|  Post Reply

U.S. Foreign Policy


Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for major conversation of American foreign policy and international affairs. The publication has actually featured contributions from many prominent worldwide affairs specialists.

More Resources

- Feedback

- Institutional Subscriptions

- Gift a Membership

- About Us

- Events

- Issue Archive

- Advertise

- Audio Content

- Account Management

- FAQs


Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational functions in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger


Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.

Copy Link Copied.
Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai.
Copy

Gift Link Copied.
This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Check in.

Create Citation Copied.
Chicago MLA APSA APA.
Chicago Cite not available at the moment.
MLA Cite not available at the minute.
APSA Cite not available at the minute.
APA Cite not available at the moment

Download PDF.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.

Request Reprint.
Request reprint permissions here.

In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with a critical intelligence obstacle in its blossoming competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from The second world war could no longer provide enough intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. surveillance abilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This deficiency spurred an audacious moonshot initiative: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a few years, U-2 missions were delivering essential intelligence, capturing images of Soviet missile installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar juncture. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the worldwide order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must take benefit of its world-class private sector and sufficient capacity for development to outcompete its enemies. The U.S. intelligence community must harness the country's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The combination of artificial intelligence, particularly through large language designs, provides groundbreaking chances to improve intelligence operations and analysis, enabling the delivery of faster and more pertinent support to decisionmakers. This technological transformation features substantial disadvantages, however, particularly as foes make use of similar improvements to reveal and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to secure itself from enemies who might use the technology for ill, and first to use AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. nationwide security neighborhood, fulfilling the guarantee and managing the peril of AI will require deep technological and cultural changes and a willingness to alter the way agencies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while alleviating its intrinsic threats, ensuring that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a rapidly developing international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States should transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the nation intends to fairly and safely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's capacity to revolutionize the intelligence neighborhood depends on its capability to process and evaluate large quantities of information at extraordinary speeds. It can be challenging to examine big quantities of gathered data to create time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services might take advantage of AI systems' pattern recognition abilities to recognize and alert human analysts to prospective risks, such as rocket launches or military movements, or important international advancements that analysts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would make sure that crucial warnings are prompt, actionable, and pertinent, permitting more effective reactions to both rapidly emerging threats and emerging policy opportunities. Multimodal designs, which integrate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For example, using AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence could offer a detailed view of military movements, allowing quicker and more precise hazard assessments and possibly brand-new ways of delivering details to policymakers.

Intelligence experts can also unload repetitive and time-consuming jobs to machines to concentrate on the most satisfying work: generating initial and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's general insights and efficiency. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence agencies invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has paid off. The capabilities of language models have grown increasingly advanced and accurate-OpenAI's just recently launched o1 and o3 models showed significant progress in precision and thinking ability-and can be used to even more quickly equate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on greater amounts of non-English data could be efficient in discerning subtle differences in between dialects and understanding the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By relying on these tools, the intelligence community might concentrate on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be difficult to discover, frequently struggle to get through the clearance procedure, and take a very long time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language products available throughout the ideal agencies, U.S. intelligence services would be able to more quickly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to choose out the needles in the haystack that truly matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be ignored. Models can promptly sort through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and traditional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that analysts can then confirm and refine, ensuring the end products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might partner with an innovative AI assistant to work through analytical problems, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collective style, enhancing each iteration of their analyses and providing ended up intelligence quicker.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly got into a secret Iranian facility and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of documents and a further 55,000 files stored on CDs, consisting of images and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities placed immense pressure on intelligence experts to produce detailed evaluations of its material and whether it pointed to an ongoing effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these specialists several months-and numerous hours of labor-to equate each page, review it by hand for relevant content, and integrate that details into evaluations. With today's AI capabilities, the first two steps in that procedure might have been accomplished within days, maybe even hours, allowing experts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

One of the most fascinating applications is the method AI could change how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, allowing them to interact straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would permit users to ask specific concerns and get summed up, relevant details from countless reports with source citations, assisting them make informed choices rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI uses numerous advantages, it also presents significant brand-new risks, specifically as foes develop similar technologies. China's advancements in AI, particularly in computer vision and security, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian routine, it lacks privacy constraints and civil liberty defenses. That deficit makes it possible for large-scale data collection practices that have actually yielded information sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on vast quantities of individual and behavioral data that can then be utilized for various purposes, such as security and social control. The presence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software worldwide might supply China with all set access to bulk information, significantly bulk images that can be used to train facial acknowledgment designs, a specific issue in nations with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security neighborhood should think about how Chinese designs developed on such comprehensive data sets can give China a tactical advantage.

