PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA

Arif Nurcahya, Agus Suyatna, Herpratiwi Herpratiwi

Abstract


The aim of this research was to discuss the difference of cognitive learning outcome and critical thinking ability with guided and free inquiry learning using TALULAR. Quasi Experiment method was used in four experiments classes by analysis of paired simple t-test. From average the of N-gain for each class, the result got cognitive learning outcome categorized as medium level, between 0.402 to 0.519. For improvement of critical thinking ability, is categorized as medium level by indicators of giving simple explanation (MPS), giving further explanation (MPLL), applying strategy and technique (MST). From this research, there is a difference in improvement of cognitive learning outcomes when student learnt by guided inquiry and free inquiry without TALULAR, and with TALULAR. Otherwise, there is no difference between the improvement of critical thinking ability in guided inquiry and free inquiry using TALULAR and without TALULAR.

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa yang menggunakan inkuiri bebas, inkuiri terbimbing serta dengan TALULAR. Metode Quasi Experiment digunakan untuk empat kelas eksperimen dengan analisis uji paired simple t-test. Dari rata-rata N-gain didapatkan bahwa hasil belajar kognitif seluruh kelas tergolong kategori sedang antara 0,402 sampai 0,519. Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa tergolong kategori sedang antara 0,479 hingga 0,622 dengan indikator MPS, MPLL, serta MST. Dari penelitian ini, ada perbedaan peningkatan hasil belajar kognitif siswa pada inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri bebas ketika siswa belajar tanpa menggunakan TALULAR dan menggunakan TALULAR. Namun belum tampak memberikan perbedaan pada peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa.

Kata kunci: berpikir kritis, hasil belajar kognitif, inkuiri, TALULAR.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmad, Arief. 2007. Memahami Berpikir Kritis. Artikel Pendidikan. Network. Diakses 5 April 2014 dari http://researchengines.com/1007arief3.html

Chew, Charles. 2011. Professional Development of Inservice Science Teachers in Singapore : The Inquiry-Based Approach. Paper. 2nd International Conference on Science Education and Teachers Professional Development. Bali.

Dimyati. Mudjiono. 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Gwayi, S Mackson. 2009. Perceptions of Innovation s as Predictors of TALULAR Implementation Levels among Secondary School Science Teachers in Malawi : A Diffusion of Innovation Perspective. Dissertation. Virginia Politechnic Institute and State University. Blacksburg. Virginia US. Open digital library diakses melalui https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/26698/Gwayi_Dissertation_ETD_April24.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y pada 18 Januari 2013

Hamalik, Oemar. 2001. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Joyce, Bruce dan, Marsha. 2003. Models of Teaching : 5th edition. Prentice-Hall. USA

Kadzera. 2006. Use of Instructional Technologies in Teacher Training Colledge in Malawi. Dessertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. open digital library diakses dari https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/27728/Dissertation-Kadzera.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y pada 27 Juli 2014

Kessler, James H. 2007. Inquiry in Action : Inverstigating Matter through Inquiry 3rd . American Chemical Society. Amerika.

Mendrofa, Firman. 2009. Implementasi Model Belajar Konstruktivis dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Mengubah Miskonsepsi ditinjau dari Penalaran Formal Siswa SMA Sugar Group. Tesis. Magister Teknologi Pendidikan. Universitas Lampung. Lampung

Mulyasa. 2007. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Rosda. Bandung.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.

Santrock, John. 2008. Perkembangan Anak (Jilid 1) Edisi 11 (terjemahan). Erlangga. Jakarta.

Susanti. 2010. Studi Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Suchman Inquiry Model dengan General Inquiry Model. Tesis. Universitas Lampung.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.