Efektivitas Model POGIL untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia

Nova Patria Ningsih, Nina Kadaritna, Lisa Tania

Abstract


This study aims to describe the effectiveness of POGIL model to improve Creative Thinking Skill in topic of Chemical Equilibrium. Population in the research was students of XI Science from one of SMAN in Bandar Lampung Academic Year 2018/2019. Samples were chosen by purposive sampling and from which grade XI was chosen Science 3 as the experimental class and XI Science 2 as the  control class. POGIL model was used in the experimental class and control class used conventional lecture. The results showed the average scores n-Gain of students creative thinking skill in the experimental class were greater than the control class. Based on the result of t test and supported by student activities and then the implementation of POGIL model learning by teacher, it could be concluded that the POGIL model was effective to improve creative thinking skill students on chemical equilibrium topic.

Keywords: chemical equilibrium, creative thinking skill, and effectiveness of POGIL model.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan efektivitas model POGIL untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif pada materi kesetimbangan kimia. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI MIPA disalah satu SMA di Bandar Lampung tahun ajaran 2018/2019, sampel dipilih dengan teknik purposive dan didapatkan kelas XI MIPA 3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan XI MIPA 2 sebagai kelas kontrol. Kelas eksperimen menggunakan pembelajaran dengan model POGIL dan kelas kontrol dengan model ceramah. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata skor n-Gain keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas eksperimen lebih besar dari kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan hasil dari uji t serta didukung dengan aktivitas siswa dan keterlaksanaan pembelajaran model POGIL oleh guru maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa model POGIL efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa pada materi kesetimbangan kimia.

Kata kunci: efektivitas model POGIL, kesetimbangan kimia, dan keterampilan berpikir kreatif.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto. 2006. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Awang, H., dan Ramly, I. 2008. Creative Thinking Skill Approach Through Problem-Based Learning: Pedagogy and Practice in the Engineering Classroom. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 16(2):90-100.

Badriyah,G.K,Kusumawati.D. 2016. Melatihkan keterampilan proses sains melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Pada Materi Penerapan Model POGIL untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Ditinjau Dari Hasil Belajar 112 Laju Reaksi”. Unesa Journal of Chemical Educatio. 5(02):7.

De Gale,S., & L.N. Boisselle.2015.The Effect of POGIL on Academic Performance anda Academic Confidence. The University of the West Indies. Science Education International. 2:56.

Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R.S., Platt, T., Nelson, P.V., & White, H.B. (2008). Article pedagogies of engagement in science: A comparison of PBL, POGIL and PLTL. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 36(4):262-273.

Fraenkel, J. R., N. E. Wallen., & Hyun,H.H. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education Eighth Edittion. New York : The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Hake, R. R. 1998. Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods;A Six Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data For Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics. 66(1):67-74.

Hanib, M. T. 2017. Application of POGIL learning to improve the ability of critical thinking. Journal of Education. Theory, Research and Development. 2(1):22-3.1.

Hanson, D.M. 2006. Instructor's Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning. Lisle : Pacific Crest.

Imran,Y., Anggraini, Laily, R., Rusly, H.2016. Efektivitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Berorientasi ModelPembelajaran Leraning Cycle 7E pada Materi Suhu dan Perubahannya. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains. 02(2):5.

Johnson. 2011 Educational Research 4th Ed.: Quantitative, qualitative, and mix-methods approaches. California : SAGE Publication.

Lee, H. H. 2012. Incorporating Active Learning and Student Inquiry into an Introductory Merchandising Class. Higher Education Studies. 2(1):55-63.

Limantara, L.M & Rahayu, I. 2013. Upgrading The Availability Of Building Sentence On Indonesian Language Learning By Using Series Pictures Media. Academic Research International. 4(2):530-539.

Ningsih,S. M., Bambang, S., & Sopyan, A. 2012. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran POGIL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Unnes Physics Education Journal. 1(2):44-52.

Ngalimun. 2013. Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran.Yogyakarta : Aswaja Pressiondo.

Rohmah, Y. N., & Muchlis. (2013). Application of learning with POGIL strategy on soluble material and solubility times to train Kemampun critical thinking of students of Class XI SMA Negeri 1 Sooko Mojokerto. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education. 2(3):19-23.

Sudjana. 2005. Metode Statistika. Bandung : Tarsito.

Sunyono. 2012. Buku Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Multiple Representasi (Model SiMaYang). Bandar Lampung : Aura Printing and Publishing.

Suprayanti. 2016. Penerapan Model Discovery Learning BerbantuanAlat Peraga Sederhana untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 5 Jonggat TahunAjaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 2(1):4-12.

Widodo. 2016. Higher Order Thinking Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Berorientasi Pembentukkan Karakter Siswa. Cakrawala Pendidikan. No. 1:161-171.

Zawadzki, R. 2010. Is Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Suitable as a Teaching Method in Thailand’s Higher Education?. Asian Journal on Education and Learning, 1(2):66-74.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.