DESAIN DIDAKTIS MELALUI METODE PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN DISPOSISI REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA
Abstract
This research aimed to produce of didactic design of exponent and radical through inquiry method to develop disposition of mathematical representative of grade IX student of junior high school. This research refered to the procedure of Borg and Gall which started from a preliminary study in the form of a needs analysis, didactic design organizing, didactic design validation followed by revision, field trials followed by revision, and field test. The field test showed that didactical design which had been produced could be classified as usable by design expert judgement and evaluation by material expert with average 3,2 of maximal 4. The result of field trial indicated that disposition of mathematical representative indicators which appeared dominantly after using didactic design were curiosity and thinking broadly.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan desain didaktis bilangan berpangkat dan bentuk akar melalui metode inkuiri dalam mengembangkan disposisi representasi matematis untuk siswa kelas IX SMP. Penelitian ini mengacu pada prosedur menurut Borg and Gall yaitu diawali dari studi pendahuluan berupa analisis kebutuhan, penyusunan desain didaktis, validasi desain didaktis dilanjutkan revisi, uji coba terbatas dilanjutkan revisi, dan uji lapangan dilanjutkan revisi. Hasil lapangan menunjukkan bahwa desain didaktis yang dihasilkan layak digunakan dilihat dari penilaian ahli desain dan penilaian ahli materi dengan rata-rata 3,2 dari skor maksimal 4. Hasil uji coba lapangan menunjukkan bahwa indikator disposisi representasi matematis yang dominan muncul setelah menggunakan desain didaktis adalah rasa ingin tahu dan berpikiran terbuka.
Kata kunci: desain didaktis, disposisi representasi matematis, representasi matematis
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Borg, W. R., Gall, M. D., & Gall, J. P. 2003. Educational Research. Boston: Pearson Education. Inc. [Online]. http://jurnal.utm.ac.id/index.php/MID/ article/viewFile/13/11. (14 Juni 2015).
Brousseau, Guy. Didactical Situation for Learning How to Graph Functions. [Online]. http://www.atc-minc.com/mPublications/EP/ EPATCM99/.../paper.pdf. (22 Desember 2015).
Gulo, W. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Hudiono, B. 2007. Representasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Pontianak: STAIN Pontianak Press.
Luitel, B. C. 2001. Multiple Representations of Mathematical Learning. [Online]. http://www.matedu.cinvestav.mx/adalira.pdf. (28 Desember 2015).
NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. [Online]. http://www.wested.org/lfa/NCTM2000.pdf. (21 Desember 2015).
Neria, D. & Amit, M. 2004. Students Preference of Non-Algebric Representation in Mathematical Communication. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathemathic Education. [Online]. http://www.kurims kyoto_u.ac.jp/EMIS/proceedings/PME28/RR/RR222_Neria.pdf. (28 Desember 2015).
Opara, Jacinta A. 2011. European School Science Project of the International Association for Teaching and Learning, Spain Federal College of Education (Technical). OmokuNigeria Current Research Journal of Social Sciences 3(3): 188-198, 2011 ISSN: 2041-3246 Maxwell Scientific Organization. [Online]. http://maxwellsci.com/print/crjss/v3-188-198.pdf. (22 Desember 2015).
Richhart, Ron. 2002. Intellectual Character, What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Get It. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Company. [Online]. http://as.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCD-0787972789.html. (23 Desember 2015).
Ruthven, K. Laborde, C. Leach, J. & Thibergien, A. 2009. Design Tools in Didactical Research: Instrumenting the Epistemological and Cognitive Aspects of the Design of Teaching Sequences. Educational Researcher 38, 329. [Online]. http://www.educ.com.ac.uk/people/staff/ruthven/journal.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3102/0013189x09338513. (19 Desember 2015).
Sanjaya, Wina. 2010. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarno, U. 2010. Berpikir dan Disposisi Matematika: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana Dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI. [Online]. http://math.sps.upi.edu. (22 Desember 2015).
Suryadi, D. 2010a. Menciptakan Proses Belajar Aktif. Kajian dari Sudut Pandang Teori Belajar dan Teori Didaktik. Handout Seminar. Bandung
Suryadi, D. 2010b. Kesetaraan Didactical Design Research (DDR) dengan Matematika Realistik dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika. Makalah Utama Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNS 2011. Surakarta.
Sund, R. B. & Trowbridge, L. W. 1973. Teaching Science by Inquiry in Secondary School. Second Edition Columbus: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company.
Tishman, Shari & Andrade, Albert. 2014. Thinking Dispositions: A Review of Current Theories, Practices, and Issues. [Online]. http://www.thinkingschoolsinternational.com/.../Thinking-Dispositions-tishman-and-andrade.doc. (3 September 2015).
Yunarti, Tina. 2014. Desain Didaktis Teori Peluang SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, Vol. 15, No. 1, April 2014. [Online]. http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/5479. (12 September 2015).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexing by:
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.