Learning Motivation and SMART Risk-Taking Behavior of Students for Prospective Teacher of Chemistry in Online Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic

Sunyono Sunyono, Annisa Meristin

Abstract


Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui motivasi belajar kimia dan smart risk taking behavior dalam menghadapi pembelajaran online di masa pandemi covid-19. Desain penelitian deskriptif kualitatif digunakan untuk memperoleh data penelitian untuk memperoleh kesimpulan. Subyek penelitian meliputi mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Lampung semester 1 (angkatan 2021), semester 3 (angkatan 2020), dan semester 5 (angkatan 2019) yang berjumlah 158 orang. Pengumpulan data penelitian menggunakan angket motivasi dan skala IRT-S yang disebarkan melalui google form dan observasi dalam mode vclass.unila.ac.id untuk mendapatkan data proses pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ((1) mahasiswa masih belum memiliki motivasi yang tinggi untuk mengikuti perkuliahan online.(2) Selama pembelajaran online mahasiswa kurang berani mengambil resiko secara cerdas (SRTB rendah) dalam pembelajaran, hanya preferensi yang relatif tinggi pada kimia ( lebih dari 50%) siswa menyatakan berani melakukan hal-hal baru, sedangkan yang lain seperti percaya diri dalam mengambil resiko secara cerdas dalam belajar relatif rendah.(3) Siswa yang memiliki motivasi tinggi dan lebih tertarik pada sains, maka siswa tersebut akan juga memiliki keberanian mengambil resiko secara cerdas ketika belajar.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa rendahnya motivasi belajar online siswa menyebabkan siswa kurang berani mengambil resiko untuk belajar secara cerdas. Oleh karena itu dalam pembelajaran online, harus ada lebih banyak nuansa pembelajaran kimia yang dapat mendukung perilaku cerdas mengambil risiko bagi siswa.

Kata kunci: motivasi, perilaku mengambil risiko, calon guru kimia, pandemi covid-19

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jppk.v11.i1.2022.04


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akdağ, E.M., Köksal, M.S., & Ertekin, P. (2017). Üstün yetenekli ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen öğrenmede zihinsel risk alma davranışlarının sınıf düzeyi ve cinsiyet değişkenleri açısından incelenmesi. [Investigating gifted middle school students’ intellectual risk taking behaviors in learning science across gender and grade]. Adnan Menderes University Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 16-25.

Allmond, S., Hillman, J., Huntly, K., Makar, K., & O’Brien, M. (2016). Assessing children’s progress in taking intellectual risks in a mathematical inquiry classroom with a positive learning approach. In B. White, M. Chinnappan, S. Trenholm (Eds.), Opening up Mathematics Education Research. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Merga. pp. 94- 101.

Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinant of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.

Bal-İncebacak, B., Yaman, S., & Sarışan-Tungaç, A. (2019). The relation between intellectual risk-taking regarding science classes and test anxiety inventory of secondary school. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), 1-9.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman

Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 210–223, 2009.

Clifford, M.M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical, and educational considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263-297.

Hernández, J. C., & Ramzy, A. (2020). China confirms new coronavirus spreads from humans to humans. New York Times. January, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/ 2020/01/20/world/asia/ coronavirus-chinasymptoms.html.

Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher’s perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 311–339). New York: Academic.

Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., ... & Cao, B. (2020). Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The lancet, 395(10223), 497-506.

Hunter, J.P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). The positive psychology of interested adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 27–35.

Jamaluddin, D., Ratnasih, T., Gunawan, H., & Paujiah, E. (2020). Pembelajaran daring masa pandemik Covid-19 pada calon guru: hambatan, solusi dan proyeksi. LP2M.

Keller, J. M. (2016). Motivation, Learning, and Technology: Applying the ARCS-V Motivation Model. Participatory Educational Research (PER). Vol. 3(2), p.1-13.

Küçükaydın, M. A. (2021). Examination of Elementary School Students’ Scientific Attitudes and Intellectual Risk Taking Behaviours. Science Education International, 32(2), 149–158.

Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., ... & Feng, Z. (2020). Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia. New England Journal of Medicine. 382. No. 13: 1199 – 1207.

Meyer, D.K., Turner, J.C., & Spencer, C.A. (1997). Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in projectbased learning. The Elementary School Journal, 97(5), 501-521.

Neihart, M. (1999). Sistematic risk‐taking. Roeper Review, 21(4), 289–292.

Permadi, D. A., Noviekayati, I. G. A. A., & Meiyuntariningsi, T. (2020). Hubungan antara Risk Taking Behavior dan Harga Diri dengan Perilaku Narsistik Remaja Penggunaan Instagram Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian. PSIKOSAINS (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pemikiran Psikologi), 14(2), 115-131.

Radloff, J., Capobianco, B., & Dooley, A. (2019). Elementary teachers’ positive and practical risk-taking when teaching science through engineering design. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 9(2), 51-63.

Renninger, K.A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 375–404). New York: Academic.

Strielkowski, W. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and the digital revolution in academia and higher education. Preprint (17 April 2020): 1–6.

Tay, B., Özkan, D., & Tay, B.A. (2009). The effect of academic risk taking levels on the problem solving ability of gifted students. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 1(1), 1099-1104.

Yoo S, Kim, H dan Young Kwon, S. (2014). Between ideal and reality: A different view on online-learning interaction in a crossnational context. Journal for Multicultural Education, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 13-30.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.