- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Open Access Policy
- Publication Ethics Statement
- Screening for Plagiarism
- Publication Fee
Focus and Scope
Research, comprises scholarly reports that enhance knowledge regarding art in general, performing art, and art education. This may include articles that report results of quantitative or qualitative research studies.
Conceptual Idea, publishes articles conceptually relevant to advancing the practice of music and learning, present theories of music, models, or philosophical position, etc. Articles may draw upon theory/or material developed in educational practice that recognize and address a wide range of pedagogical approach that would interest members from a variety of countries and teaching setting, including activities and art materials to help internationalize art curricula.
Section Policies
Articles
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
JMEPA has the Standard Operational Programme (SOP). All articles in JMEPA should submitted in ojs system through http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id. After submitting the articles, editor is checking the article scope to make the decision whether the article is accepted or rejected. The accepted article then send to the blind reviewers for substances checking. In this process, reviewer is making the decision whether the article is accpeted or rejected from the substances through the editor. The final article is laying out by lay outer before on line published.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Publication Ethics Statement
Ethics Statement
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication decisions
The decision of which articles to be published in the Journal Music Education and Performance Art (JMEPA) or Journal of Physics Learning is entirely editorial responsibility. In this case the editorial team was guided by the policy of the editorial board of the journal and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editorial team can negotiate with reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
In evaluating each article submitted to JMEPA, the editorial team will be fair and continue to prioritize the assessment of intellectual content, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the political philosophy of the author.
Confidentiality
All articles that submit to JMEPA will be kept confidential. Therefore, editors and editorial staff may not disclose any information from these submitted articles to other parties other than relevant authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, advisors and other editorial publishers, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Without the express written consent of the author, the editor in his research is prohibited to use the unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript to the JMEPA.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer reviewers assist editors to make editorial decisions on all manuscript submitted to JMEPA. In addition, peer reviewers may also assist the authors to improve the papers through editorial communication with the author.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Peer reviewers must keep the confidentiality of each received manuscript and they are not allowed to display or discuss either part or all of the text except as permitted by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Screening for Plagiarism
The Journal has an authority to screen articles for plagiarism. We use TURNITIN to check the authenticity of the article.
Publication Fee
The Journal Music Education and Performance Art (JMEPA) does not treat costs for article writing and publication. All publication processes are carried out free of charge.