Student Worksheets Based on Science Literacy to Practice Students' Argumentation Skills on Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution Materials

Sisilia Fil Jannati, Rusmini Rusmini

Abstract


Student Worksheets Based on Science Literacy to Practice Students' Arguing Skills on Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution Subjects. The purpose of this research is to produce student worksheets in training students' argumentation skills on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution materials that are feasible from the aspect of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. This research uses the 4D research method (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate), but is limited to the Develop stage. The validity of the student worksheets in terms of content, presentation, language, and graphic aspects obtained very valid criteria with an average percentage of 87.50%: 89.50%; 88.00%; 85.50%. The practicality of the student worksheets is assessed from the student activity observation sheets during learning and student response questionnaires. Relevant student activities obtained very practical criteria with 92.86% at the first meeting and 90.48% at the second meeting. Student response questionnaires got very practical standards with an average percentage in content, presentation, language, and graphics, respectively 97.33%; 96.80%; 93.33%; and 95.83%. The effectiveness of student worksheets to obtain very effective results can be seen from the increase in learning outcomes on cognitive tests and students' argumentation skills tests with n-gain values of 0.79 and 0.85, which have high interpretations. This result is also supported by the results of the Paired Sample T-Test and obtained a Sig value. (2-Tailed) of 0.000 on cognitive tests and tests of argumentation skills. It means there is an influence in the use of student worksheets developed on the results of cognitive tests and students' argumentation skills. Student worksheets based on scientific literacy are very important to train students' argumentation skills.

 

Keywords: student worksheet, scientific literacy, argumentation skills, electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jppk.v11.i1.2022.02


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afandi, A. A., Rusmini. (2021). Kelayakan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Peserta Didik Kelas XI. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 10(2), 172-184.

Aisyah, Dwiningsih, K. (2017). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) Berorientasi Literasi Sains pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektroliy. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 6(2), 329-333.

Anisa, D., & Mitarlis. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berwawasan Green Chemistry untuk Meningkatkan Ketmampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 9(3), 407-416.

Ariningtyas, A., Wardani, S., & Maharmanti, W. (2017). Efektivitas Lembar Kerja Siste Bermuatan Etnosains Materi Hidrolisis Garam untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(3), 407-416.

BSNP. (2012). Standar Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: BSNP.

Chang, Raymond. (2005). Kimia Dasar: Konsep-Konsep Inti Edisi Ketiga Jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Darmodjo, H., & Kaligis, R. E. (1993). Pendidikan IPA 2. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Deane, P., & Song Y. (2014). A case study in principled assessment design: Designing Assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. Psicologia Educativa, 20(2), 99-108.

Devi, N. D. C., Susanti, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ablility in the topic of Buffer Solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 141

Dewi, J. S., Setyarini, M., & Efkar, T. (2018). Pengembagan LKS Berorientasi High Order Thinking Skills pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia (JPPK), 7(2).

Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. USA: Springer.

Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim. 2015. Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry dalam Pemebelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 32-37.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Hake, R. R. 1998. Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physic Courses. American Journal of Physics, 20(1), 21-33.

Hong, L. Y., & Talib, C.A. (2018). Scientific Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Implications and Suggestions. Asian Social Science, 14(11), 16-29.

Ibrahim. (2001). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Irvan. A., Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Berbasis Pola Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) Menggunakan Modle Argument Driven Inquiry dan Diskusi pada Pembelajaran Fisika SMA. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 318-324.

Irwansyah, F. S., Lubab, I., Farida, I., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2017). Designing Interactive Electronic Module in Chemistry Lesson. Journal of Physics: Conferences Series: 1-8.

Lazarou, D. (2009). Learning to TAP: An Effort to Scaffold Students Argumentation in Science. Contemporary Education Research Scientific Literacy and Social Aspects of Science ESERA Conference.

Maknun, D. (2014). Penerapan Pembelajaran Konstektual untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains dan Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pondok Pesantren Daarul Uluum PUI Majalengka pada Diskusi Sosiosaintifik IPA. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 21(1), 119-148.

Muna, A., M., & Rusmini. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik pada Materi Laju Reaksi. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 10(2), 159-171.

OECD. (2019). Result in Focus PISA 2018: Draft Science Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K., (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315-347.

Plomp, Tjreerd & Nieveen, Nienke. (2010). An introducting to Educational Design Research. Enschede, The Netherlands: Netherlanda Institute for Currculum Development.

Putriana, F. (2021). Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Literasi Sains dengan Keterampilan Argumentasi Peserta Didik SMA pada Materi Virus. Skripsi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif: Mencipatakan Metode Pembelajaran yang Menarik dan Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Rahayu, M., Kurniati, T., Yusup, I.W. (2018). Keterampilan Argumentasi pada Pembelajaran Materi Sistem Respirasi Manusia melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Talk Write. Jurnal Bio Educatio, 3(2), 50-58.

Rahmawati, F., Fatimah, V., Buraidah, N.L., Wa’fa, A. R. E., Faizah, S. N., Mukaromah, A. (2021). Efektivitas Video Belajar dalam Pembelajaran Daring Matematika Materi Transformasi pada Siswa SMP. Jurnl Theorems (The Originial Research of Matehematics), 5(2), 202-211.

Riduwan. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Statistiaka. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Santoso, S. (2014). Buku Latihan SPSS Statistik Parametrik. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Saputi, L., Effendi, H., & Yusnelti. (2018). Perbandingan Kemampuan Argumentasi Menggunakan Model Guided Discovery Learning dan Direct Instruction pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas XI IPA di SMAN 8 Kota Jambi. Artikel Ilmiah, Respository Universitas Jambi.

Schunk, D H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspectives 6th Edition. New York: Pearson Educational Inc.

Sinaga, D. D., Nyeneng, I. D. P., & Herlina, K. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Predict-Observe-Explain Pada Materi Tekanan Dalam Zat Cait untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sains Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2).

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Toulmin, D. H. (2003). The Uses of Argument. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Ulandari, & Mitarlis. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berwawasan Green Chemistry untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains pada Materi Asam Basa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2764-2777.

Wagner, T. (2010). The Global Achievement Gap. Cambridge: Harvard University.

Widjajanti, E. (2008). Kualitas Lembar Kerja Peserta Siswa. Makalah yang disampaikan dalam Kegiatan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat dengan judul “Pelatihan LKS Mata Pelajaran Kimia” di Ruang Sidang Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.