And it is not simply China. The proliferation of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly cost effective expenses. Many of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are using big language models to quickly produce and spread out false and destructive content or to carry out cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and king-wifi.win Russia will have every reward to share some of their AI advancements with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, thereby increasing the threat to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI designs will become appealing targets for enemies. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being critical national possessions that must be protected against adversaries seeking to compromise or control them. The intelligence community should invest in developing protected AI models and in establishing standards for "red teaming" and continuous assessment to secure against potential hazards. These groups can utilize AI to mimic attacks, uncovering possible weaknesses and developing methods to mitigate them. Proactive steps, consisting of cooperation with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be important.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wished away. Waiting too long for AI technologies to fully mature carries its own threats; U.S. intelligence capabilities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going full steam ahead in developing AI. To ensure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive cautions or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be an advantage for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence neighborhood requires to adapt and innovate. The intelligence services need to rapidly master the use of AI innovations and make AI a foundational component in their work. This is the only sure method to make sure that future U.S. presidents receive the very best possible intelligence assistance, remain ahead of their adversaries, and secure the United States' sensitive capabilities and operations. Implementing these changes will require a cultural shift within the intelligence community. Today, intelligence experts mainly build items from raw intelligence and information, with some support from existing AI models for voice and imagery analysis. Moving forward, intelligence authorities need to explore consisting of a hybrid approach, in line with existing laws, utilizing AI models trained on unclassified commercially available data and improved with categorized details. This amalgam of innovation and standard intelligence gathering could result in an AI entity providing instructions to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an integrated view of regular and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automatic voice translation.

To speed up the shift, intelligence leaders must champion the advantages of AI integration, stressing the improved abilities and effectiveness it provides. The cadre of newly selected chief AI officers has actually been developed in U.S. intelligence and defense to work as leads within their companies for promoting AI development and removing barriers to the technology's application. Pilot projects and early wins can build momentum and confidence in AI's abilities, encouraging broader adoption. These officers can take advantage of the know-how of national labs and other partners to evaluate and improve AI designs, ensuring their efficiency and security. To institutionalise change, leaders ought to produce other organizational rewards, consisting of promotions and training opportunities, to reward inventive techniques and those workers and systems that show effective usage of AI.

The White House has developed the policy needed for the usage of AI in national security agencies. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order regarding safe, safe and secure, and credible AI detailed the assistance required to fairly and securely utilize the innovation, and National Security Memorandum 25, provided in October 2024, is the nation's fundamental strategy for harnessing the power and handling the dangers of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will require to do its part. Appropriations are needed for departments and companies to produce the facilities required for development and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and evaluations, and continue to invest in evaluation abilities to guarantee that the United States is building dependable and high-performing AI technologies.

Intelligence and military neighborhoods are dedicated to keeping humans at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have actually created the structures and tools to do so. Agencies will need guidelines for how their analysts need to use AI models to make certain that intelligence products meet the intelligence neighborhood's standards for reliability. The government will likewise require to maintain clear assistance for managing the information of U.S. people when it pertains to the training and use of large language models. It will be essential to stabilize using emerging innovations with safeguarding the privacy and civil liberties of people. This indicates augmenting oversight systems, updating relevant frameworks to show the capabilities and dangers of AI, and promoting a culture of AI development within the national security apparatus that utilizes the potential of the technology while securing the rights and flexibilities that are foundational to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite imagery by developing many of the crucial technologies itself, winning the AI race will need that neighborhood to reimagine how it partners with private industry. The economic sector, which is the main means through which the federal government can realize AI progress at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research, information centers, and calculating power. Given those business' improvements, intelligence firms ought to prioritize leveraging commercially available AI designs and improving them with classified information. This technique enables the intelligence community to rapidly expand its abilities without having to go back to square one, enabling it to remain competitive with enemies. A current cooperation between NASA and IBM to create the world's biggest geospatial foundation model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI neighborhood as an open-source project-is an excellent demonstration of how this type of public-private collaboration can operate in practice.

As the nationwide security neighborhood integrates AI into its work, it should ensure the security and resilience of its models. Establishing requirements to deploy generative AI firmly is essential for maintaining the stability of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its cooperation with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States deals with growing rivalry to shape the future of the worldwide order, it is immediate that its intelligence companies and military profit from the nation's innovation and management in AI, focusing especially on large language designs, to supply faster and more relevant details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight needed to browse a more complex, competitive, and content-rich world.

Add comment

INDEXING JOURNAL: