PERBEDAAN PENINGKATAN PRESTASI BELAJAR RECOUNT TEXT MENGGUNAKAN PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN MOTIVASI

Wiwik Muliati, Herpratiwi Herpratiwi, Muhammad Sukirlan

Abstract


This research aimed at finding: 1) the interaction between the cooperative learning, level of learning motivation on the improvement of students achievement in learning English; 2) the difference between the improvement of students achievement through STAD and Jigsaw. 3) the difference between the improvement of students achievement through STAD and Jigsaw on the high motivation; 4) the difference between the improvement of students achievement through STAD and Jigsaw on the low motivation. The result showed that: 1) there is an interaction between the cooperative learning and students learning motivation towards the improvement of students achievement; 2) the avarage of the students achievement through JIGSAW is higher than STAD; 3) the avarage of the students achievement through JIGSAW on the high learning motivation is higher than STAD; 4) the avarage of the students achievement through STAD on the low learning motivation is higher than Jigsaw.

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui: 1) ada tidaknya interaksi antara pembelajaran, tingkat motivasi belajar pada peningkatan prestasi belajar siswa : 2) perbedaan peningkatan prestasi belajar siswa yang menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan Jigsaw : 3) perbedaan prestasi belajar siswa yang menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan Jigsaw pada motivasi belajar tinggi; dan 4) perbedaan prestasi belajar siswa yang menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan Jigsaw pada motivasi belajar rendah.Hasil penelitian menunjukan: 1) terdapat interaksi penggunaan pembelajaran kooperatif dan motivasi belajar terhadap prestasi belajar: 2) rerata peningkatan prestasi belajar pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih tinggi dari tipe STAD : 3) rerata peningkatan prestasi belajar pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih tinggi daripada tipe STAD pada motivasi belajar tinggi : 4) rerata peningkatan prestasi belajar pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi daripada tipe JIGSAW pada motivasi belajar rendah.

Kata kunci: hasil belajar, motivasi, recount text


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arend, R. And Ann Kilcher. 2010. Teaching for Student Learning: Becoming an Accomplished Teacher. New York: Routledge

Arend, R. 2012. Learning to Teach, 9th Ed, USA: McGraw Hill

Jolliffe W. 2007. Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. California: Paul Chapman Publishing

Kerlinger Fred N. 1990. Asas-asas penelitian behavioral. Terjemahan. Yogyakarta: Gadjahmada University Press.

Nickelsen, John. 2011. Mentoring the Educational Leader: A Practical Framework for Success. USA: Rowman and Littlefield

Persky, A. M. and Pollack, G. M. 2009. A Hybrid Jigsaw Approach to Teaching Renal Clearance Concepts. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 73(3).

Santrock, J. 2011. Educational Psychology: New York: McGraw Hill

Slavin, Robert E. 2005. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. London: Allymand Bacon.

Slavin, Robert E. 1991. Student Team Learning: A Practical Guide to Cooperative Learning. Third Edition. Washington D.C: National Education Association

Weidman, R., Bishop, M. J. 2009. Using the Jigsaw Model to Facilitate Cooperative Learning in an Online Course, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1):51-64

Woolfolk , Anita E. 2006. Psychology of Education 9th Ed. San Fransisco: Prentice Hall


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.