Jan. 21 Executive Order requires the heads of federal firms to include specific terms in every contract or grant award:

- "A term requiring the legal counterparty or grant recipient to agree that its compliance in all aspects with all appropriate Federal anti-discrimination laws is product to the federal government's payment choices for purposes of section 3729( b)( 4) of title 31, United States Code"; and

- "A term needing such counterparty or recipient to license that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that breach any relevant Federal anti-discrimination laws."


Section 3729 of title 31 of the United States Code is an arrangement of the US False Claims Act, a federal law that enforces civil penalties on those who make false claims to the government in order to influence the payment or receipt of cash or property.

The certification requirement carries a potential danger of litigation for federal specialists under the False Claims Act. In-house lawyers at federal specialists therefore have a particular interest in guaranteeing their company's policies, treatments, practices, communications and content, are reviewed. Assess if modifications are required to reduce the risk of litigation.

Executive orders targeting prohibited migration

President Trump's initial flurry of executive orders consisted of many - such as the Jan. 20 executive order "Protecting the American People Against Invasion" - targeted at limiting prohibited migration and deporting illegal immigrants. The orders require enforcement actions by federal agencies against unlawful migration.

In-house lawyers must consider evaluating their company's employment eligibility confirmation process. They may likewise wish to think about whether the organization is gotten ready for reacting to an I-9 audit or a worksite enforcement action (or raid) by migration enforcement agencies.

Sectors that may be especially impacted include agriculture, hospitality, and other markets such as building. From 2020-2022, 42 percent of crop farmworkers held no work permission, according to the US Department of Agriculture. The American Immigration Council estimates that more than one million undocumented immigrants operate in hospitality, representing 7.1 percent of the labor force.

In-house counsel have a crucial role to play in establishing and making sure constant application of the Form I-9 and employment E-Verify guidelines the federal government uses to carry out and impose immigration law, shares John W. Mazzeo, AGC, director of I-9 and E-Verify compliance for Vertical Screen, Inc., in a 2024 ACC Docket article.

Take a look at helpful lists of factors to consider pertinent for in-house attorneys on the subject of I-9 audits and worksite enforcement actions.

If an employer does not comply with a civil administrative warrant provided by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), there is a threat that the company could start an I-9 audit if they felt a company was blocking their need to apprehend a non-citizen worker, or in many cases obtain a criminal warrant from a judge if actions support it.

Steps internal counsel ought to think about:

- Determine the number of employees could potentially be impacted

- Review your organization's employment eligibility confirmation procedure

- Ensure your organization's process is documented and defensible

- Implement and impose clear policies

- Monitor legal developments, including litigation and enforcement assistance


Mitigate risk, remain nimble, and take brand-new chances

The current executive orders will significantly impact worldwide businesses. Legal departments and internal counsel will need to assist their organizations understand and adjust to modifications, making sure compliance or litigating when suitable.

Much of the brand-new administration's choices will play out over the coming months, including new executive orders and legal obstacles. The Docket will continue to monitor developments. Global in-house lawyers ought to get ready for fast advancements related to:

Trade and tariffs. On Feb. 1, President Trump purchased the imposition of a 25-percent tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, and 10-percent extra tariffs on imports from China. The former 2 were both postponed by a month as the administration engages in settlements. Meanwhile, China has begun its own vindictive procedures on US products. He had previously announced his intent to impose 25-percent escalating tariffs on Colombia (an action that was ultimately not taken).


Technology and copyright. Among the president's first actions was to rescind the previous administration's AI executive order. The brand-new administration likewise extended a grace duration for TikTok's impending ban, sending out waves throughout the technology sector, employment both in the United States and abroad.


Energy, environment, employment and health. The president likewise withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization, putting an early focus on American energy self-reliance and away from the previous administration's worldwide sustainability efforts.


Steps internal counsel must think about:

- Assess the effect of prospective tariff increases on supply chain and organization connection.

- Assess the company's dependency on social media platforms, such as for marketing functions, and the prospective needs to backup social media data and properties in case their preferred platform ceases to be readily available.

- Consider how advancements in the new administration's method to ecological, sustainability and governance concerns might impact the organization's ESG strategy.


Disclaimer: The information in any resource in this website need to not be interpreted as legal advice or as a legal opinion on particular realities, and should not be thought about representing the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not intended as a conclusive declaration on the subject attended to. Rather, they are intended to serve as a tool offering useful guidance and referrals for employment the hectic in-house practitioner and other readers.

Add comment

INDEXING JOURNAL: