Peningkatan Pemahaman Guru dalam Menyusun Asesmen Diagnostik Platform Merdeka Mengajar untuk Mengakomodasi Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi

Nurhanurawati Nurhanurawati, Viyanti Viyanti, Widyastuti Widyastuti, Dimas Permadi

Abstract


Evaluasi proses pembelajaran mengungkap fakta bahwa: 52,35% pendefinisian tujuan pembelajaran matematika dan fisika berdasarkan kurikulum masih minim, 47,59% dokumen penilaian belum berkelanjutan, hanya 66,67% guru merespon kebutuhan ideal belajar siswa, serta 45,67% proses penilaian pembelajaran masih dilakukan secara terpisah-pisah. Terungkap juga adanya kebutuhan dalam peningkatan kompetensi guru terkait asesmen diagnostik untuk mengakomodasi pembelajaran berdiferensiasi. Untuk menjawab kebutuhan tersebut, diperlukan suatu kegiatan workshop yang bertujuan untuk melatih guru menyusun asesmen diagnostik kombinasi instrument platform merdeka mengajar bermutu. Target khusunya adalah memberikan pemahaman, pengalaman dan kesempatan melakukan desiminasi kepada guru tentang prinsip penyusunan, penggunaan, serta pengolahan hasil asesmen diagnostik kombinasi instrumen platform merdeka mengajar. Metode yang digunakan berbentuk workshop partisifatif dengan pemberian materi, pelatihan dan praktik menyusun butir soal. Pada hari kedua dan ketiga peserta melanjutkan menyusun butir soal diagnostik kombinasi instrumen platform merdeka mengajar. Workshop dilaksanakan di Gedung K FKIP Universitas Lampung dengan diikuti 33 peserta dari berbagai sekolah. Berdasarkan hasil kegiatan yang telah dilaksanakan, diperoleh simpulan bahwa pengetahuan dan pemahaman guru SMP/MTs bidang matematika dan IPA mengalami peningkatan dan keterampilan guru SMP/MTs bidang matematika dan IPA meningkat terutama dalam penyusunan asesmen diagnostik. Sehingga dimungkinkan peserta dapat menyusun sendiri di sekolah masing-masing. Menindaklanjuti kegiatan ini, hendaknya perlu dilakukan kegiatan dengan jangkauan yang lebih luas dan adanya kesinambungan dan monitoring pasca kegiatan pengabdian ini. Sehingga guru-guru SMP/MTs dapat mempraktekan penggunaan asesmen diagnostik dalam pembelajaran kurikulum merdeka.

 

Kata Kunci: asesmen diagnostic; merdeka belajar; pembelajaran berdiferensiasi

 

Abstract

Evaluation of the learning process revealed the fact that: 52.35% of the definition of mathematics and physics learning objectives based on the curriculum is still minimal, 47.59% of assessment documents are not yet sustainable, only 66.67% of teachers respond to students' ideal learning needs, and 45.67% of the assessment process learning is still carried out separately. It was also revealed that there was a need to increase teacher competence regarding diagnostic assessments to accommodate differentiated learning. To answer this need, a workshop activity is needed which aims to train teachers to prepare diagnostic assessments using a combination of quality independent teaching platform instruments. The specific target is to provide understanding, experience and opportunities to disseminate to teachers about the principles of compiling, using and processing the results of diagnostic assessments using the independent teaching platform instrument combination. The method used is in the form of a participatory workshop with the provision of materials, training and practice in preparing question items. On the second and third days, participants continued to compose diagnostic questions on the combination of independent teaching platform instruments. The workshop was held in Building K, FKIP, University of Lampung, attended by 33 participants from various schools. Based on the results of the activities that have been carried out, it can be concluded that the knowledge and understanding of SMP/MTs teachers in mathematics and science has increased and the skills of SMP/MTs teachers in mathematics and science have increased, especially in preparing diagnostic assessments. So it is possible for participants to arrange their own at their respective schools. Following up on this activity, it is necessary to carry out activities with a wider reach and provide continuity and monitoring after this service activity. So that SMP/MTs teachers can practice the use of diagnostic assessments in independent curriculum learning.

Keywords: diagnostic assessment; freedom to learn; differentiated learning



DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/rp/v3i2.hal.92-99



Keywords


Asesmen Diagnostik; Merdeka Belajar; Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi

References


Anggraena, Yogi; Ginanto, DIan; Felici, Nisa; Andriati; Herutami, I. (2022). Pembelajaran dan Penilain. Panduan Pembelajaran Dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, Dan Menengah.

Budyartati, S. (2016). Tes Kognitif Diagnostik Untuk Mendeteksi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 1(01), 40–50.

Baumgartner Bosker, R. J. (2005). The Limits of Differentiated Education. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Coubergs, Struyven, Vanthournout, et al., 2017, Dijkstra, Walraven, Mooij, et al., 2016; Dweck, 2010).

Chandra Handa (2019) Leading Differentiated Learning for the Gifted. International Perceptions of Giftedness and Gifted Education.

Firmanzah, D., & Sudibyo, E. (2021). Implementasi Asesmen Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran IPA pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di SMP/MTs Wilayah Menganti, Gresik. Pensa: E-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(2), 165-170. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/37361

Hodges & McTigue (2014). Renovating Literacy Centers for Middle Grades: Differentiating, Reteaching, and Motivating. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, v87 n4 p155-160 2014

Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2014). De staat van het onderwijs: Onderwijsverslag 2012/2013 [The state of education in The Netherlands: The 2012/2013 education report]. Utrecht: Author.

Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2015a). Beginnende leraren kijken terug – Onderzoek onder afgestudeerden. Deel 1: De pabo [Starting teachers looking back – A study among graduates: Part 1: Teacher training]. Utrecht: Author.

Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2015b). De staat van het onderwijs: Onderwijsverslag 2013/2014 [The state of education in The Netherlands: The 2013/2014 education report]. Utrecht: Author. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/rapporten/ 2015/04/15/de-staat-van-het-onderwijs-onderwijsverslag-2013-2014/de-staat- van-het-onder wijs-onderwijsverslag-2013-2014.pdf

Lou, Abrami, dan Spence, 2000. Effects of Within-Class Grouping on Student Achievement: An Exploratory Model. The Journal of Educational Research Volume 94, 2000 - Issue 2.

Marisa (2021). Curriculum Innovation “Independent Learning” In The Era of Society 5.0 . Santhet: Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan dan Humaniora. Vol. 4, No.1 pp. 1-9.

Marlina et.al (2020). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Sebagai Upaya Pemenuhan Aksesibilitas Psikologis Siswa Berkebutuhan Khusus di Sekolah Inklusif. Disampaikan pada Upacara Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Tetap Jurusan Pendidikan Luar Biasa Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dalam Bidang Ilmu Psikologi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus http://repository.unp.ac.id/35800/1/2021_Nov_Pidato_Pengukuhan_Guru_Besar _Marlina_ok_ok.pdf

Morgan (2014). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mulyasa. (2007). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: PT. Remaja. Rosdakarya Nasution (2022)

OECD. (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. OECD Publishing Paris.

Parsons et al. (2018). Teachers’ Instructional Adaptations: A Research Synthesis. Sage Journal. Volume 88, Issue 2

Pozas dan Schneider (2019), Teachers and differentiated instruction: exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs Volume 20, Issue 3 p. 217-230.

Reis, McCoach, Little, dkk. (2011), The Effects of Differentiated Instruction and Enrichment Pedagogy on Reading Achievement in Five Elementary Schools, American Educational Research Journal.

Roy, Guay, and Valois (2013) Teaching to address diverse learning needs: development and validation of a Differentiated Instruction Scale, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17:11, 1186-1204.

Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning and cooperative school. Educational Leadership, 45, 7-13.

Suryaman (2020). Orientasi Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. /Prosiding Seminar Daring Nasional: Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 21 Oktober 2020

Tanang, H. dan Abu, B. 2014. Teacher Profesionalism and Professional Development Practices in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3(2), 25‒42.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Valiandes, S. (2015). Evaluating the Impact of Differentiated Instruction on Literacy and Reading in Mixed Ability Classrooms: Quality and Equity Dimensions of Education Effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17-26.

Wiguna, I. K. W., & Tristaningrat, M. A. N. (2022). Langkah Mempercepat Perkembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(1), 17.

Yusuf, A. R., & Mukhadis, A. (2018). Model Pengembangan Profesionalitas Guru Sesuai Tuntutan Revitalisasi Pendidikan Vokasi di Indonesia. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v9i2.1613


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing by: 

           

 

 

Creative Commons License

Ruang Pengabdian: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International LicenseCopyright © Mathematics and Science Education Department, Universitas LampungAll rights reservedp-ISSN 2807-2251e-ISSN 2798-9453