PENINGKATAN KETERAMPILAN MENULIS PARAGRAF DESKRIPSI BAHASA INGGRIS MELALUI PEMANFAATAN MEDIA KARIKATUR

Apri Mahendra Putra, Bambang Setiyadi, Ni Nyoman Wety S

Abstract


This research was aimed to analyse, (1) lesson plan, (2) learning process activity in English lesson through caricature picture, (3) learning evaluation system in English lesson through caricature picture, and (4) increasing learning result in English lesson through caricature picture. This research used classroom action research in three cycles. The first cycle was using black and white caricature pictures. The second cycle was using colourful pictures and the third cycle was using animation pictures. The subject of the research was the students of ninth classes of MTs Annur Pelopor Bandar Jaya Central Lampung in academic year of 2010/2011. Data was collected through, observation, written test, and documentations further analyzed by qualitative descriptive. The findings of the study were (1) lesson plan was arranged by syntaxes teacher prepared several pictures, students tried to find vocabularies dealing with the pictures given, students arranged vocabularies became sentences, students did revisions, teacher and students made conclusion, (2) learning process using caricature picture was able to increase students learning activity within aspect of asking and writing description paragraph in a proper manner. At first, students tended to obey the learning prcess, however at the next cycle students were able to write description paragraph individually. At the third cycle, students considered active reaching 30 students (93,80%) in IXa class and 29 students (94%) in IXb class, (3) The evaluation system consist of aspects in writing descriptive paragraph such as the gist of descriptive text, language structure and structure of ideas, and (4) students’ learning result was also increased significantly. In the 1st cycle the students’ average mark was 63 and 20 students (32%) passed the test, in the 2nd cycle there were 28 students (44%) passed the test, and in the 3rd cycle the students’ average mark was 84 with 53 students (84%) passed the test.
Key words: descriptive writing paragraph, caricature picture.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwi, Hasan. 2003. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta. PT Balai Pustaka.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Budiningsih, C. Asri. 2005. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2006. Petunjuk Teknis Pengembangan Silabus Mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta.

Budiono, dkk. 2008. Strategi memanfaatkan media Gambar untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan kosakata pada pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris pada Sekolah Dasar. http://tpcommunity05,blogspot.com.September 2008.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Teaching of Language and Teaching. New York. Longman.

Depdiknas. 2001. Pedoman Teknis Pelaksanaan Classroom Action Research (CAR). Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menemgah. Jakarta.

Depdiknas.2001.Petunjuk Teknis Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Direktorat Pembinaan SMP Dirjen Manajemen, Depdiknas. Jakarta.

Depdiknas. 2001.Kebijakan di Bidang Pendidikan Dasar. Dirjen dikdasmen. Jakarta.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2009. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Hamalik,O.2008. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Lahade. John R, dkk. 2007. Materi Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Mahasiswa Pra Dasar UKSW. UKSW.

Marpadi, D. 2003. Pola Induk Sistem Pengujian Hasil KBM Berbasis KemampuanDasar.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta.

Miarso, Yusufhadi. 2005. Menyemai Benih Teknologi Pendidikan. Prenada Media. Jakarta.

Moleong, Lexy,J. 2005. Metodologi Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Bandung.

Mulyasa. 2003. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Rosdakarya. Bandung

Munandar, Utami. 2004. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta.

PT. Rineka Cipta.

Nunan, D. 2003. The Impact of English as a Global Language on Educational Policies and Practices in the Asia-Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 4, Winter.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2001. Penelitian dan Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia dan sastra. BPFE. Yogyakarta.

Nursisto. 2000. Penuntun Mengarang. Adi Cita Karya Nusa. Yogyakarta.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan (SNP). Depdiknas. Jakarta.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi (SI). Depdiknas. Jakarta.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Kelulusan (SKL). Depdiknas. Jakarta.

Rani, Abdul. 2006. Analisis Wacana: Sebuah Kajian Bahasa dalam Pemakaian.

Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Reigeluth,C.M. dan Stein, F.S. 1983. Instructtional-Design Theories and Models.

London:Routledge.

Sardiman, Arief. 2006. Media Pengajaran (Pengertian, Pengembangan, dan

Pemanfaatannya). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grasindo Persada.

Semi, Atar. 2007. Dasar-dasar Keterampilan Menulis. Bandung: Angkasa.

Simberg, A.L. 1964. Creativity at Work. Boston, MA. Industrial Education Institute ( 41-69)

Sirait, Bistok, dkk. 1985. Pedoman Karang Mengarang. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Depdikbud. Jakarta.

Slameto, 2001. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta Jakarta.

Sudiati, Dra. Vero, dkk. 2005. Kiat Menulis Deskripsi dan Narasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.

Sudjana, Nana dan Ahmad Rifa’i. 2001. Teknologi Pengajaran. Bandung. Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Sukidin, Basrowi, dan Suranto. 2008. Manajemen Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Insan Cendekia. Jakarta.

Suparno. 2006. Keterampilan Dasar Menulis. Universitas Terbuka. Jakarta.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2008. Menulis sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa.

Bandung: Angkasa.

Tompkins, Gail E. 1990. Teaching Writing Balancing Process and Product. Macmillan Publishing Company. New York:

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 2004. Kartun: Studi Tentang Permainan Bahasa. Ombak. Jogjakarta.

Wiriaatmadja, Rochiati. 2008. Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.

Wiyanto. 2004. Terampil Menulis Paragraf. Grasindo. Jakarta


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.